Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T04:17:33.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER I - Introduction: The Inputs for Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Robert M. Solow
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Peter Temin
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

The purpose of this volume is to advance our understanding of industrial development by describing the progress of what economists call the ‘factors of production’, i.e. the inputs out of which food, clothing, and shelter are made. It is by no means clear, however, that the increase in our ability to produce food, clothing, and shelter that we call ‘the industrial revolution’ was a direct result of an increase in the factors of production. In fact, the relation between the traditional factors of production – land, labour, and capital – and the ability of an economy to produce is far more complex than the use of the words ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ might suggest. We therefore introduce the discussion of the factors of production by an attempt to set forward the relations between these factors and industrial development that is the subject of this book.

It is a great abstraction to talk of the economy as a whole and of only a few factors of production. The uses of such an abstraction are obvious: it enables us to make generalizations, to compare countries with each other, and to direct our research into areas of potential usefulness. But there are also limitations to this usefulness, limitations that are directly related to the ability of this abstraction to tell us something interesting about a complex world. The relationship between the factors of production and the process of industrialization to be described shortly holds good only under a variety of restrictive assumptions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chenery, H., ‘Patterns of Industrial Growth’, American Economic Review, L (1960)Google Scholar
Cole, W. A. and Deane, Phyllis, ‘The Growth of National Incomes’, in CEHE, vi (Cambridge, 1965).Google Scholar
Deane, P. M. and Cole, W. A., British Economic Growth, 1688–1959 (Cambridge, 1962)
Denison, E. F., Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, 1967.
Denison, E. F., ‘Some Major Issues in Productivity Analysis: A Review of Estimates by Jorgenson and Griliches’, Survey of Current Business, XLIX (1969).Google Scholar
Domar, E. D., ‘On the Measurement of Technological Change’, Economic Journal, LXXI (1961).Google Scholar
Flinn, M. W., ‘Trends in Real Wages, 1750–1850’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xxvii (1974).Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A., Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass., 1962.
Harcourt, G. C., ‘Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital’, Journal of Economic Literature, VII (1969).Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. and Hartwell, R. M., ‘The Standard of Living during the Industrial Revolution: A Discussion’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xvi (1963–4)Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D. W. and Griliches, Z., ‘The Explanation of Productivity Change’, Review of Economic Studies, xxxiv (1967)Google Scholar
Kendrick, J. W., ‘Some Theoretical Aspects of Capital Measurement’, American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, LI (1961)Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon, ‘Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: II’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, v (1957)Google Scholar
Robinson, J., ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital’, Review of Economic Studies, xxi (1953–4)Google Scholar
Rudé, G. E., ‘Prices, Wages and Popular Movements in Paris during the French Revolution’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., vi (1953–4).Google Scholar
Schmookler, J., Invention and Economic Growth (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).
Scott, Ira O. Jr, ‘The Gerschenkron Hypothesis of Index Number Bias’, Review of Economics and Statistics, xxxiv (November 1952).Google Scholar
Solow, R. M., ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, xxxix (1957).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×