Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T05:34:52.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethnic Ineqality in Iran: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Akbar Aghajanian
Affiliation:
Department of SociologyShiraz University

Extract

In this paper we discussed socioeconomic inequality among ethnic communities in Iran. There were significant clues to the widening gap between Persian and non-Persian communities. That is, contrary to the existing theories, modernization and industrialization have not been accompanied with improvement in the distribution of the resources among ethnic communities; rather they have increased inequality. Thus, we looked into the particular nature of Iranian modernization for causes of interethnic inequality. Political centralization, domination of Persian language and culture, and centralization of early industrialization contributed much to the development of the interethnic inequality at early stage of the Iranian modernization. In the new area, the 1960s–1970s, the existing gap was further widened by centralized and urban-biased economic growth. This was possible only because of the government's unique access to the increasing oil revenues which were generated with very little help from the domestic means of production.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 See Cahen, Claude, “Tribes, Cities, and Social Organization,” in Frye, R. N. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 4: The Period from the Arab Invasion to the Saljuqs (Cambridge, 1975);Google Scholarde Schooten, Marie-Therese Ullens, Lords of the Mountains (London: Chatto and Windows, 1956);Google ScholarSmith, Harry H. et al. , Area Handbook for Iran (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1971);Google ScholarLimbert, John, “The Organization and Appearance for Kurds in Pre-Islamic Iran,” Iranian Studies 3, pp. 4145;Google ScholarIrons, William, “Turkoman of Iran: A Brief Research Report,” Iranian Studies 2, pp. 2738;CrossRefGoogle ScholarYasemi, Rashid, Kurd-va-Peyvastegihay Nezhadiva-Tarikhi (Tehran: Abnesina, K.J.);Google ScholarField, Henry, Contributions to the Anthropology of Iran, (Chicago: Chicago Natural History Museum, 1939).Google Scholar

2 See Diakonof, M., Tarikhi Medes, (Tehran: Entesharat Nash-va-Tarjomeh Ketab, 1349).Google Scholar

3 See Cottam, Richard W., Nationalism in Iran, (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1964), pp. 2332.Google Scholar

4 During the period 1971–76, 601, 195 persons aged five years and above moved out of East-Azarbayjan to Tehran. For West Azarbayjan, Kermanshahan, Baluchestan and Kurdestan the figures are: 113,647; 14,795; 3,196; and 66,602 respectively. See Plan Organization, Statistical Center: Census of Population of Housing, Tehran Sharestan (Tehran: Plan Organization, 1979).Google Scholar

5 Population figures according to the 1976 Census: Baluchistan 659,297; Kurdestan 781,889; Kermanshahan 1,016,199; East Azarbayjan 3,194, 543; West Azarbayjan 1,404,875. See Plan Organization, Statistical Centre Census of Population and Housing, Volumes 166, 167, 168, 174, 175, Table 5.Google Scholar

6 Several writers argue that Azari does not have a Turkish origin and is another dialect of the Persian Language. See Kasravi, Ahmad, Azari (Tehran: Entesharat Mat-buiati Shargh, no date);Google ScholarMortazivi, Manuwcher, Zaban Dyrin Azarbayjan, (Tehran: Moghufat Afshar, 1360).Google Scholar

7 Cottam, Nationalism in Iran, pp. 164–167.Google Scholar

8 See Avery, Peter, Modern Iran (London: Ernest Benn Limited, 1965), pp. 7495.Google Scholar

9 Almost a total paralysis characterized the Iranian government by 1921 and most Iranians knew that their country needed a strong government. Hence there was no surprise when a coup d'etat brought into power a strong-minded leader, Sayyed Zia al-Din Tabatabai. In order to carry out this coup d'etat, he had allied with an ambitious colonel of the Persian Gossacks, Reza Khan, who received as his reward the position of Commander in Chief of the Gossacks. Because of his conflict with the land-owning class and being unable to attract nationalist support, Sayyed Zia found himself totally dependent on Reza Khan's Gossacks. Reza Khan soon forced Sayyad Zia into exile and began to climb to absolute power. See Cottam, Nationalism in Iran, p. 19.;Google ScholarAvery, Modern Iran, p. 215.Google Scholar

10 Park, Robert, Race and Culture, (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1950).Google Scholar

11 Frazier, Franklin E., Race and Culture Contacts in the Modern World, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).Google Scholar

12 Barth, Ernest A. and Noel, Donald L., “Conceptual Framework for Analysis of Race Relations: An Evaluation,” Social Forces 50 (1971) pp. 333348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 A refinery was commissioned on the hand of Abadan around 1913 and this was a huge capital investment in Khuzistan. This was a starting point for absorbing non-Arabs and especially Persians of the Central plateau. During the war and later, when the 1901 concession was renewed, activities related to the oil industry expanded vastly and in-migration to Khuzistan accelerated. This continued in the 1960s. See Elwell-Sulton, L. P., Persian Oil: A Study in Power Politics, (London: Lawrence and Wishart Ltd., 1965).Google Scholar

14 Out of all the Khuzistan population, about 14 percent were born out of the province and about 60 thousands have arrived in Khuzistan during the period 1971–1976. See Plan Organization, Statistical Office, Census of Population and Housing, Khuzistan Province (Tehran: Plan Organization, 1979), p. 13.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., footnote 10.

16 Bank Markazi Iran, Annual Report and Balance Sheet, 1976 (Tehran: Bank Markazi Printing Office, 1977).Google Scholar

17 Plan Organization, Statistical Center: Sal-name Amari Iran, 1355, (Tehran: Plan Organization, 1357).Google Scholar

18 Blumer, Herbert, “Industrialization and Race Relations,” in Hunter, Guy (ed.): Industrialization and Race Relations (London: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

19 See Mosahab, Gholam-Hosyn, Derat-ol-Ma'aref Farsi: Jeld Avval (Tehran: Entesharat Jibi, 1345) for detail of changes in the administrative division of Iran since 1906.Google Scholar

20 See Keshavarz, Khosrow, Tarikh-i-Iran: Az Bastan-ta-Emrouz (Tehran: Entesharat Tous, 1359).Google Scholar

21 Bharier, J., Economic Development in Iran 1900–70 (London: Oxford University Press, 1971);Google ScholarVaghefi, Mohammad Reza and Vaghefi, Simin Dokht, Modernization of Iran, (Tehran: State Management Training Center, 1976).Google Scholar

22 An enclave industry or sector does not have backward or forward linkage with other parts of the economy.Google Scholar

23 See Poulos, Pan A. Yot and Nugent, Jeffrey B., Economics of Development: Empirical Investigations (New York: Harper and Row, 1976);Google ScholarMeier, Geral M., Leading Issues in Economic Development, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

24 Baldwin, George B., Planning and Development in Iran, (Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1967);Google ScholarKatouzian, M. A., “Oil Versus Agriculture: A Case of Dual Resource Depletion in Iran,” The Journal of Peasant Studies 5, pp. 347369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Holiday, Fred, Iran: Dictatorship and Development, Persian translation by Nik-Poor, Fazlolah, (Tehran: Amir Kabir Press, 1979).Google Scholar