Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:52:00.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Understanding global hydrology

from Part I - Understanding ‘water’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Brian L. Finlayson
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Murray C. Peel
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Thomas A. McMahon
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
R. Quentin Grafton
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Karen Hussey
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we set out to discuss surface hydrology at the global scale and in doing so we will place emphasis on surface runoff, both direct and as baseflow, since this is the harvestable part of the hydrologic cycle. Of all the freshwater on Earth, only about 0.3% is surface water while the rest is frozen in the ice caps and glaciers or in the groundwater (Gleick, 1996). Yet it is this surface water that we are most familiar with and that, globally, provides 83% of the water we use (2030 Water Resources Group, 2009). It is runoff that constitutes the water resource. Part of the flow of rivers can come from groundwater (as baseflow) and in particular locations groundwater can be the most important water source. Also, we will concentrate on ‘natural’ hydrology, rather than hydrology as impacted by water resources development. It is, however, becoming increasingly difficult to isolate natural hydrology from hydrology as affected by human impacts. There are few major river systems that are not now significantly regulated. For example, the Yangtze River basin in China, with an area of 1808500 km2, is estimated to contain 50 000 dams – an average of one dam for every 36 km2 of basin area and providing a total storage capacity nearly one-quarter of the annual flow of the river. Some 64% of the total storage capacity is in 119 large reservoirs, each greater than 0.1 × 109 m3 (Yang et al., 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,2030 Water Resources Group (2009). Charting Our Water Future: Economic Frameworks to Inform Decision Making. McKinsey and Co. Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/Water/Charting_our_water_future.aspx, accessed 10 April 2010.Google Scholar
Adam, J. C. and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2003). Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 108(D9), 4257, doi:10.1029/2002JD002499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andréassian, V. (2004). Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. Journal of Hydrology, 291, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibold, O. W. (1995). Ecology of World Vegetation. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asdak, C., Jarvis, P. G., Gardingen, P. and Fraser, A. (1998). Rainfall interception loss in unlogged and logged forest areas of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Hydrology, 206, 237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. E., Zhang, L., McMahon, T. A. and Vertessy, R. A. (2005). A review of paired catchments for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. Journal of Hydrology, 310, 28–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, V. T. (ed.) (1964). Handbook of Applied Hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Crockford, R. H. and Richardson, D. P. (2000). Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, streamflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes, 14, 2903–20.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martonne, E. (1927). Regions of interior basin drainage. Geographical Review, 17, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A. (2009). Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 913–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, B., Peel, M. and McMahon, T. (2009). Climate and rivers. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters, Volume 3, ed. Likens, G. E.. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 344–56.Google Scholar
,FISRWG (1998). Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. FISRWG (10/1998), Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG) (15 Federal agencies of the US government). GPO Item No. 0120-A, SuDocs No. A 57.6/2: EN 3/PT.653.
Gash, J. H. C. and Shuttleworth, W. J. (1991). Tropical deforestation: albedo and the surface-energy balance. Climatic Change, 19, 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, P. H. (1996). Water resources. In Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather, Volume 2, ed. Schneider, S. H.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 817–23.Google Scholar
Goodall, D. W. and Perry, R. A. (eds) (1981). Arid Land Ecosystems: Structure, Functioning, and Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Haines, A. T., Finlayson, B. L. and McMahon, T. A. (1988). A global classification of river regimes. Applied Geography, 8, 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschy, R. W. (2009). Streamflow Measurement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hornbeck, J. W. (1965). Accuracy in Streamflow Measurements on the Fernow Experimental Forest, Research Note NE-29, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeast Forest Experiment Station, 8 pp.
Hurrell, J. W. (1995). Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science, 269, 676–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moine, N., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C. and Michel, C. (2007). How can rainfall–runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study based on 1040 French catchments. Water Resources Research, 43, W06428, doi:10.1029/2006WR005608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantua, N. J. and Hare, S. R. (2002). The Pacific decadal oscillation. Journal of Oceanography, 58, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazor, E. (1995). Stagnant aquifer concept Part 1. Large-scale artesian systems: Great Artesian basin, Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 173, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T. A. and Finlayson, B. L. (1995). Reservoir system management and environmental flows. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, 1, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T. A. and Finlayson, B. L. (2003). Droughts and anti-droughts: the low flow hydrology of Australian rivers. Freshwater Biology, 48, 1147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T. A., Finlayson, B. L., Haines, A. T. and Srikanthan, R. (1992). Global Runoff: Continental Comparisons of Annual Flows and Peak Discharges. Cremlingen: Catena Verlag, 166 pp.Google Scholar
McMahon, T. A., Vogel, R. M., Pegram, G. G. S., Peel, M. C. and Etkin, D. (2007). Global streamflows, Part 2. Reservoir storage: yield performance. Journal of Hydrology, 347, 260–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milly, P. C. D. and Dunne, K. A. (2002). 1. Quantifying errors in the estimation of basin mean precipitation. Water Resources Research, 38, 1205, doi:10.1029/2001/WR000759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisawa, M.E. (1985). Rivers, Form and Process. Geomorphology Texts 7. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peel, M. C. (1999). ‘Annual runoff variability in a global context.’ Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.
Peel, M. C., McMahon, T. A., Finlayson, B. L. and Watson, F. G. R. (2001). Identification and explanation of continental differences in the variability of annual runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 250, 224–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, M. C., McMahon, T. A. and Finlayson, B. L. (2004). Continental differences in the variability of annual runoff: update and reassessment. Journal of Hydrology, 295, 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. and McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrological and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, M. C., McMahon, T. A. and Finlayson, B. L. (2010). Vegetation impact on mean annual evapotranspiration at a global catchment scale. Water Resources Research, 46, WO9508 doi: 10.1029/2009 WK 008233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 193, 120–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pook, E. W., Moore, P. H. R. and Hall, T. (1991). Rainfall interception by trees of Pinus radiata, and Eucalyptus viminalis, in a 1300 mm rainfall area of southeastern New South Wales: I. Gross losses and their variability. Hydrological Processes, 5, 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressland, A. J. (1973). Rainfall partitioning by an arid woodland (Acacia aneura F. Muell.) in south-western Queensland. Australian Journal of Botany, 21, 235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. (2000). The influence of physical and physiological characteristics of vegetation on their hydrological response. Hydrological Processes, 14, 2885–901.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, M. L., Hobbins, M. T. and Farquhar, G. D. (2009a). Pan evaporation trends and the terrestrial water balance. I. Principles and observations. Geography Compass, 3, 746–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, M. L., Hobbins, M. T. and Farquhar, G. D. (2009b). Pan evaporation trends and the terrestrial water balance. II. Energy balance and interpretation. Geography Compass, 3, 761–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropelevski, C. F. and Halpert, M. S. (1987). Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Monthly Weather Review, 115, 1606–26.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N. and Yamagata, T. (1999). A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature, 401, 360–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strangeways, I. (2007). Precipitation: Theory, Measurement and Distribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, F. I. (1987). Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, S. L., Zhang, J., Zhu, J.et al. (2005). Impact of dams on Yangtze River sediment supply to the sea and delta intertidal wetland response. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, F03006, doi:10.1029/2004JF000271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×