Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:04:28.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in attack by the mahogany shoot borer, Hypsipyla grandella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in relation to host growth and phenology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A.C. Newton ,
J.P. Cornelius ,
J.F. Mesén ,
E.A. Corea  and
A.D. Watt
A.C. Newton*
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE), Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 OQB, UK:
J.P. Cornelius*
Affiliation:
Proyecto Mejoramiento Genético Forestal, Centro Agronómico de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), Turrialba 7170, Costa Rica
J.F. Mesén
Affiliation:
Proyecto Mejoramiento Genético Forestal, Centro Agronómico de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), Turrialba 7170, Costa Rica
E.A. Corea
Affiliation:
Proyecto Mejoramiento Genético Forestal, Centro Agronómico de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), Turrialba 7170, Costa Rica
A.D. Watt
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE), Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 OQB, UK:
*
*The Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, Darwin Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JU, UK. Fax: 0131 662 0478 E-mail: a.newton@ed.ac.uk
**Overseas Development Administration, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to evaluate the relationships between attacks by the mahogany shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) and host growth and phenology, field trials of Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla established in Costa Rica were assessed intensively over an 84 week period. Height growth of C. odorata was approximately twice that of S. macrophylla, with mean growth rates of 2.0 and 1.3 cm week−1 respectively. Cedrela odorata displayed pronounced temporal variation in leaf phenology, with a minimum of 51% of trees in leaf during a relatively dry period. In contrast, the minimum proportion of foliated S. macrophylla trees was 87%. No shoot borer attacks were recorded on S. macrophylla until week 50 after the onset of assessments, whereas initial attacks of C. odorata were recorded during week 6. By week 84, the proportion of trees attacked was 74% and 77%, respectively. In both species, attacks were concentrated in seasonal peaks, coinciding with the production of new shoots. Pronounced spatial variation in attack was observed in both species. At week 12, the number of attacks per block in C. odorata was negatively correlated with available calcium concentration (r=0.85, P<0.001), whereas mean height growth of C. odorata was positively correlated with available phosphate concentration (r=0.84; P<0.0001). Significant variation in height to first damaging attack was observed in both species. By the end of the observational period, only 6% of C. odorata and 0.4% S. macrophylla remained undamaged to a height of 3 m. It is suggested that control methods for the mahogany shoot borer should take account of temporal dynamics in attack, and relationship to host phenology. Manipulation of the soil nutrient status may also form part of an integrated approach to pest management.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 319 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertsch, F. (1986) Manual para interpretar la fertilidad de los suelos de Costa Rica. San José, Costa Rica, Oficina de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Cock, M.W. (Ed.) (1985) A review of the biological control of pests in the Caribbean and Bermuda up to 1982. CIBC Technical Communication 9, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Trinidad.Google Scholar
Dourojeanni, R.R. (1963) El barreno de los brotes (Hypsipyla grandella) en cedro y caoba. Agronomía 30, 35–43.Google Scholar
Gara, R.I., Allan, G.G., Wilkins, R.M. & Whitmore, J.L. (1973) Flight and host selection behaviour of the mahogany shootborer, Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Phyticidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 72, 259–266.Google Scholar
Grijpma, P. (1974) Contributions to an integrated control programme of Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) in Costa Rica. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen, Netherlands, Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen.Google Scholar
Grijpma, P. (1976) Resistance of Meliaceae against the shoot borer Hypsipyla with particular reference to Toona ciliata M. J. Roem. var australis (F. v. Muell.) C.D.C. pp. 69–78in Burley, J. & Styles, B.T. (Eds) Tropical trees: variation, breeding and conservation. London, Linnean Society.Google Scholar
Grijpma, P. & Gara, R.I. (1970a) Studies on the shootborer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller). I. Host selection behaviour. Turrialba 20, 233–240.Google Scholar
Grijpma, P. & Gara, R.I. (1970b) Studies on the shootborer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller). II. Host preference of the larva. Turrialba 20, 241–247.Google Scholar
Holsten, E.H. (1977) Mating behaviour of the mahogany shoot borer, Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller). (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Costa Rica. PhD Thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Howard, F.W. (1991) Seasonal incidence of shoot infestation by mahogany shoot borer (Lepidoptera: Phyticidae) in Florida. Florida Entomologist 74, 150–151.Google Scholar
Howard, F.W. & Meerow, A.W. (1993) Effect of mahogany shoot borer on growth of West Indies mahoganies in Florida. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 6, 201–203.Google Scholar
Hunter, M.D., Watt, A.D. & Docherty, M. (1991) Outbreaks of the winter moth on Sitka spruce in Scotland are not influenced by nutrient deficiencies of trees, tree budburst or pupal predation. Oecologia 86, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, T., Taketani, A. & Yokota, A. (1992) Infestation of meliaceous trees by the mahogany shoot borer in plantation areas of the Peruvian Amazon. Proceedings of the BIOREFOR conference,Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, 1992.Google Scholar
Longman, K.A. & Jeník, J. (1987) Tropical forest and its environment. 2nd edn.London, Longman.Google Scholar
Martorell, L.F. (1943) Forests and forest entomology. Caribbean Forester 4, 132–134.Google Scholar
Moore, P.D. & Chapman, S.B. (1986) Methods in plant ecology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Newton, A.C., Baker, P., Ramnarine, S., Mesén, J.F. & Leakey, R.R.B. (1993) The mahogany shoot borer: prospects for control. Forest Ecology and Management 57, 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyra, M. & Martinez, H. (1985) Comportaniento de Cedrela odorata bajo tres percentajes de mezxela con Cordia alliodora y Tabebuia rosea en Tumaco. CONIF Serie Tecnica No. 11, Bogota, Colombia. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Sánchez J. (1964) Investigacion preliminar sobre biologia ecologia y control de Hypsipyla grandella Zeller. Boletin del Instituto Forestal Latino Americano de Investigacion y Capacitaction 16, 54–77.Google Scholar
Ramnarine, S. (1992) Effect of slow-release carbofuran on the meliaceous shoot borer in Trinidad. Proceedings of the 3rd Agricultural Research Seminar, November 1989. National Institute of Higher Education (Research, Science and Technology) (NIHERST),Port of Spain,Trinidad. pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
Roovers, M. (1971) Observaciones sobre el ciclo de vida de Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) en Barinitas, Venezuela. Boletín del Instituto Forestal de Latino-Americano de Investigación y Capacitación 38, 1–46.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J.C., Holsten, E.H. & Whitmore, J.L. (1976) Compartamiento de 5 especies de Meliaceae en Florencia Sur, Turrialba. pp. 97–103in Whitmore, J.L. (Ed.) Studies on the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae. Vol. III. IICA Miscellaneous Publications No. 101, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
SAS, (1980) SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 5th edn.SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA, pp. 113–137.Google Scholar
Vega, L. (1976) Influencia de la silvicultura en el comportamiento de Cedrela in Surinam. pp. 26–49in Whitmore, J.L. (Ed.) Studies on the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae. Vol. III. IICA Miscellaneous publications No. 101, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Vega, L.E. (1987) Crecimiento del cedro Cedrela odorata manejado en fajas de restrojo y en el asocio inicial con cultivos. CONIF INFORMA No. 10. Bogota, Columbia. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Whitmore, J.L. (Ed.) (1976a) Studies on the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae. Vol. II. IICA Miscellaneous Publications No. 101, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Whitmore, J.L. (Ed.) (1976b) Studies on the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae. Vol. III. IICA Miscellaneous Publications No. 101, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Whitmore, J.L. (1976c) Myths regarding Hypsipyla and its host plants. pp. 54–55in Whitmore, J.L. (Ed.) Studies on the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae. Vol. III. IICA Miscellaneous Publications No. 101, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R.M. (1972) Suppression of the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera, Phyticidae) with controlled release insecticides. PhD thesis, University of Washington, USA. 103 pp.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R.M., Allan, G.G. & Gara, R.I. (1976) Protection of Spanish cedar with controlled release insecticides. pp. 63–70in Whitmore, J.L. (Ed.) Studies on the shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae. Vol. III. IICA Miscellaneous Publications No. 101, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, S., Ikeda, T., Taketani, A., Vasquez Pacheco, C. & Sato, T. (1992) Attack by the mahogany shoot borer, Hypsipyla grandella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), on the meliaceous trees in the Peruvian Amazon. Applied Entomology and Zoology 27, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar