Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:41:10.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The commons In the sky: the radio spectrum and geosynchronous orbit as issues in global policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Marvin S. Soroos
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science at North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
Get access

Abstract

Radio waves, which are used to transmit information electronically, are a portion of the larger spectrum of electromagnetic waves. They are used for purposes as diverse as telephone, AM and FM radio, UHF and VHF television, air and marine navigation, radar, radio astronomy, meteorology, data transmission, and electronic mail. Some uses of the spectrum entail transmitting or receiving information via satellites orbiting the planet. In order to communicate without interference at any given time, a user must have exclusive access to a frequency over a geographical area determined by the distance that the signals travel to targeted receivers.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Section of the International Studies Association at Gainesville, Florida, 29–31 October 1981. The author would like to thank Jack D. Salmon, Robert L. Hoffman, Ingvar Botnen, Peter Katzenstein, and John B. O'Neal for their useful comments- and suggestions.

1 Hz is an abbreviation for the number of cycles of a radio wave that pass a fixed point within one second. GHz stands for gigaHertz, which is one million Hz. A band is a section of the frequency spectrum designated by international agreement. See Leinwoll, Stanley, From Spark to Satellite (New York: Scribner's, 1979), pp. 123–24Google Scholar.

2 For a further explanation, see ibid., pp. 124–29.

3 Botnen, Ingvar and Gleditsch, Nils Petter, A Study of Radio Spectrum Usage (Oslo: International Peace Research Institute, 1980), pp. 25Google Scholar.

4 Gorove, Stephen, “The Geostationary Orbit: Issues of Law and Policy”, American Journal of International Law 73, 3 (08 1979), p. 445CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Smith, Delbert D., Space Stations and International Law and Policy (Boulder, Col.: Westview, 1979), p. 6Google Scholar.

6 Gorove, , “Geostationary Orbit”, p. 445Google Scholar.

8 Cohen, Theodore J., “World Administrative Radio Conference of 1979”, Popular Electronics 18, 8 (08 1980), p. 73Google Scholar.

11 Queeny, Kathryn M., Direct Broadcast Satellites and the United Nations (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1978), p. 17Google Scholar.

12 Gorove, , “Geostationary Orbit”, p. 447Google Scholar.

13 The full name is Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, signed 27 January 1967, entered into force 13 October 1967, 18 UST 2410, TIAS no, 6347, 610 U. N. T. S. 205.

14 For a history of the ITU and a description of its structure and operations, see Leive, David M., International Telecommunications and International Law: The Regulations of the Radio Spectrum (Dobbs Ferry, N. Y.: Oceana, 1970)Google Scholar, and Luard, Evan, International Agencies: The Emerging Framework of Interdependence (Dobbs Ferry, N. Y.: Oceana, 1977), pp. 2744CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Jacobson, Harold K., “ITU: A Potpourri of Bureaucrats and Industrialists”, in The Anatomy of Influence: Decision-Making In International Organization, ed. by Cox, Robert W. and Jacobson, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973), p. 74Google Scholar.

16 “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 13 December 1968, pp. 1243–48.

17 White, Curtis T., “Uprooting the Squatters”, Foreign Policy no. 34 (Spring 1979), pp. 148–53Google Scholar.

18 Wallenstein, Gerd D., “Make Room in Space: Harmony and Dissonance in International Telecommunications” (Part 1), Telecommunication Journal 40, 1 (01 1973), p. 31Google Scholar. See also Leive, , International Telecommunications, pp. 1920Google Scholar.

19 This procedure applies to activities generating signals that cross international boundaries. National governments have full jurisdiction over use of the radio spectrum within their boundaries so long as they do not cause harmful interference for foreign users abiding by international rules. Moreover, these national users do not have a legal basis for demanding a cessation of interference from foreign users who are properly registered with the IFRB.

20 Gorove, , “Geostationary Orbit”, p. 449Google Scholar.

21 See above, footnote 15.

22 Gorove, , “Geostationary Orbit”, p. 457Google Scholar.

23 Eglin, Roger, “The Communication Satellite Boom: The International Race to Corner the Space Market”, World Press Review 28, 8 (07 1981), p. 53 (originally published in the Sunday Times [London], 10 May 1981)Google Scholar.

24 Cohen, , “WARC of 1979”, p. 73Google Scholar.

25 Wallenstein, Gerd D., “Make Room in Space: Harmony and Dissonance in International Telecommunications” (Part 2), Telecommunication Journal 40, 2 (02 1973), pp. 101–2Google Scholar.

26 Luard, , International Agencies, p. 36Google Scholar.

27 See the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, G. A. Resolution 3281 (XXIX), 12 December 1974.

28 See International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems, Interim Report on Communication Problems in Modern Society (Paris:. UNESCO, 1978).

29 Hudson, Heather E., “Implications for Development Communications”, Journal of Communication 29, 1 (Winter 1979), p. 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Fore, William F., “Communication as Power: WARC 79”, Christian Century, 2 05 1979, p. 498Google Scholar.

31 “Third World Static”, Newsweek, 8 October 1979, p. 52.

32 For a discussion of the Bogota Declaration, see Gorove, , “Geostationary Orbit”, pp. 450–55. Jack Salmon (personal correspondence) counts 27 countries, all less developed, that are located within five longitudinal degrees of the equator. Six developed countries (Australia, Spain, Portugal, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States) control colonies, islands or other territories within the equatorial zoneGoogle Scholar.

33 Mc Leod, Norman, “The World Takes on the Law of the Air”, New Scientist, 20 09 1979, p. 878Google Scholar.

34 Robinson, Glen O., “The U. S. Position”, Journal ofCommunication 29, 1 (Winter 1979), p. 157Google Scholar.

35 Ronalds, Francis S., “Voices of America”, Foreign Policy no. 34 (Spring 1979), p. 157Google Scholar.

36 Mc Leod, , “World Takes on Law of Air”, p. 878Google Scholar.

37 Ronalds, , “Voices of America”, p. 159Google Scholar.

38 See above, footnote 15.

39 Smith, , Space Stations, p. 92Google Scholar.