Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:27:39.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Colonial Office, British Business Interests and the Reform of Cocoa Marketing in West Africa, 1937–1945*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

David Meredith
David Meredith
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article examines the actions of the British Colonial Office and British business interests in the international marketing of cocoa from Ghana and Nigeria in the later 1930s, when problems in cocoa marketing were brought to head by the expatriate firms forming a ‘Pool’ and the farmers responding to this — and to a sudden fall in their terms of trade — with a ‘hold-up’, which was followed by a British commission of inquiry, and during the second world war and immediate post-war era, when the C.O. imposed a marketing system designed by the expatriate merchant firms and subsequently decided to make it into a permanent peacetime reorganization. The close contact between the CO. and British firms such as the United Africa Company and Cadbury Bros. is brought out, as is the support given by the officials to these companies before and during the war. A further theme is a certain antipathy displayed by the officials for African capitalists in general and cocoa traders in particular and the way in which the war-time scheme squeezed African and other non-British small cocoa-export firms in many cases out of business.

The war-time scheme convinced the C.O. that a peacetime system of fixed buying prices which were set well below the world price was desirable as a means of eradicating ‘middleman abuses’ and of building up large ‘stabilization funds’ to protect the cocoa farmers in future years when prices might fall. Continuation of the scheme was thus seen as an act of trusteeship. It was also attractive to the British Treasury because it maximized U.S. dollar earnings for Britain from the sale of West African cocoa. In contrast to interpretations put forward by some other historians, this article argues that the Colonial Office had close, day-to-day contact with the leading British firms involved, that it strongly supported the ‘Pool’ system before and during the early stages of the war, and that the post-war marketing structure was an outcome of the war-time scheme and not of the Nowell Commission report of 1938. Finally, having lost in an unequal struggle with the expatriate firms and the Colonial Office between 1937 and 1944, African international shippers of cocoa were permanently excluded.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , July 1988 , pp. 285 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bauer, P. T., ‘Origins of statutory export monopolies of British West Africa’, Business Hist. Rev. XXVIII (1954), 205.Google Scholar

2 Meredith, David, ‘State controlled marketing and economic “development”: the case of West African produce during the Second World War’, Econ. Hist. Rev. 2nd ser., xxxix, I (1986), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Westcott, Nicholas, ‘The East African sisal industry, 1929–1949: the marketing of a colonial commodity during depression and war’, J. Afr. Hist. xxv, 4 (1984), 445–61;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPalmer, Robin, ‘The Nyasaland tea industry in the era of international tea restrictions, 1933–1950’,J. Afr. Hist. XXVI, 2–3 (1985), 211–39.Google Scholar

4 Milburn, Josephine, ‘The 1938 Gold Coast cocoa crisis: British business and the Colonial Office’, Afr. Hist. Studies, III, I (1970), 72;Google ScholarIdem, British Business and Ghanian Independence (1977), 26.

5 Hopkins, A. G., ‘Big Business in African Studies’, J. Afr. Hist. XXVIII, 1 (1987), 129–30.Google Scholar

6 League of Nations, Journal of the Economic and Monetary Conference (London, 1933),60;Google ScholarC.O. to Foreign Office, 9 February. 1934, Public Records Office (London), CO. 323/1300/31925/34.Google Scholar

7 Minute by Eastwood, C. C., 24 September 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

8 Minute by Clauson, G. (Assistant Secretary, Colonial Office and Head of the Economic Department,) 27 November 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

9 C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

10 C.O. 85267/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

11 C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

12 On the Gold Coast cocoa hold-up see Miles, John, ‘Rural protest in the Gold Coast:the cocoa hold-ups, 1908–1938’, in Hopkins, A. G. and Dewey, Clive (eds), The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India (London, 1978);Google ScholarGrier, Beverly C., ‘Cocoa marketing in colonial Ghana: capitalist enterprise and the emergence of a rural African bourgeoisie’, paper presented to the African Studies Association Conference, Los Angeles, 1979;Google ScholarGrier, ‘Cocoa, class formation and the state in Ghana’ (Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1979).Google Scholar

13 Minute by Fiddian, A. J. (Principal, Colonial Oflice), 5 Feb. 1931, CO. 96/696/ 6844/31.Google Scholar

14 The terms of trade have been calculated from trade statistics in Gold Coast, Blue Book, Trade Returns, 1928–1938.Google Scholar

15 Evening Standard (London) 24 Oct. 1937;Google ScholarFinancial News (London) 30 Oct. 1937;Google ScholarThe Times (London) 30 Oct. 1937.Google Scholar

16 Lord Trenchard, Chairman of U.A.C., telephoned Sir Cosmo Parkinson (Assistant Under Secretary of State) with news of the hold-up on 15 Nov. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

17 C.O. to Gold Coast, telegram, 15 Nov.. 1937, CO. 852/67/25006/3/37.Google Scholar

18 CO. to Gold Coast, telegram (2),24 Nov. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

19 C.O. to Gold Coast, telegram, 1 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

20 Gold Coast to CO., telegram, 3 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

21 Hodson to Ormsby-Gore, 11 Nov. 1937, CO. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

22 Cadbury and Samuel to Trenchard, 3 Dec. 1937, C.O. 15006/3/37; notes of meeting between Messrs. Mellor and Knight (U.A.C,) and Sir Cecil Bottomley (Assistant Under Secretary of State) at C.O., 4 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

23 Meeting, 4 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

24 Notes of meeting between Cadbury and Trenchard and Ormsby-Gore, 7 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar

25 CO. to Gold Coast, telegram, 24 June. 1938, C.O. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

26 Minute by Clauson, 5 June. 1938, CO.852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

27 Notes of meeting between Samuel and Cadbury and Clauson, 18 Jan. 1938, CO. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

28 Gold Coast to C.O., 28 June. 1938, C.O. 852/133/115006/3/38; Ormsby-Gore informed the Cabinet on 1 Feb.Google Scholar

29 U.A.C. to CO., 6 April. 1938, C.O. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

30 Gold Coast to CO., telegram, 21 Apr. 1938, CO. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

31 Notes of meeting between representatives of U.A.C. and Cadbury Bros., and C.O., 1 Sept. 1938; notes of telephone conversation between Mellor (U.A.C.) and Sir Henry Moore (Assistant Under Secretary of State), 6 Sept., C.O. 852/134/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

32 C.O. to Gold Coast, telegram, 12 Sept. 1938, C.O. 852/134/15006/3/38.Google Scholar

33 Report of the Commission on the Marketing of West African Cocoa, British Parliamentary Papers [hereafter B.P.P.J, 1937–1938, iX, Cmd. 5845, 191.Google Scholar

34 Gold Coast to CO., 1 Jun. 1939, CO. 852/192/15006/IF/39.Google Scholar

35 C.O. to Gold Coast, 31 Aug. 1939, CO. 852/192/15006/IF/39.Google Scholar

36 U.A.C. to C.O., 11 Sept. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/39/1.Google Scholar

37 Minute by Lord Dufferin and Ava (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for the Colonies), 21 Sept. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/39/1;Google Scholarminute by Carstairs, C. Y., 6 May 1943, CO. 852/530/19875/9/1/43.Google Scholar

38 Sir Henry Moore to Lord Dufferin and Ava, 21 Sept. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015 39/1;Google ScholarC.O. to Treasury, 19 Sept. 1940, CO. 852/319/18015/IK/40.Google Scholar

39 C.O. to Gold Coast and Nigeria, 23 Sept. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/39/I,Google Scholar

40 Ibid.

41 First revised draft of control scheme, 18 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/3.Google Scholar

42 Memorandum by the Association of West African Merchants, 3 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/2.Google Scholar

43 Ibid.

44 Coddington and Lamb Ltd. to CO., 29 Dec. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/4.Google Scholar

45 Minutes of third meeting of Gold Coast Cocoa Committee, 23 Dec. 1939, C.O. 852/ 256/16015/39/4.Google ScholarIn the Gold Coast, Sir Nana Ofori Atta demanded 50,000 tons for ‘B’ shippers: Ghana National Archives (hereafter G.N.A.), C.S.O. 506/39/SF3.Google Scholar

46 U.A.C. to CO., 29 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/ 6015/39/3.Google Scholar

47 Gold Coast to C.O., 29 Dec. 1939, C.O. 852/318/18015/1/40.Google Scholar

48 C.O. to Leventis, 16 Oct 1940, C.O. 852/318/18105/1H/40.Google Scholar

49 G.N.A., C.S.O. B.F.0001/114 (1940).Google Scholar

50 Gold Coast to C.O. 16 Jun. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1/40.Google Scholar

51 C.O. to Gold Coast., 20 Mar. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/11/40. See also the case of G. D. Egremont, whom the Gold Coast Government supported, G.N.A., C.S.O. 506/ 39/SF2O/ 1940.Google Scholar

52 Ibid

53 Nigeria to CO., 27 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/3.Google Scholar

54 Minute by Williams, O. G., 5 Mar. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1D/40.Google Scholar

55 Minute by Melville, E., 4 May 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1/40.Google Scholar

56 Minutes of meeting of W.A.C.C.B., 12 Sept. 1940, C.O. 852/319/18015/1M(i)40.Google Scholar

57 C.O. to Gold Coast, 1 Sept. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/IK/40.Google Scholar

58 Ibid.

59 Minute by Melville, 19 Sept. 1940, CO. 852/318/18015/1K/40.Google Scholar

60 Minute by Melville, 12 Jun. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1K/40;Google ScholarGovernor Hodson expressed similar sentiments in March 1940, G.N.A., B.F. 0028/1/40.Google Scholar

61 Melville to Caine, 10 Feb. 1941, C.O. 85/444/18015/IH/41.Google Scholar

62 Minute by Caine, 3 Jun. 1941, CO. 852/444/18015/1H/41.Google Scholar

63 Minute by Caine, 1 Dec. 1941, C.O. 852/444/18015/ID/41.Google Scholar

64 Ibid

65 Tansley to Miles, 4 Jun. 1941, CO. 853/4/18015/1D/41.Google Scholar

66 Minute by Williams, 28 Nov. CO. 852/444/ 18015/1D/41.Google Scholar

67 Minute by Henlen, 1 Dec. C.O. 852/4/18015/1D/41;Google ScholarCocoa Association of London to C.O., 23 Dec. CO. 852/445/18015/1K(3)42.Google Scholar

68 Colonial Secretary, Gold Coast to Melville, 18 Jul. C.O. 852/445/18015/IK/41.Google Scholar

69 Tansley to Henlen, 8 Jun. 1942, C.O. 852/445/18015/1K(3)42.Google Scholar

70 W.A.P.C.B. Paper No. 21, 10 Sept. 1943, CO. 852/512/19601/43.Google Scholar

71 Minutes of meeting between Gerard Creasy, Eric Tansley and representatives of the Gold Coast Government, Accra, 13 Jun. 1944, C.O. 852/595/19601/9/44.Google Scholar

72 CO. to Gold Coast and Nigeria, Aug. 1943, C.O. 852/445/18015/1K/41;Google ScholarC.O.memorandum, Oct. 1943, C.O. 852/525/19760/43.Google Scholar See also: Bauer, P. T.. West African Trade: A Study of Competition, Oligopoly and Monopoly in a Changing Economy (Cambridge, 1954); Bauer, ‘Origins of the statutory export monopolies’; Meredith,‘State controlled marketing’.Google Scholar

73 Accumulated cocoa profits stood at £37 millions at the end of the 1942–1943 season; the U.S.A. took 39 per cent of the cocoa sold by the Board in 1942–1943, but profit per ton on U.S. sales was £12.3.4d compared to £6.5.od per ton on sales to the Ministry of Food (Report on Cocoa Control in West Africa 1939–1943 and Statement of Future Policy(B.P.P.1943–1944, iii, 153, Cmd. 6554); W.A.P.C.B., C.O. 852/525/19760/74/1/43).Google Scholar

74 CO. Memorandum, 10 Oct. 1943, CO. 852/525/19760/43.Google Scholar

75 Cadbury to Creasy, 6 Mar. 1945, C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT2/45.Google Scholar

76 Cadbury to Ministry of Supply, 13 Mar. 1942, C.O. 852/318/18015/G1/42.Google Scholar

77 Minutes of meeting between Secretary of State for the Colonies and the Association of West African Merchants Cocoa Sub-Committee, 15 Nov. 1944, C.O. 852/596/19601/ 9/7/44.Google Scholar

78 Joint Provincial Council to Gold Coast Government, 26 Jun. C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT2/45Google Scholar see also, Echo, Daily, 26 Oct. 1945Google Scholar and Gold Coast Independent, 28 Oct. 1945.Google Scholar

79 Minute by Creasy, 1 Jul. C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT2/45.Google Scholar

80 Minutes of a meeting between Cadbury Bros., Frys, Rowntrees, C.W.S and Lyons and Creasy, 21 Sept. 1944 C.O. 852/595/19601/9/44.Google Scholar

81 Gold Coast to C.O., 9 Oct. C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/44.Google Scholar

82 Nigeria to C.O., 13 May 1944, C.O. 852/595/19601/9/4/44.Google Scholar

83 C.O. to Gold Coast, 10 Dec. 1945, C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT3/45.Google Scholar

84 For example, Clauson met Samuel at the Savoy Hotel on 12 Jun. 1938 (Samuel told him he thought the hold-up would soon end), and in October 1938 the Secretary of State gave a dinner party for ‘leading personalities’ of the U.A.C.Google Scholar (Minute by Clauson, 13 Jun. 1937, C.O. 852/133/15006/3/38; note by Eastwood, 18 Oct. 1938, CO. 852/134/15006/3/38).Google Scholar

85 Some years previously Hodson (as Governor of Sierra Leone) was in trouble at the Colonial Office over the gift of a diamond to Lady Hodson from Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd., which was in negotiation with the Sierra Leone Government for diamond-mining rights. (CO. 267/642/2094/1933; this incident is also discussed in Kaniki, Michael, ‘Economic change in Sierra Leone during the 1930s’, Trans-African Journal of History, III, I-II (1973), 72–95.)Google Scholar

86 Wickizer, V. D., Coffee, Tea and Cocoa: An Economic and Political Analysis (Stanford, 1951), 324.Google Scholar

87 W.A.C.P.B. Policy Paper No. 7, 24 Nov. 1942, C.O. 852/533/3/42.Google Scholar

88 CO to Gold Coast and Nigeria, 1 Dec. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/PT3/39.Google Scholar

89 Minute by Clauson, 11 Sept. 1940, CO. 852/318/18015/1K/40.Google Scholar

90 Nigeria to C.O., 13 May 1944, CO. 852/595/19601/9/4/44.Google Scholar

91 Gold Coast to C.O., 11 Feb. 1945;Google ScholarNigeria to C.O., 15 Feb. 1945, C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/45.Google Scholar

92 CO. to Gold Coast and Nigeria, 22 Nov. CO. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT3/45.Google Scholar

93 Ibid.