Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:38:16.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of isolation from females and mating frequency on the sexual behaviour and semen quality of young post-pubertal boars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. H. Hemsworth ,
C. G. Winfield ,
C. Hansen  and
A. W. Makin
P. H. Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
C. G. Winfield
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
C. Hansen
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
A. W. Makin
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Three treatments were imposed on three groups of four boars from 26 to 40 weeks of age: a mating frequency of six copulations per week, housed near sexually receptive gilts (M + ♂); not mated, housed near sexually receptive gilts (NM + ♂); and not mated, isolated from female pigs (NM – ♂ ). The M + ♂ boars had similar semen characteristics from 49 to 57 weeks of age to the NM + ♂ and NM – ♂ boars. However, the M + ♂ boars achieved a significantly greater number of copulations (P < 0·05) and spent significantly longer ejaculating (P < 0·05) during the mating tests conducted from 49 to 57 weeks and from 66 to 70 weeks of age than the NM – ♂ boars. It is concluded that isolating young post-pubertal boars from female pigs will reduce their subsequent copulatory performance. Further, mating at a high frequency from 26 to 40 weeks of age does not appear to seriously affect subsequent semen quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 49 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Galloway, D. B. 1966. The examination of bulls for breeding soundness. Victorian Vet. Proc. 24: 36–39.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. 1957. The morphology of boar spermatozoa. J. L R. microsc. Soc. 76: 84–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P. H., Beilharz, R. G. and Galloway, D. B. 1977a. The influence of social conditions during rearing on the sexual behaviour of the domestic boar. Anim. Prod. 24: 245–251.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Findlay, J. K. and Beilharz, R. G. 1978. The importance of physical contact with other pigs during rearing on the sexual behaviour of the male domestic pig. Anim. Prod. 27: 201–207.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Winfield, C. G., Beilharz, R. G. and Galloway, D. B. 1977b. Influence of social conditions post-puberty on the sexual behaviour of the domestic male pig. Anim. Prod. 25: 305–109.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Winfield, C. G. and Chamley, W. A. 1981. The influence of the presence of the female on the sexual behaviour and plasma testosterone levels of the male pig. Anim. Prod. 32: 61–65.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. and Varley, M. A. 1980. Reproduction in the Pig, pp. 196–210. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Lagerlōff, N. 1934. [Morphological investigation of variations in the sperm and testicles of bulls with impaired fertility.] Ada path, microbiol. scand. Suppl. 19.Google Scholar
Swierstra, E. E. 1968. A comparison of spermatozoa production and spermatozoa output of Yorkshire and Lacombe boars. J. Reprod. Fert. 17: 459–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swierstra, E. E. 1971. Sperm production of boars as measured from epididymal sperm reserves and quantitative testicular histology. J. Reprod. Fert. 27: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swierstra, E. E. 1974. A comparison of regular ejaculation with sexual rest on semen characteristics and reproductive organ weights in young boars. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 575–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed