Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:48:47.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Stabilized Finite Element Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Max D. Gunzburger
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Roy A. Nicolaides
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Physically the Stokes equations model “slow” flows of incompressible fluids or alternatively isotropic incompressible elastic materials. In Computational Fluid Dynamics, however, the Stokes equations have become an important model problem for designing and analyzing finite element algorithms. The reason being, that some of the problems encountered when solving the full Navier-Stokes equations are already present in the more simple Stokes equations. In particular, it gives the right setting for studying the stability problem connected with the choice of finite element spaces for the velocity and the pressure. It is well known that these spaces cannot be chosen independently when the discretization is based on the “Galerkin” variational form. This method belongs to the class of saddle-point problems for which an abstract theory has been developed by Brezzi [1974] and Babuska [1973]. The theory shows that the method is optimally convergent if the finite element spaces for velocity and pressure satisfy the “Babuska-Brezzi” or “inf-sup” condition. In computations the violation of this condition often leads to unphysical pressure oscillations and a “locking” of the velocity field, cf. Hughes [1987]. During the last decade this problem has been studied thoroughly and various velocity-pressure combinations have been shown to satisfy the Babuska-Brezzi condition. Unfortunately, however, it has turned out that many seemingly natural combinations do not satisfy it. (See Girault and Raviart [1986], Brezzi and Fortin [1991], and references therein.)

In this chapter we will review a recent technique of “stabilizing” mixed methods. In this approach the standard Galerkin form is modified by the addition of mesh-dependent terms which are weighted residuals of the differential equations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics
Trends and Advances
, pp. 87 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×