Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:31:55.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gift Economy and State Power in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Mayfair Mei-Hui Yang
Mayfair Mei-Hui Yang
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The state apparatus in China today has taken upon itself almost total responsibility for administering the social and economic domain. The welfare and control of the population, the organization of production, planning all social activities, and the distribution of the means of subsistence have become primary concerns of organs of the state. The types of power relationships and their social and symbolic expressions, which have crystallized around the distribution and circulation of desirables in such a political economy, are the subject of the present study. The study will also examine how certain counter-techniques of power deviate from the larger strategy of power exercised through the state socialist political economy, forming pockets of intransigence from within.

Type
The Unexpected Origins of Social Policy
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 25 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anagnost, Ann S. 1986. “The Mimesis of Power.”Paper presented at the November 22, 1986 conference, “Anthropological Perspectives on Mainland China, Past and Present,”Center for Chinese Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Berliner, Joseph S. 1957. Factory and Manager in the USSR. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billeter, Jean-Françoís. 1985. “The System of ‘Class Status,’” in The Scope of State Power in China, Schram, Stuart R., ed. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, 127–169.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Nice, Richard, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, Fox. 1982. China: Alive in the Bitter Sea. New York: New York Times Books.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita, AND Unger, Jonathan. 1982. “Grey and Black: The Hidden Economy of Rural China.” Pacific Affairs, 55:3 (Fall), 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiao, Chien. 1982. “Guanxi Chuyi” [“My humble views on guanxi”],Google Scholar
in Shehui jí Xingwei Kexue Yanjiu de Zhongguohua [Sínicization of social and behavioral science research], Guoshu, Yang and Congyi, Wen, eds. Taibeí: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life,Rendall, Steven F., trans. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1986. Heterologies: Discourse on the Other, Massumi, Brian, trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L., AND Rabinow, Paul. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond Struc turalism and Hermeneutics, 2d ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970. Homo Hierarchicus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fei, Xiaotong. 1949. Xiangtu Zhongguo [Folk China]. Beijing University Sociology Department Study Group, 1983, mimeograph. (1949 publication in China by Guan Cha She.)Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979a. “Governmentality.” Ideology and Consciousness, no. 6 (Autumn), 5–21.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979b. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Sheridan, Alan, trans. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. The History of Sexuality, Hurley, Robert, trans. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1983. “The Subject and Power,” in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2d ed., Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 208–226.Google Scholar
Fried, Morton. 1953. The Fabric of Chinese Society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Frolic, B. Michael. 1980. Mao's People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galasi, Peter. 1985. “Peculiarities and Limits of the Second Economy in Socialism (The Hungarian Case),” in The Economics of the Shadow Economy, Gaertner, W. and Wenig, A., eds. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Gates, Hill. 1986. “The Petty Capitalist Mode of Production.” Paper presented at the November 22, 1986 conference, “Anthropological Perspectives on Mainland China, Past and Present,”Center for Chinese Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1965. Politics, Law, and Ritual in Tribal Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gregory, C. A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gregory, 1977. “The ‘Second Economy’ of the USSR.” Problems of Communism, (09-10)26:5, 25–40.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gregory. 1982. “The ‘Shadow Economy’ in the Socialist Sector of the USSR,” in The CMEA Five-Year Plans (1981–1985) in a New Perspective. NATO, Economics and Information Directorates.Google Scholar
Henderson, Gail, AND Cohen, Myron. 1984. The Chinese Hospital: A Socialist Work Unit. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Hsien-chin. 1944. “The Chinese Concept of Face.'” American Anthropologist, 46:1 (01-03), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Bruce, 1979. “A Preliminary Model of Particularistic Ties in Chinese Political Alliances: Kan-Ch'ing and Kuan-hsí in a Rural Taiwanese Township.” China Quarterly, no. 78 (06), 237–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenedi, J. 1981. Dolt Yourself. Hungary's Hidden Economy. New York: Pluto Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship, Bell, J. H. and Sturner, J. R. von, trans. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Zheng, AND Song, Dian, et al. 1981. China's Population: Problems and Prospects. Beijing: New World Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Yinchu. 1979. Xin renkoulun [New essay on the principle of population]. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1961. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: E. P. Dutton and Company.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1906. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Moore, S. and Avel-ing, E., trans. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1967. The Gift, Cunníson, Ian, trans. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1985. “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; the Notion of Self,” in The Category of the Person, Carrithers, M., Collins, S. and Lukes, S., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–25.Google Scholar
O'Hearn, Dennis. 1980. “The Consumer Second Economy: Size and Effects.” Soviet Studies, 32:2 (04), 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan, Parry. 1986. “The Gift, The Indian Gift and the ‘Indian Gift.’” Man, 21:3 (09.), 453–73.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process,” in Trade and Market in Early Empires, Polanyi, Karl and Arensberg, Conrad, eds. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 243–270.Google Scholar
Potter, Sulamith. 1983. “The Position of Peasants in Modern China's Social Order.” Modern China, 9:4, 465–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1972. Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Sampson, Steven. 1983. “Rich Families and Poor Collectives: An Anthropological Approach to Romania's ‘Second Economy.’” Bidrag dl Oststatsforskning [Contributions to East European research] (Uppsala), 11:1, 44–77.Google Scholar
Sampson, Steven. 1985. “The Informal Sector in Eastern Europe.” Telos, no. 66 (Winter), 44–66.Google Scholar
Solinger, Dorothy. 1983. “Marxism and the Market in Socialist China: The Reforms of 1979–1980 in Context,” in State and Society in Contemporary China, Nee, Victor and Mozingo, David, eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 194–219.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1983. “Subject or Object? Women and the Circulation of Valuables in Highland New Guinea,” in Women and Property, Women as Property, Hirschon, R., ed. London: Croon Helm, 158–175.Google Scholar
Sun, Longji. 1983. Zhongguo Wenhua de “Shenceng Jieguo” [“Deep structure” of Chinese culture]. Hong Kong: Taishan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Szelenyi, Ivan. 1982. “The Intelligentsia in the Class Structure of State-Socialist Societies,” in Marxist Inquiries, Burawoy, M. and Skocpol, T., eds. (supplement to American Journal of Sociology, 88). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 5287–5326.Google Scholar
Szelenyi, Ivan. 1983. Urban Inequalities under State Socialism. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tien, H. Yuan. 1973. China's Population Struggle. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Walder, Andrew G. 1986. Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whyte, Martin K., AND Parish, William L. 1984. Urban Life in Contemporary China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Xue, Mugiao. 1981. China's Socialist Economy. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. 1986. “The Art of Social Relationships and Exchange in China.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. 1988. “The Modernity of Power in the Chinese Socialist Order.” Cultural Anthropology, 3:4(11), 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. 1989. “Between State and Society: The Construction of Corporateness in a Chinese S??ialist Factory.” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs. Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar