Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T12:21:31.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Conditions and National Elections, Post-Sample Forecasts of the Kramer Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1982

H. Sonmez Atesoglu  and
Roger Congleton
H. Sonmez Atesoglu
Affiliation:
Clarkson College of Technology
Roger Congleton
Affiliation:
Clarkson College of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has long been a division of opinion among economists concerning the effects of economic developments on voting behavior. In his well-known study, Kramer (1971a) concluded that the fluctuations in economic activity have a systematic influence on U.S. congressional elections. His findings were challenged by various economists, including Stigler (1973).

The purpose of this paper is to extend the analysis of Kramer's results by examining the post-sample forecast performance of his models. As noted by Christ (1966, pp. 546–49), the acid test of a time series model is its ability to perform well outside the sample period. The results discussed below demonstrate that Kramer's equations have relatively good post-sample predictive ability. The findings thus support the view that short-term economic fluctuations have important effects on national elections. However, the results also suggest that economic factors alone are not sufficient to account for all variations of voter behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 873 - 875
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christ, C. F. 1966. Econometric models and methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kramer, G. 1971a. Short term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review 65:131–43.10.2307/1955049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, G. 1971b. Short term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964, rev. Bobbs Merrill Reprint Series.10.2307/1955049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, D. 1977. A political model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy 85:239–63.10.1086/260561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, T. 1975. Selecting economic hypotheses by goodness of fit. The Economic Journal 85:877–83.10.2307/2230630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, P. A. 1973. The practice of political economy. American Economic Review 63:168–71.Google Scholar
Okun, A. M. 1973. Comments on Stigler's paper. American Economic Review 63:172–80.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1973. General economic conditions and national elections. American Economic Review 63:160–67.Google Scholar