Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:27:27.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cowl Shapes of Minimum Drag in Supersonic Flow

Part 1. Comparison of the Guderley and Newtonian Optima

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

E. Angus Boyd*
Affiliation:
The College of Aeronautics, Cranfield

Extract

Guderley, Armitage and Valentine have computed the inlet and closed body contours which form the forepart of an axially symmetric body, of given length and fineness ratio, having minimum pressure drag. The solution is not based on a simplified pressure law, such as the Newtonian impact law, because by a suitable choice of control surface for mass flow and momentum they are able to employ the general flow equations. It is clear, however, from an analysis of their tabulated results that their cowl shapes fall on a single curve for a given value of Δ=didt, the ratio of the initial to the final diameter of the cowl, when plotted in terms of a dimensionless length ξ=x/l and thickness η=y/dt, as in Fig. 1. Furthermore Fig. 1 shows that, except for small values of Δ, the Guderley shapes are indistinguishable from the optimum shapes calculated from Newtonian impact theory. The shape and characteristics of the Newtonian duct of given length and thickness, offering minimum drag to the external stream, are derived using the slender-body approximation. Ducts for which Δ > 0.04 are shown to be sufficiently slender. The slopes of those with 0 ≤ Δ < 0.04 are too large only in a small critical region near the nose. Thus slender body theory will give a close approximation to the exact Newtonian solution even in these cases. For the larger values of Δ likely to be used in practice slender body theory is valid everywhere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Guderley, K. G., Armitage, J. V. and Valentine, E. M. Nose and Inlet Shapes of Minimum Drag in Supersonic Flow. ARL 62-342, 1962. Aeronautical Research Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.Google Scholar
2.Miele, A. Slender Shapes of Minimum Drag in Newtonian Flow. Zeitschrift filr Flugwissenschaften, May 1963.Google Scholar
3.Leitmann, G. (Editor). Optimisation Techniques with Applications to Aerospace Systems. Chapter 4. Academic Press 1962.Google Scholar