Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T14:42:23.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aerodynamic characteristics of low-drag bicycle wheels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. I. Greenwell
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath Bath, UK
N. J. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath Bath, UK
E. K. L. Bridge
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath Bath, UK
R. J. Addy
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath Bath, UK

Abstract

A number of modern “aerodynamic” bicycle wheels were tested at full scale speeds in a windtunnel. The effects of wheel geometry, rotational speed and cross winds on drag force, side force and yawing moment were investigated.

Compared with a conventional spoked wheel, all the “aerodynamic” wheels were found to give similar improvements in drag of approximately 25%. In cross wind conditions, aerodynamic characteristics were strongly dependent on wheel geometry, but essentially independent of wheel rotational speed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kyle, C.R. and Burke, E. Improving the racing bicycle, Mechanical Engineering, September 1984, pp 3445.Google Scholar
2. Stone, H. Air power, Cycling Plus, July 1993, (18), pp 7175.Google Scholar
3. Zdravkovich, M.M. Aerodynamics of bicycle wheel and frame, J Wind Eng and Ind Aerodynamics, 1992, 40, pp 5570.Google Scholar
4. Daugherty, A.E. A study of the drag reduction of a two-wheel human-powered vehicle, AIAA-83-0655, January 1983.Google Scholar
5. Hopkins, M.W., Principe, F.S. and Kelleher, K.J. Beyond Materials: Du Pont's Aerodynamic Bicycle Wheel, Proceedings of 35th International SAMPE Symposium, Anaheim CA, 2-5 April 1990.Google Scholar
6.The resistance of aeroplane undercarriages of two types, and of wheels with various forms of covers, ARC R&M 579, February 1919.Google Scholar
7. Krishnaswamy, T.N., Rao, G.N.V. and Reddy, K.R. Blockage corrections for large bluff bodies near a wall in a close jet wind tunnel, J Aircraft, October 1973,10, (10), pp 634636.Google Scholar
8. Prandtl, L. Applications of modern hydrodynamics to aeronautics, NACA Report 116, 1921.Google Scholar