Book contents
- Primate Research and Conservation in the Anthropocene
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Primate Research and Conservation in the Anthropocene
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Changing Priorities for Primate Conservation and Research in the Anthropocene
- Part I The Human–Non-human Primate Interface
- Part II Habitat Alteration in the Anthropocene
- 6 The Effects of Selective Logging on the Habitat Use of the Annamese Silvered Langur (Trachypithecus margarita) in Northeast Cambodia
- 7 The Immediate Impact of Selective Logging on Rwenzori Angolan Colobus (Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii) at Lake Nabugabo, Uganda
- 8 Threatened Hosts, Threatened Parasites?
- 9 Lemurs in Fragmented Forests
- 10 Proboscis Monkey Conservation
- Part III Climate Change in the Anthropocene
- Index
- References
10 - Proboscis Monkey Conservation
Beyond the Science
from Part II - Habitat Alteration in the Anthropocene
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2019
Book contents
- Primate Research and Conservation in the Anthropocene
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Primate Research and Conservation in the Anthropocene
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Changing Priorities for Primate Conservation and Research in the Anthropocene
- Part I The Human–Non-human Primate Interface
- Part II Habitat Alteration in the Anthropocene
- 6 The Effects of Selective Logging on the Habitat Use of the Annamese Silvered Langur (Trachypithecus margarita) in Northeast Cambodia
- 7 The Immediate Impact of Selective Logging on Rwenzori Angolan Colobus (Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii) at Lake Nabugabo, Uganda
- 8 Threatened Hosts, Threatened Parasites?
- 9 Lemurs in Fragmented Forests
- 10 Proboscis Monkey Conservation
- Part III Climate Change in the Anthropocene
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Primate Research and Conservation in the Anthropocene , pp. 182 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Agoramoorthy, G., Alagappasamy, C. & Hsu, M. J. (2004). Can proboscis monkeys be successfully maintained in captivity? A case of swings and roundabouts. Zoo Biology, 23(6), 533–44.Google Scholar
Atmoko, T. (2002). Conservation of proboscis monkey and their isolated habitat in Kuala Samboja. In East Kalimantan International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers (INAFOR). Bogor: Forestry Research and Development Agency Indonesia, pp. 446–53.Google Scholar
Bennett, E. L. (1991). Diurnal primates. In Kiew, R. (ed.) The State of Nature Conservation in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society, pp. 170–2.Google Scholar
Bennett, E. L. & Gombek, F. (1993). Proboscis Monkeys of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications.Google Scholar
Bennett, E. L. & Sebastian, A. C. (1988). Social organization and ecology of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in mixed coastal forest in Sarawak. International Journal of Primatology, 9(3), 233–55.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. & Zulhazman, H. (2006). Population size and distribution of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) in the Klias Peninsula, Sabah, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal, 59(2), 1531–63.Google Scholar
Bernard, H., Matsuda, I., Hanya, G., et al. (2018). Feeding ecology of the proboscis monkey in Sabah, Malaysia, with special reference to plant species-poor forests. In Barnett, A. A., Matsuda, I. & Nowak, K. (eds) Primates in Flooded Habitats: Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bismark, M. (1981). Preliminary survey of the proboscis monkey at Tanjung Putting Reserve, Kalimantan. Tigerpaper, 8, 26.Google Scholar
Bismark, M. (2010). Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus): bio-ecology and conservation. In Gursky, S. & Supriatna, J. (eds) Indonesian Primates. New York: Springer, pp. 217–33.Google Scholar
Boonratana, R. (2000). Ranging behavior of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in the lower Kinabatangan, Northern Borneo. International Journal of Primatology, 21(3), 497–518.Google Scholar
Buttler, R. (2013). Palm oil now biggest cause of deforestation in Indonesia. Mongabay, 3 September.Google Scholar
Cowlishaw, G. (1999). Predicting the pattern of decline of African primate diversity: an extinction debt from historical deforestation. Conservation Biology, 13(5), 1183–93.Google Scholar
Feilen, K. L. & Marshall, A. J. (2014). Sleeping site selection by proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 76(12), 1127–39.Google Scholar
Gokkon, B. (2017). ‘Ecological disaster’: controversial bridge puts East Kalimantan’s green commitment to the test. Mongabay, 30 August.Google Scholar
Hale, V. L., Tan, C. L., Niu, K., et al. (2018). Diet versus phylogeny: a comparison of gut microbiota in captive colobine monkey species. Microbial Ecology, 75(2), 515–27.Google Scholar
Inoue, E., Ogata, M., Seino, S. & Matsuda, I. (2016). Sex identification and efficient microsatellite genotyping using fecal DNA in proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus). Mammal Study, 41(3), 141–8.Google Scholar
IUCN. (2008). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Species Survival Commission (SSC).Google Scholar
Jeffrey, S. M. (1979). The proboscis monkey: some preliminary observations. Tigerpaper, 6, 5–6.Google Scholar
Kawabe, M. & Mano, T. (1972). Ecology and behavior of the wild proboscis monkey, Nasalis larvatus (Wurmb), in Sabah, Malaysia. Primates, 13(2), 213–27.Google Scholar
Koda, H., Tuuga, A., Goossens, B., et al. (2018). Nasalization by Nasalis larvatus: larger noses audiovisually advertise conspecifics in proboscis monkeys. Science Advances, 4(2). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0250.Google Scholar
Kren, J. A. (1964). Observations on the habits of the proboscis monkey, Nasalis larvatus (Wurmb.), made in the Brunei Bay area, Borneo. Zoologica, 49, 183–92.Google Scholar
Leasor, H. C. & Macgregor, O. J. (2014). Proboscis monkey tourism: can we make it ‘ecotourism’? In Russon, A. E. & Wallis, J. (eds) Primate Tourism: A Tool for Conservation? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–75.Google Scholar
Leowinata, D. (2016). Borneo conservationists and top oil palm firm work to help orangutans. Mongabay, 9 August.Google Scholar
Lhota, S., Scott, K. S. S. & Sha, J. C. M. (2018). Primates in flooded forests of Borneo: opportunities and challenges for ecotourism as a conservation strategy. In Barnett, A. A., Matsuda, I. & Nowak, K. (eds) Primates in Flooded Habitats: Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. W. (1982). Notes on the size and composition of groups of proboscis monkey, Nasalis larvatus. Folia Primatologica, 37(1–2), 95–98.Google Scholar
Manansang, J., Traylor-Holzer, K., Reed, D. & Leus, K. (2005). Indonesian proboscis monkey population and habitat viability assessment: final report.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Tuuga, A. & Higashi, S. (2009a). The feeding ecology and activity budget of proboscis monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 71(6), 478–92.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Tuuga, A. & Higashi, S. (2009b). Ranging behavior of proboscis monkeys in a riverine forest with special reference to ranging in inland forest. International Journal of Primatology, 30(2), 313–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, I., Kubo, T., Tuuga, A. & Higashi, S. (2010). A Bayesian analysis of the temporal change of local density of proboscis monkeys: implications for environmental effects on a multilevel society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 142(2), 235–45.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Tuuga, A. & Bernard, H. (2011a). Riverine refuging by proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) and sympatric primates: implications for adaptive benefits of the riverine habitat. Mammalian Biology, 76(2), 165–71.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Murai, T., Clauss, M., et al. (2011b). Regurgitation and remastication in the foregut-fermenting proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). Biology Letters, 7(5), 786–9.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Sha, J. C., Ortmann, S., et al. (2015). Excretion patterns of solute and different-sized particle passage markers in foregut-fermenting proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) do not indicate an adaptation for rumination. Physiology & Behavior, 149, 45–52.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Bernard, H., Tuuga, A., et al. (2018). Fecal nutrients suggest diets of higher fiber levels in free-ranging than in captive proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus). Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00246.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Nakabayashi, M., Otani, Y., et al. (2018a). Comparison of plant diversity and phenology of riverine and mangrove forests with those of the dryland forest in Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia. In Barnett, A. A., Matsuda, I. & Nowak, K. (eds) Primates in Flooded Habitats: Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuda, I., Abram, N. K., Stark, D. J., et al. (2018b). Population dynamics of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) over space and time, in the Lower Kinabatangan, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia. Oryx.Google Scholar
Meijaard, E. & Nijman, V. (2000a). Distribution and conservation of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 92(1), 15–24.Google Scholar
Meijaard, E. & Nijman, V. (2000b). The local extinction of the proboscis monkey Nasalis larvatus in Pulau Kaget Nature Reserve, Indonesia. Oryx, 34(1), 66–70.Google Scholar
Munshi-South, J. & Bernard, H. (2011). Genetic diversity and distinctiveness of the proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) of the Klias Peninsula, Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Heredity, 102(3), 342–6.Google Scholar
Murai, T., Mohamed, M., Bernard, H., et al. (2007). Female transfer between one-male groups of proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). Primates, 48(2), 117–21.Google Scholar
Muzani, (2014). Mangrove management in Indonesia from laws on coastal and small islands. Developing Country Studies, 4(25), 79–83.Google Scholar
Nowak, K. (2012). Mangrove and peat swamp forests: refuge habitats for primates and felids. Folia Primatologica, 83, 361–76.Google Scholar
Persey, S., Imanuddin, & Sadikin, L. (2011). A Practical Handbook for Conserving High Conservation Value Species and Habitats Within Oil Palm Landscapes. London: Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
Roper, K. M., Scheumann, M., Wiechert, A. B., et al. (2014). Vocal acoustics in the endangered proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). American Journal of Primatology, 76(2), 192–201.Google Scholar
RSPO. (2013). Principals and criteria for the production of sustainable palm oil 2013.Google Scholar
Salgado-Lynn, M. (2010). Primate Viability in a Fragmented Landscape: Genetic Diversity and Parasite Burden of Long-Tailed Macaques and Proboscis Monkeys in the Lower Kinabatangan Floodplain, Sabah, Malaysia. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Salter, R. E., MacKenzie, N. A., Nightingale, N., Aken, K. M. & Chai, P. K. P. (1985). Habitat use, ranging behaviour, and food habits of the proboscis monkey, Nasalis larvatus (van Wurmb), in Sarawak. Primates, 26(4), 436–51.Google Scholar
Sha, J. C. M. & Matsuda, I. (2016). Protecting the proboscis. Asian Geographic, 116, 34–9.Google Scholar
Sha, J. C. M., Bernard, H. & Nathan, S. (2008). Status and conservation of proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in Sabah, east Malaysia. Primate Conservation, 23(1), 107–20.Google Scholar
Sha, J. C., Alagappasamy, S., Chandran, S., Cho, K. M. & Guha, B. (2013). Establishment of a captive all-male group of proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) at the Singapore Zoo. Zoo Biology, 32(3), 281–90.Google Scholar
Soendjoto, M. A., Alikodra, H. S., Bismark, M. & Setijanto, H. (2005). Vegetasi tepi-baruh pada habitat bekantan (Nasalis larvatus) di hutan karet kabupaten Tabalong, Kalimantan Selatan. Biodiversitas, 6(1), 40–4.Google Scholar
Stark, D. J., Nijman, V., Lhota, S., Robins, J. G. & Goossens, B. (2012). Modeling population viability of local proboscis monkey Nasalis larvatus populations: conservation implications. Endangered Species Research, 16(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
Stark, D. J., Vaughan, I. P., Evans, L. J., et al. (2017a). Combining drones and satellite tracking as an effective tool for informing policy change in riparian habitats: a proboscis monkey case study. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. DOI: 10.1002/rse2.51.Google Scholar
Stark, D. J., Vaughan, I. P., Ramirez Saldivar, D. A., Nathan, S. K. & Goossens, B. (2017b). Evaluating methods for estimating home ranges using GPS collars: a comparison using proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus). PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0174891.Google Scholar
Stark, P. B. & Flaherty, J. (2017). The Only Negotiating Guide You’ll Ever Need, Revised and Updated: 101 Ways to Win Every Time in Any Situation. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Tangah, J. (2012). The Ecology and Behaviour of Proboscis Monkey (Nasalis Larvatus) in Mangrove Habitat of Labuk Bay, Sabah. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.Google Scholar
Thiry, V., Stark, D. J., Goossens, B., et al. (2016). Use and selection of sleeping sites by proboscis monkeys, Nasalis larvatus, along the Kinabatangan River, Sabah, Malaysia. Folia Primatologica, 87(3), 180–96.Google Scholar
Yeager, C. P. (1989). Feeding ecology of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). International Journal of Primatology, 10(6), 497–530.Google Scholar
Yeager, C. P. (1991). Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) social organization: intergroup patterns of association. American Journal of Primatology, 23(2), 73–86.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by