Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:32:06.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Cohabitation and marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2009

By
Antony W. Dnes
Edited by
Antony W. Dnes  and
Robert Rowthorn
Antony W. Dnes
Affiliation:
Associate Dean and Research Professor University of Hertfordshire Business School, UK; Visiting Professor George Mason University Law School, Virginia, USA
Antony W. Dnes
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Robert Rowthorn
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Simple cohabitation occurs when a man and woman live together as though married but without completing any recognized marriage ceremony or meeting the requirements for common law marriage, where this exists. This least formal relationship has been growing in significance over recent decades. Such a quasi-married state carries fewer of the legal obligations that characterize marriage. In England there has been no legal recognition of common law marriage since an Act of Parliament of 1753. Among other things, this implies that one, home-owning, cohabiting party could eject another from a shared home without there being any claim on its value or services, although this position is currently under review by the Law Commission. In other countries, for example in some American states and in continental Europe, greater legal recognition of cohabitation is nonetheless usually limited compared with marriage. Where US states have recognized cohabitation contracts (for example, awarding “palimony” upon separation) as in Marvin v. Marvin (1976), they have done so under contract rather than family law.

Several questions are of great interest. Why would some men and women deliberately seek a set of lesser obligations towards each other? Is the trend towards cohabitation in some sense therefore supportive of the welfare of these couples? In that case, the trend might be judged to be efficient. Alternatively, are there barriers to marriage that could be removed to everybody's benefit? Finally, what is an appropriate response for the state, given the growth in cohabitation?

Type
Chapter
Information
The Law and Economics of Marriage and Divorce , pp. 118 - 131
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, J. and Lind, C. (1999), “A Matter of Trust: The Allocation of Rights in the Family Home,” Legal Studies, 19, 468–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1991), A Treatise on the Family, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Becker, G., Landes, E., and Michael, R. (1977), “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M. F. (2000), From Contract to Covenant, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A. D. (1972), “Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” Harvard Law Review, 85, 1089–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, J. and Brinig, M. F. (1991), “Rethinking Marriage: Feminist Ideology, Economic Change, and Divorce Reform,” Tulane Law Review, 65, 954–1010Google Scholar
Dnes, A. W. (1996), The Economics of Law, London: International Thomson Business Press
Dnes, A. W. (1998), “The Division of Marital Assets Following Divorce,” Journal of Law and Society, 25, 336–64CrossRef
Lewis, J., J. Datta, and S. Sarre (1999), Individualism and Commitment in Marriage and Cohabitation, Research Paper 8/99, London: Lord Chancellor's Department
Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. A. (1996), “Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 139–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. (1988), “A Theory of Marriage Timing,” American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popenoe, D. (1996), Life without Father, New York: Free Press
Posner, R. A. (1992), Sex and Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Scott, E. S. and Scott, R. E. (1998), “Marriage as a Relational Contract,” Virginia Law Review, 84, 1225–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, A. (1998), Report to the Lord Chancellor by the Ancillary Relief Advisory Group, London: Lord Chancellor's Department
Trebilcock, M. J. (1993), The Limits to Freedom of Contract, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press
Zelder, M. (1993), “Inefficient Dissolutions as a Consequence of Public Goods,” Journal of Legal Studies, 22, 503–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Cohabitation and marriage
    • By Antony W. Dnes, Associate Dean and Research Professor University of Hertfordshire Business School, UK; Visiting Professor George Mason University Law School, Virginia, USA
  • Edited by Antony W. Dnes, University of Hertfordshire, Robert Rowthorn, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Law and Economics of Marriage and Divorce
  • Online publication: 13 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Cohabitation and marriage
    • By Antony W. Dnes, Associate Dean and Research Professor University of Hertfordshire Business School, UK; Visiting Professor George Mason University Law School, Virginia, USA
  • Edited by Antony W. Dnes, University of Hertfordshire, Robert Rowthorn, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Law and Economics of Marriage and Divorce
  • Online publication: 13 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Cohabitation and marriage
    • By Antony W. Dnes, Associate Dean and Research Professor University of Hertfordshire Business School, UK; Visiting Professor George Mason University Law School, Virginia, USA
  • Edited by Antony W. Dnes, University of Hertfordshire, Robert Rowthorn, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Law and Economics of Marriage and Divorce
  • Online publication: 13 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328.007
Available formats
×