Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T03:36:11.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indigenous Peoples and Neoliberal “Privatization” in Canada: Opportunities, Cautions and Constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

Fiona MacDonald*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
*
Fiona MacDonald, Department of Political Studies, 520 Fletcher Argue, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB, R3T 5V5, macdonaf@cc.umanitoba.ca

Abstract

Abstract. This article addresses the impact of the current neoliberal political context for Indigenous governance in Canada. While some observers have argued correctly that the neoliberal context provides new opportunities or points of entry in the political opportunity structure for “self-government” initiatives (Helvin, 2006; Scott, 2006; Slowey, 2008), I examine to what extent recent decentralizing initiatives, generally viewed as “concessions” made by the state to meet the demands of Indigenous peoples, must be evaluated as part of a broader governmental strategy of neoliberalism. This strategy is not simply about meeting the demands of Indigenous peoples but also about meeting the requirements of the contemporary governmental shift towards “privatization” within liberal democratic states. As such, I argue that certain manifestations of Indigenous self-government are vulnerable to criticisms launched against practices of privatization, practices which include a variety of policies designed to promote a shifting of contentious issues out of the public sphere and thereby limiting public debate and collective—that is, state—responsibility.

Résumé. Le présent article analyse d'un oeil critique l'impact du contexte politique néolibéral actuel sur la gouvernance autochtone au Canada. Certains auteurs ont avancé avec raison que le contexte néolibéral donnait aux peuples autochtones de nouveaux points d'entrée pour leurs initiatives d'autogouvernance (Helvin, 2006; Scott, 2006; Slowey, 2008). Toutefois, j'examine ici dans quelle mesure les tentatives récentes de décentralisation, souvent comprises comme des «concessions» faites par l'État pour répondre aux revendications des peuples autochtones, doivent être évaluées dans le cadre plus vaste d'une stratégie de néolibéralisme du gouvernement. Cette stratégie ne vise pas uniquement à répondre aux besoins des peuples autochtones, mais aussi à permettre au gouvernement de s'orienter vers la «privatisation» qui distingue l'État libéral démocratique contemporain. À ce titre, je soutiens que certaines manifestations d'autogouvernance des Autochtones peuvent se prêter aux mêmes critiques que les pratiques de privatisation, qui comprennent diverses politiques visant à retirer de la place publique certains sujets controversés afin de limiter le débat public et la responsabilité collective, c'est-à-dire celle de l'État.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfred, Taiaiake and Corntassel, Jeff. 2005. “Being Indigenous: Resurgences against Contemporary Colonialism.” Government and Opposition 40: 597614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altamirano-Jiménez, Isabel. 2004North American First Peoples: Slipping up into Market Citizenship?Citizenship Studies 8(4): 349365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara and MacDonald, Fiona. 2010. “Multiculturalism and the Social Sphere.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Multiculturalism, ed. Ivison, Duncan. Famum, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Assembly of First Nations. 2007. “Canadian Human Rights Complaint on First Nations Child Welfare filed today by Assembly of First Nations and First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada”. February 27 2007. At http://www.afn.ca/article.asp?id=3374.Google Scholar
Brodie, Janine. 1995. Politics on the Margins: Restructuring and the Canadian Women's Movement. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
CBC News, July 2 2004. “In Depth: Aboriginal Canadians: BC Treaty Referendum.” At: www.cbc.ca/new/background/aboriginals/bc_treaty_referedum.htmlGoogle Scholar
CBC News, November 21 2006. “In Depth: Aboriginal Canadians: Undoing the Kelowna Accord.” At: www.cbc.ca/new/background/aboriginals/undoing-kelowna.htmlGoogle Scholar
CBC News January 8 2010. “Boy who Died in Fire Might Have Started It” At: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2010/01/08/mb-shamattawa-fire-investigation-manitoba.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cossman, Brenda, and Fudge, Judy. 2002. “Introduction: Privatization, Law, and the Challenge to Feminism.” In Privatization, Law and the Challenge to Feminism, ed. Cossman, Brenda and Fudge, Judy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Glen. 2007. “Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the Politics of Recognition in Colonial Contexts”. Contemporary Political Theory 6(4): 437460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1998. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Malden MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Globerman, S. 2001. “Investment and Capital Productivity.” In Prospering Together: The Economic Impact of the Aboriginal Titles Settlement in B.C., ed. Kunnin, R.. Vancouver, BC: The Laurier Institute.Google Scholar
Green, Joyce. 2001. “Canaries in the Mines of Citizenship.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34: 715–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Charles. 2002. “Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala.” Journal of Latin American Studies 34: 485542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helvin, Calvin. 2006. Dances with Dependency: Indigenous Success through Self Reliance. Vancouver, BC: Orca Spirit Publishing.Google Scholar
Hudson, Pete and McKenzie, Brad 2003. “Extending Aboriginal Control over Child Welfare Services: The Manitoba Child Welfare Initiative.” Canadian Review of Social Policy 51(4): 4966.Google Scholar
Kline, Marlee. 1997. “Blue Meanies in Alberta: Tory Tactics and the Privatization of Child Welfare.” In Challenging the Public/Private Divide: Feminism, Law, and Public Policy, ed. Boyd, Susan B.. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Fiona. 2009. “The Manitoba Government's Shift to “Autonomous” First Nations Child Welfare: Empowerment or Privatization?” In First Nations First Thoughts, ed. Timpson, Annis May. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Fiona. 2010. “Relational Group Autonomy: Ethics of Care and the Multiculturalism ParadigmHypatia 25(1): 196212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manitoba. 1991. The Aboriginal Justice Inquiry Report. Winnipeg: Government of Manitoba. http://www.ajic.mb.ca/volumel/toc.html.Google Scholar
Manitoba. 2001. Promise of Hope: Commitment to Change. Winnipeg: Government of Manitoba. http://www.aji-cwi.mb.ca/eng/Phase3/promiseofhope.html.Google Scholar
Monture-Angus, Patricia. 1998. Journeying Forward: Dreaming First Nations Independence. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michael. 2001. “Culture and the Courts: A New Direction in Canadian Jurisprudence on Aboriginal Rights?Canadian Journal of Political Science 34: 102–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C.724. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Jacquelyn Thayer. 2006. “‘Doing Business with the Devil’: Land, Sovereignty, and Corporate Partnerships in Membertou Inc.” In Self-Determination: The Other Path for Native Americans, ed. Anderson, Terry L., Benson, Bruce L. and Flanagan, Thomas E.242272. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2001. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women's Rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slowey, Gabrielle. 2008. Navigating Neoliberalism: Self-Determination and the Mikisew Cree First Nation. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2007. “The Native and the Neoliberal Down Under: Neoliberalism and ‘Endangered Authenticities’.” In Indigenous Experience Today, ed. de la Cadena, M. and Starn, O.. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2004. Aboriginal Peoples Survey 2001. At http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/89-589-XIE/context.htm.Google Scholar
Stewart-Harawira, Makere. 2005. The New Imperial Order: Indigenous Responses to Globalization. London, UK: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 2000. “The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom.” In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ed. Ivison, Duncan, Patton, Paul and Sanders, Will. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
von Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
White, Lavina, and Jacobs, Eva. 1992. Liberating Our Children: Liberating Our Nations. Victoria BC: Ministry of Social ServicesGoogle Scholar
Williams, Melissa. 2004. “Sharing the River: Aboriginal Representation in Canadian Political Institutions.” In Representation and Democratic Theory, ed. Laycock, David, 93117. Vancouver BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Winnipeg Free Press, 2010A, “‘We let this boy Down:’ councilor” January 9, 2010 At: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/we-let-this-boy-down-councillor-81060352.htmlGoogle Scholar
Winnipeg Free Press, 2010B. “Feds Seek to Scuttle Rights Probe on Native Kids” January 23 2010, At: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/feds-seek-to-scuttle-rights-probe-on-native-kids-82486937.html?viewAllComments=yGoogle Scholar
York, Geoffrey. 1989. The Dispossessed: Life and Death in Native Canada. Toronto: Lester and Orpen Dennys.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar