Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:40:38.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MOET breeding schemes for wool sheep 2. Selection for adult fleece traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. R. Wray
Affiliation:
Livestock Improvement Unit, Victorian Institute of Animal Science, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood 3049, Victoria, Australia
M. E. Goddard
Affiliation:
Livestock Improvement Unit, Victorian Institute of Animal Science, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood 3049, Victoria, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Benefits of collection of annual versus a single fleece record are investigated for breeding programmes of Australian Merino sheep. Breeding scheme alternatives are based on natural mating (N) or multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET). The breeding objective is assumed to be an adult fleece trait which is expressed annually from a minimum of age 2 years, with a unity genetic correlation between annual records. Initial selection of parents can occur prior to the availability of their adult records, based on records collected at 6,12 or 18 months which have a maximum genetic correlation of 0·8 with the adult trait. Monte Carlo simulation is used to compare breeding programme alternatives, which allows overlapping generations and selection across age groups. MOET schemes select parents of minimum age 19 months in adult (A) schemes, 7 months in juvenile (J) schemes or 13 months when there are two breeding seasons per year. Natural mating results in an average of 1·09 lambs per ewe mated, whilst embryo transfer success rates follow realistic distributions (only 70% of donors giving live lambs) with an average of 3·45 lambs per donor flushed. Estimated breeding values, on which selection is based, are calculated by multiple trait selection index of an individual's own records or by multivariate best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). In J schemes 7-month-old lambs may be selected on the basis of a pedigree index if no individual record has been collected at 6 months of age. Breeding scheme alternatives are compared on the basis of genetic response, rate of inbreeding and economic ‘income’ which is calculated as genetic response reduced for inbreeding depression, cumulated and discounted over a medium time horizon (14 years). The quantitative benefits of the collection of annual records are dependent on the choice of genetic and phenotypic parameters between traits, but these were chosen from the literature to be representative of annual fleece weight records in Merino sheep. Genetic response to selection and ‘income’ associated with the adult trait is increased by at least 15% in N, A and J schemes compared with when only a single record is collected at 18 months. The advantage of MOET over N schemes and the optimum number of sires to use is unchanged, but the average age of sires is increased. Both annual rate of inbreeding and average age of dams are unchanged. In N schemes, 80% of the benefits of collecting annual records on both sexes can be achieved by collecting records on males alone, whilst in MOET schemes measurement of dams contributes up to 50% of the benefit of the measurement of both sexes. Since MOET schemes have fewer dams to be recorded, the cost-effectiveness of collecting records on females is much higher than in natural mating schemes. Breeding programmes operating two mating seasons each year are found to be a viable alternative to J schemes: although genetic response is less, rate of inbreeding is also less, so that ‘income’ response is approximately equal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, K. D. 1987. Potential response to selection in Merino sheep given current industry structure and selection practices. In Merino improvement programs in Australia, (ed. McGuirk, B. J.), pp. 299312. Australian Wool Corporation Technical Publication.Google Scholar
Atkins, K. D. 1990. Incorporating parameters for lifetime productivity into breeding objectives for sheep. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XV, pp. 1726.Google Scholar
Atkins, K. D. and Mortimer, S. I. 1987. The relationship between hogget and adult wool traits in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics 6: 7982.Google Scholar
Casey, A. E. 1990. The ability of N.S.W. Merino ram breeders to utilise an efficient two stage sire selection strategy. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Production 18: 168171.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3rd ed. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, R. W. 1986. A profit equation for the definition of breeding objective in Australian Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 103: 342357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, J. and Hill, W. G. 1976. Effect of sampling error on efficiency of selection indices. 2. Use of information on associated traits for improvement of a single important trait. Animal Production 23: 114.Google Scholar
Villanueva, B., Wray, N. R. and Thompson, R. 1993. Prediction of asymptotic rates of response from selection on multiple traits using univariate and multivariate best linear unbiased predictors. Animal Production 57: 113.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G. and Thompson, R. 1992. Univariate and multivariate parameter estimates for milk production using an animal model. II. Efficiency of selection when using simplified covariance structures. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 24: 431447.Google Scholar
Wray, N. R. and Goddard, M. E. 1994. MOET breeding schemes for wool sheep. I. Design alternatives. Animal Production 59: 7186Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Brown, G. H., Turner, H. N. and Dolling, C. H. S. 1965. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for body weight and greasy fleece weight at weaning in Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 9971009.Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, H. N. and Dolling, C. H. S. 1960. Comparison of estimates of repeatability and heritability for some production traits in Merino rams and ewes. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 11: 604617.Google Scholar