Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-20T11:23:56.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Swedish Wage Earner Funds: A Glimpse of Our Future?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Vaughan Lyon
Affiliation:
Trent University

Abstract

At the end of 1983, after a long and bitter political struggle, the Swedes adopted a system of wage earner funds. The five regionally-based funds are directed by boards dominated by employees. Using funds transferred to them by government, they invest in Swedish companies, primarily by buying shares on the stock market. The fund scheme will enable employees collectively to own about 10 per cent of Swedish business by 1990. They could control far more. Only experience can determine the impact of this new form of social ownership. But possibly the Swedes have found a socially and democratically appealing means of retaining the advantages of a market system while integrating social and economic forces.

Résumé

À la fin de 1983, après une longue et virulente lutte politique, les Suédois mirent sur pied un Fonds de solidarité des travailleurs, constitué de cinq caisses régionales dont les conseils d'administration sont contrôlés par des travailleurs salariés. En se servant des montants que leur transfère l'État, ces caisses investissent dans des entreprises suédoises, principalement en achetant des actions boursiéres. D'ici 1990, ce système devrait permettre à la collectivité des salariés d'être propriétaire d'environ 10 pour cent des actifs industriels et commerciaux suédois … voire bien davantage. Seule l'expérience déterminera la portée de cette nouvelle forme de propriété sociale;il se peut toutefois que les Suédois aient trouvé un moyen séduisant de réunir les avantages d'une économie de marché et ceux d'une intégration de forces sociales et économiques par ailleurs souvent divergents.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 LO, Co-determination in Sweden (Stockholm: Swedish Trade Union Confederation, 1979), 1Google Scholar.

2 Swedish Institute, Labor Relations in Sweden (Stockholm: Swedish Institute, 1984), 2Google Scholar.

3 Ibid., 1.

4 Martin, Andrew, “Trade Unions in Sweden: Strategic Responses to Change and Crisis,” in Peter Gourevitch, et al., Unions and Economic Crisis: Britain, West Germany and Sweden (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984), 254Google Scholar.

5 Forsebäck, Lennart, Industrial Relations and Employment in Sweden (Stockholm: Swedish Institute, 1980), 49Google Scholar.

6 Carnoy, Martin and Shearer, Derek, Economic Democracy: The Challenge of the 1980s (White Plains, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe. 1980), 263Google Scholar.

7 These terms of reference and other details of the plan, as set out below, are taken from Meidner, Rudolf, Employee Investment Funds (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1978)Google Scholar.

8 Waldenström, Erland, “The Investment Fund Debate in the Shadow of the General Election,” Skandinaviska Enskilda Sunken Quarterly Review 2 (1982), 2627Google Scholar.

9 Sweden, Riksdag, Snabbproiocoll från riksdagensdehatterna (December 20, 1983), No. 53 (Stockholm: Riksdagens forvaltningskontor), 89Google Scholar.

10 S1FO, cited in Federation of Swedish Industries, The Debate on Collective Wage Earner Funds in Sweden (Stockholm: Federation of Swedish Industries, 1983), 2Google Scholar.

11 Details of the plan are set out in Sweden, Ministry of Finance, Löntagarfonder äir… (Stockholm: Ministry of Finance, 1984)Google Scholar.

12 Lindblom, Charles E., Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books, 1977)Google Scholar.

13 Canadian Institute of Public Opinion, “The Gallup Poll,” January 29, 1977.

14 Lindblom, , Politics and Markets, 199Google Scholar.