Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:48:39.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Effects on word recognition of syllable-onset cues to syllable-coda voicing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

John Local
Affiliation:
University of York
Richard Ogden
Affiliation:
University of York
Rosalind Temple
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is well known that syllables in many languages have longer vowels when their codas are voiced rather than voiceless (for English, cf. Jones 1972; House and Fairbanks 1953; Peterson and Lehiste 1960; for other languages, including exceptions, see Keating 1985). In English, the durational difference in stressed syllables can be 100 ms or more, and it is well established as one of the strongest perceptual cues to whether the coda is voiced or voiceless (e.g. Denes 1955; Chen 1970; Raphael 1972). More recently, van Santen, Coleman and Randolph (1992) showed for one General American speaker that this coda-dependent durational difference is not restricted to syllabic nuclei, but includes sonorant consonants, while Slater and Coleman (1996) showed that, for a British English speaker, the differences tended to be greatest in a confined region of the syllable, the specific location being determined by the syllable's segmental structure.

In a companion study to the present paper (Nguyen and Hawkins 1998; Hawkins and Nguyen, submitted), we confirmed the existence of the durational difference and showed that it is accompanied by systematic spectral differences in four accents of British English (one speaker per accent). For three speakers/accents, F2 frequency and the spectral centre of gravity (COG) in the /l/ were lower before voiced compared with voiceless codas, as illustrated in Figure 2.1. (The fourth speaker, not discussed further here, had a different pattern, consistent with the fact that his accent realises the /l/-/r/ contrast differently.)

Type
Chapter
Information
Phonetic Interpretation
Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI
, pp. 38 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×