Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T15:47:32.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The similarity problem for tensor products of certain C*-algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Florin Pop
Florin Pop
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wagner College, Staten Island, N.Y. 10301, United States of America, e-mail: fpop@wagner.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We prove that every bounded representation of the tensor product of two C*-algebras, one of which is nuclear and contains matrices of any order, is similar to a *-representation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , December 2004 , pp. 385 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2004

References

[1]Christensen, E., ‘Extensions of derivations II’, Math. Scand. 50 (1982), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Christensen, E., ‘Finite von Neumann algebra factors with property Γ’, J. Funct. Anal. 186 (2001), 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Haagerup, U., ‘Solution of the similarity problem for cyclic representations of C *-algebras’, Ann. Math. 188 (1983), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kadison, R.V., ‘On the orthogonalization of operator representations’, Amer. J. Math. 77 (1955), 600–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Paulsen, V.I., ‘Completely bounded homomorphisms of operator algebras’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 92 (1984), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Pisier, G., ‘The similarity degree of an operator algebra’, St. Petersburg Math. J. 10 (1999), 103–146.Google Scholar
[7]Pisier, G., ‘Similarity problems and length’, Taiwanese J. Math. 5 (2001), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Pisier, G., ‘Remarks on the similarity degree of an operator algebra’, Internat. J. Math. 12 (2001), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar