Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T00:18:56.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Ambiguity in Marx's and Engels's Account of Justice and Equality1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1982

Alan Gilbert
Alan Gilbert*
Affiliation:
University of Denver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given the widespread moral conventionalism or historicism in contemporary social science and ethics, many have viewed Marx as arguing either that conceptions of justice simply shift historically and lack objectivity (relativism) or that notions of justice are to be understood solely as expressions of class interests (reductionism). Although metaethical ambiguities about the status of conceptions of justice influenced some of Marx's and Engels's formulations, they condemned the “crying contrasts” of rich and poor. Marx is better understood as defending a version of moral objectivity or moral realism. The paper begins with an example from the recent debate about justice in the international distribution of wealth to highlight the implausibility of a relativist or reductionist account. It then describes alternative views of the status of justice and equality in Marx and Engels and explores the logical structure of Marx's critique of Proudhon. A fourth section examines the analogy between Marx's and Engels's realism in the philosophy of science and their realist arguments in ethics, focusing on Marx's and Engels's non-relativist and non-reductionist conception of moral progress. The conclusion sets Marx's use of concepts of exploitation in the context of his overall moral judgments and suggests that Marx's social or historical theory rather than his moral standards are the most controversial part of his ethical argument.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 328 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am indebted to Nicholas Sturgeon and Richard Boyd for helpful criticisms of this paper, and to Allen Wood for several enlightening conversations about these issues.

References

Althusser, Louis. 1965. Lire le capital, 2 vols. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Avinero, Shlomo. 1972. Hegel's theory of the modern state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard N. 1979. Metaphor and theory change: what is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for? In Ortony, Andrew, ed. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard N. 1980. Scientific realism and naturalistic epistemology. Unpublished.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1980.2.192615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. 1966. The Caucasian chalk circle. Trans. Bentley, Edward. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1979. Mrx's theory of history: a defense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, David. 1977. Revolution and counterrevolution in Chile. Denver: Graduate School of International Studies Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Dobb, Maurice. 1973. Theories of value and distribution since Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511559457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1966. Herr Eugen Dühring's revolution in science. New York: International.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1962. Preface to the second volume of Capital in Marx and Engels. Selected works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1962. The housing question. In Marx, and Engels, . Selected Works.Google Scholar
Fisk, Milton. 1975. History and reason in Rawls' moral theory. In Daniels, Norman, ed. Reading Rawls. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Förder, Herwig et al. 1970. Der Bund der Kommunisten: Dokumente und Materialen. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1978a. Equality and social theory in Rawls' A theory of justice . The Occasional Review, 8:95–117.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1978b. Marx on internationalism and war. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7:346–69.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1979. Social theory and revolutionary activity in Marx. The American Political Science Review, 73:521–38.10.2307/1954895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1981a. Historical theory and the structure of moral argument in Marx. Political Theory, 9:173–205.10.1177/009059178100900203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1981b. Moral realism, individuality and justice in war. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1981c. Social science and the common good in Weber and Lenin. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1981. Marx's politics: communists and citizens. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press and Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975. Lectures on the philosophy of world history: introduction. Trans. Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. The philosophy of right. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1962. Leviathan. Ed. Oakeshott, Michael. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Husami, Ziyad I. 1980. Marx on distributive justice. In Cohen, Marshall, Nagel, Thomas and Scanlon, Thomas, ed., Marx, justice and history. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Reprinted from Philosophy and Public Affairs 1978.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1967. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1974. Collected works, 45 vols. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1979. An essay concerning human understanding. Ed. Nidditch, Peter. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. 1976. Ethical relativism and the problem of incoherence. Ethics, 86:107–21.10.1086/291985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, David. 1977. Human rights and the general welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6:113–29.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1961. Capital, 3 vols. Trans. Moore, Samuel and Aveling, Edward. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1973. Grundrisse. Trans. Nicolaus, Martin. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1963. The poverty of philosophy. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1962. Selected works, 2 vols. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1959. Werke, 39 vols. Berin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1971. Writings on the Paris Commune. Ed. Draper, Hal. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert S. 1973. One hundred countries, two billion people. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard W. 1978. Aristotle and Marx: the unity of two opposites. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de. 1965. Spirit of the laws. Trans. Nugent, Thomas. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1965. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1970. The challenge of world poverty. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1975. On human conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Payre, Cheryl. 1975. The debt trap. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. 1924. De la capacité politique des classes ouvrières. Paris: Rivière.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. 1923. Système des contradictions économiques ou philosophie de la misère. Paris: Riviere.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. Collected philosophical papers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1948. The principles of political economy and taxation. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1976. The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1979. Let us not be hypocritical. Daedalus, 108:1–25.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1965. Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226226453.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1980. Brandt's moral empiricism. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1973. Neutrality in political science. In Ryan, Alan, ed. The philosophy of social explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 1971. The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and present, 50:76–136.10.1093/past/50.1.76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotsky, Leon. 1963. Basic writings. Ed. Howe, Irving. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W. 1977. The inequality of nations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958a. From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958b. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Trans. Parsons, Talcott. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Wittke, Carl. 1950. The Utopian communist: a biography of Wilhelm Weitling. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1979. Marx on right and justice: A reply to Husami. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 8:267–95.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1972. The Marxian critique of justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1:241–82.Google Scholar