Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T03:23:13.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V. ‘Capitalist Influence’ and the Transvaal Government during the Crown Colony Period, 1900–1906.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

D. J. N. Denoon
D. J. N. Denoon
Affiliation:
Makerere University College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has become a tradition to portray Transvaal history as a struggle between Boer nationalism and international capitalism, from the beginnings of large-scale gold mining in the 1880s until the electoral victory of General Botha and Het Volk in 1907. J. A. Hobson, writing in 1899–1900, predicted that after—as before—the South African War, the Imperial Government would have to face the dilemma of choosing between ‘an oligarchy of financial Jews, and the restoration of Boer domination’, since there was no other basis of political power. In his analysis of Transvaal white politics, he admitted that some gold-mining companies (the J. B. Robinson group, Barnato's and sometimes the companies of Albu and Goertz) were hostile to the influence of larger companies (Eckstein's and Consolidated Gold Fields), but denied that this affected the monolithic nature of international capitalism in the Transvaal. Later writers on the period, who have rejected almost everything that Hobson wrote, have nevertheless endorsed his interpretation. The Boer leaders were understandably happy to approve of such an analysis, since it placed them in a flattering light as the only realistic salvation for a magnate-dominated society. General Botha, for example, ardently courted the white working men on the Rand after the War, stressing the identity of material interests between farmers and artisans, in the face of the capitalist threat. General Smuts presented a more subtle and persuasive version of the argument, when attempting to persuade the Colonial Office to grant responsible government to the Transvaal and Orange River Colony.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 301 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Hobson, J. A., The War in South Africa (1900), p. 310.Google Scholar

3 E.g. Transvaal Advertiser, 12 June 1905; report of Botha's speech at annual meeting of Amalgamated Society of Engineers. De Volksstem, the general's mouthpiece, consistently preached the same doctrine.

4 See Dr Hyam's, R. article on ‘Smuts and the Magnanimous Gesture’ in the Historical Journal, VIII, 3 (1965), 380–98.Google Scholar

5 C.O. 879/92. Africa South 817. Churchill's Memorandum 30 January 1906.

6 G. H. L. Le May, British Supremacy in South Africa, chapter 7.

7 Garson, N. G., ‘Het Volk’ Historical Journal, IX, no. 1 (1966), 101–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Hyam, R., op. cit.Google Scholar

9 Mansergh, P. N. S., South Africa 1906–1960, The Price of Magnanimity.Google Scholar

10 Economic History Review, XVIII, no. 2 (08 1965). (G. Blainey's article.)Google Scholar

11 Birmingham University Library, Joseph Chamberlain Papers, J.C. 13/1. Milner to Chamberlain, 23 October 1900.

12 Colonial Office archives, CO. 417/294.34191, Milner to Chamberlain 3 October 1900, enclosing resolutions. Cf. also CO. 417/339.4425, petition from Cape Town Refugees Committee, 15 January 1901, and Milner's observations.

18 CO. 417/292.24305, Milner to Chamberlain, 11 July 1900.

14 Transvaal Archives, Colonial Secretary, 2.255/01, notes by Milner, November 1901.

15 CO. 291/30.45779. Milner to Chamberlain, 6 December 1901; and notes by Lambert and Just.

16 CO. 417/290.18336, Milner to Chamberlain, 23 May 1900.

17 CO. 417/326.42283, Milner to Chamberlain, 8 November 1901. The Colonial Office accepted Milner's optimistic predictions, and even produced a more optimistic set of statistics for the future white population. In the event, both sets proved over-optimistic.

18 Webb, B., Our Partnership, p. 352.Google Scholar

19 C.O. 1903 (xiv) 1586. Statement of application of development loan. £6,000,000 simply replaced an existing debt owed to the Imperial Government; £4,000,000 was required in order to compensate loyalists for war damage; £2,500,000 converted the public debt inherited from the Republican Transvaal Government, £13,000,000 was earmarked for expropriating railway lines in the two new colonies; and £9,500,000 remained for development of the economies of the two new colonies, Transvaal and Orange River Colony.

20 CO. 417/377.30569, Milner to Chamberlain, 27 July 1903.

21 CO. 417/292.24305, copy of Milner to Roberts, 5 May 1900.

22 C.T. 287, J.L. 589. Fitzpatrick to Duncan, 26 December 1902, and reply 7 January 1903.

23 Duncan Papers, Transvaal Finance 1901–4 group, Duncan to Milner 14 July 1902.

24 Milner Papers, xxxn, 21–2. Milner to Duncan, 29 December 1902.

25 Rhodes House Library, Lagden Papers, MSS. Afr. s. 175. Lagden's Diary.

26 S.A. Native Affairs Commission, Vol. IV. Q. 39, 950. Secretary for Native Affairs giving evidence.

27 Lieutenant Governor, 171 K. Selborne to Lt.-G. Solomon, 20 November 1905.

28 CO. 291/51.32400. Chamberlain to Milner, 5 August 1902.

29 Legislative Council debates, 5th session, 11 July 1905, col. 39.

30 Lieutenant-Governor, 10b. 105/14, Curtis to Lawley's Private Secretary, 2 September 1903.

31 Chamber of Mines Letterbook Private; Cowie to Farrar, 8 October 1903.

32 Candidates listed and labelled in Rand Daily Mail, 29 October 1903; successful candidates listed and discussed in Transvaal Leader 11 December 1903.

38 Chamber of Mines archives, M.7a, Davidson to Chamber, 8 February 1902.

34 Transvaal Law Reports, 1904. Witwatersrand High Court, 6–17 May 1904. Germiston Ratepayers' Association v. Germiston Municipality before Wessels J.

35 S.A. Public Library, Rose Innes Papers, 380. Solomon to Innes, 30 December 1901.

36 Governor P.S. 92, LIX (1902): Solomon to Milner, 12 January 1902.

37 CO. 291/40.33020. Report of Gold Law Commission; and Chamberlain to Milner, 15 September 1902.

38 C.S. 1078.053. Interview between Fitzpatrick and Milner, Lawley to Milner, 20 September 1903.

39 Milner Papers, XLVI, part 2, p. 5.Google Scholar

40 Lieutenant-Governor, 193.2177. Messrs Solomon & Thompson to Wybergh; Wybergh's reply 22 April 1903; Solomon's reply 9 April 1903; letters from many other law firms 10 March 1903.

41 Milner Papers, XLVII, 5–6. Fiddes to Milner, 29 June 1900.Google Scholar

42 CO. 291/64.3112. Onslow to Chamberlain, 4 February 1903; transmitting Chancellor's views; and Long, B. K., Drummond Chaplin, p. 66.Google Scholar

43 Bodleian Library, Monk Bretton Papers, fo. 94; Chamberlain's dining lists during his South African tour.

44 Milner Papers, xxxix, 28.Google Scholar Mrs Chaplin to Milner, 9 February 1903; and Long, B. K., op. cit. passim.Google Scholar

45 CO. 291/51.38975, Perry to Just, 1 August 1902.

46 Chamber of Mines archives, Ch. Private. Meeting held 20 September 1903.

47 Ibid. Ch. 14. Meeting held on io, 16 and 22 October 1903.

48 Milner Papers, XLI, part 4, p. 24.Google Scholar, Milner to Chamberlain, , 13 July 1903.Google Scholar

49 E.C. 67.202/03. Notes by executive councillors, April and May 1903.

50 Legislative Council debates, second session, 1903–4.

51 Chamber of Mines archives, Letterbook private. Chamber to I.S.A.A. 11 December 1905.

52 Burt, T., Visit to the Transvaal, p. 64Google Scholar and passim; cf. also MacDonald, R., What I saw in South Africa, pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

53 Governor P.S. 37, CXCIII. W. L. Bagot to Glyn, 8 April 1905.

64 Chamber of Mines archives, Ch. 58. Bagot to Robinson, 12 November 1904.

55 Ibid. Letterbook private, December 1905—January 1906.

56 Monk Bretton Papers, 84; D. O. Malcolm to Monk Bretton, 14 September 1906.

57 Within the Progressive party, for example, Farrar and Fitzpatrick managed to conceal their personality and policy differences: and within the Responsible Government Association (rechristened the National party) Richard Solomon and Harry Solomon also contrived to co-operate.

58 Rand Daily Mail, 25 January 1904Google Scholar and 7 July 1905; and Webber, H. O'K., The Grip of Gold, chapter xiv.Google Scholar

59 C.O. 291/53.47226, copy of H. H. Webb to Rudd, i October 1902.

60 Transvaal Indigency Commission, evidence of P. R. Frames, pp. 289 ff., esp. Q. 6944. Frames was a Director of Premier.

61 Governor P.S. 76, CLXI (1904). Transvaal Diamond Mining Association to Milner, 7 July 1903; and Lieutenant-Governor 19b.2177, correspondence re Ordinance 66 of 1903 which was concerned with the tax on precious stones.

62 Details expounded in Fitzpatrick, , South African Memories, pp. 100 ff.Google Scholar

63 Star, July 1903 passim, esp. 10 July 1903. See also Rand Daily Mail, 10 June 1905.

64 Blainey, G., op. cit.Google Scholar

65 Chamber of Mines archives, G3b; Hanau to Executive Committee, 18 July 1902; Fitzpatrick to R. Solomon, July 1902; Solomon to Fitzpatrick, 23 July 1902.

66 Ibid. Ch. Private. Meeting held on 22 September 1903.

67 CO. 291/112, 14018. Transvaal Mines Labour Company to Elgin, 2 April 1906. See also: Weinthal, Leo, Life of J. B. Robinson, pp. 170 et. seq.Google Scholar

68 Henderson, I., White Populism in Southern Rhodesia; paper delivered at the 1968 Social Science Conference at Dar-es-Salaam.Google Scholar

69 Press ownership and attitudes are more fully discussed and documented in my thesis, Reconstruction in the Transvaal, 1900–1905 (Cambridge, 1965).Google Scholar

70 Milner Papers, XLII, part 2, p. 50; Milner to Lyttelton, 2 April 1905.Google Scholar

71 Transvaal Leader, 18 June 1904; letter from E. P. Solomon.

71 Governor P.S. 91, CLXIV (1904).

73 May, Le, op. cit. p. 172Google Scholar; Webber, H. O'K., op. cit.Google Scholar; Brothers, O. F., The First Transvaal Parliament.Google Scholar

74 Garson, N. G.op. cit.Google Scholar; van Aardt, J. N. H., Die Botha Bewind in die Transvaal pp. 36 ff.Google Scholar

75 Pretoria Kongres, report published by De Volksstem (1904).

76 Lieutenant-Governor 74.84/31. Botha to Lawley, 11 July 1904.

77 Rhodes House Library, Sir Frederick Hamilton Papers, MSS. Afr. s. 139. Unsigned memorandum quoting Pakenham to Hamilton.

78 Milner Papers, LXII, 55 ff.; Milner to Lyttelton, 4 July 1904.Google Scholar

79 Star February to May 1904 and March to May 1905 passim; and Rand Daily Mail March and April 1905, passim.

80 Transvaal Archives, Creswell Papers, Chinese labour group; Creswell to his sister, 19 September 1905 and 7 October 1905; Smuts group, copy of Robinson to Merriman, 16 May 1906.

81 Krugersdorp Standard, passim.

82 Weinthal, Leo, op. cit.Google Scholar

83 Brothers, O. F., op. cit.Google Scholar

84 Cf. May, Le, op. cit.Google Scholar

85 Brothers, O. F., op. cit.Google Scholar

86 Creswell Papers, Smuts group; Smuts to Creswell, 26 June 1906.

87 Ibid. Merriman group passim; and Chinese Labour group passim.

88 Brothers, O. F., op. cit. Reid, who had already enjoyed a paid trip to Europe, was the Labour candidate involved in this affair.Google Scholar

88 The phrase is from Bonn, Moritz: Wandering Scholar (London 1949).Google Scholar

90 Brothers, O. F., op. cit.Google Scholar; Hobson, J. A., The War in South Africa throws considerable light on the mechanism whereby magnates could influence local politics.Google Scholar

91 Milner, A., England in Egypt (1892). And everything he wrote before 1914.Google Scholar

92 National Review (04, 1906); articles by Milner and Lyttelton.Google Scholar

93 Duncan Papers; Selborne to Duncan, 8 July 1907.

94 M CO. 417/427.9449 Selborne to Elgin, 26 February 1906. Comments by F. Graham.

95 CO. 879/92; Africa South 817. Memorandum by Churchill, 30 January 1906: see also Africa South 823; and Edinburgh Review (April 1904), for similar opinions.

96 Contemporary Review (04, 1906): ‘The Transvaal and the New Government’ by Wybergh.Google Scholar