Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T03:49:14.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Socio-cultural-historical psychology: some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of culturalgenetic methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Cole
Affiliation:
University of California
James V. Wertsch
Affiliation:
Clark University, Massachusetts and Washington University, St Louis
Pablo del Rio
Affiliation:
Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
Get access

Summary

Preliminary remarks

Before focusing on the main theme of this chapter, I feel it necessary to say a few words about the current circumstances confronting psychologists who take the social and cultural foundations of human nature as the starting point for their analyses. While such approaches to psychology remain distinctly minority viewpoints within our discipline, it is my impression that they are receiving more attention than at any time since the 1920s and certainly in my professional lifetime. This situation offers pleasant prospects of increased support and recognition. But it also poses dangers: Nowhere are these ideas so highly developed that it is possible to refer to them as a mature scientific paradigm with generally accepted theoretical foundations, a methodology, and a well-delineated set of prescriptions for relating theory to practice. It is my hope that the first meeting of the Society for Sociocultural Research will further the goal of formulating an ecumenical and broadly useful approach to the inclusion of culture and the social world in our theories and practices.

Assuming I am correct about the increasing popularity of the ideas discussed herein, it is possible to identify many causes for this interest: Disenchantment with positivist social sciences more generally, the erosion of support for Piagetian theory among developmentalists, skepticism about the terms in which the study of artificial intelligence is being pursued, despair at the fractionation of psychology, and the search for viable alternatives to various kinds of social learning theory would be some of my candidate factors, but many others could be offered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×