Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:17:13.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Missionaries and the Ethnolinguistic Factor During the ‘Invention of Tribalism’ in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Herbert Chimhundu
Herbert Chimhundu
Affiliation:
University of Zimbabwe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is evidence from across the disciplines that at least some of the contemporary regional names of African tribes, dialects and languages are fairly recent inventions in historical terms. This article offers some evidence from Zimbabwe to show that missionary linguistic politics were an important factor in this process. The South African linguist Clement Doke was brought in to resolve conflicts about the orthography of Shona. His Report on the Unification of the Shona Dialects (1931) shows how the language politics of the Christian denominations, which were also the factions within the umbrella organization the Southern Rhodesia Missionary Conference, contributed quite significantly to the creation and promotion of Zezuru, Karanga and Manyika as the main groupings of dialects in the central area which Doke later accommodated in a unified orthography of a unified language that was given the name Shona. While vocabulary from Ndau was to be incorporated, words from the Korekore group in the north were to be discouraged, and Kalanga in the West was allowed to be subsumed under Ndebele.

Writing about sixty years later, Ranger focusses more closely on the Manyika and takes his discussion to the 1940s, but he also mentions that the Rhodesian Front government of the 1960s and 1970s deliberately incited tribalism between the Shona and the Ndebele, while at the same time magnifying the differences between the regional divisions of the Shona, which were, in turn, played against one another as constituent clans. It would appear then that, for the indigenous Africans, the price of Christianity, Western education and a new perception of language unity was the creation of regional ethnic identities that were at least potentially antagonistic and open to political manipulation.

Through many decades of rather unnecessary intellectual justification, and as a result of the collective colonial experience through the churches, the schools and the workplaces, these imposed identities, and the myths and sentiments that are associated with them, have become fixed in the collective mind of Africa, and the modern nation states of the continent now seem to be stuck with them. Missionaries played a very significant role in creating this scenario because they were mainly responsible for fixing the ethnolinguistic maps of the African colonies during the early phase of European occupation. To a significant degree, these maps have remained intact and have continued to influence African research scholarship.

Type
Colonial Zimbabwe
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 87 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ranger, Terence, The Invention of Tribalism in Zimbabwe (Gwelo, 1985).Google Scholar

2 Ranger, Terence, ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika: the invention of ethnicity in Zimbabwe’, in Vail, Leroy (ed.), The Creation of Tribalism in Southern Africa (London, 1989), 118–50.Google Scholar

3 Herbert Chimhundu, ‘The spinoffs from translation for evangelization: Zimbabwe, 1903–1928’ (paper presented at the Seminar on the ‘Translation of Words and Images’, Boston University, 15–16 12, 1989).Google Scholar

4 Doke, Clement M., Report on the Unification of the Shona Dialects (Hertford, 1931).Google Scholar

5 Tucker, A. N., ‘Sotho-Nguni orthography and tone-marking’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, XIII (1949), 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Ibid.

7 Cobbing, Julian, ‘The absent priesthood: another look at the Rhodesian risings of 1896–1897’, J. Afr. Hist., XVIII (1977), 78.Google Scholar

8 Beach, D. N., ‘Ndebele raiders and Shona power’, J. Afr. Hist., XV (1974), 633–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 5.Google Scholar

10 Ranger, , ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika’, 125–34.Google Scholar

11 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 4–5.Google Scholar

12 Ibid. 4.

13 Beach, D. N., The Shona and Zimbabwe: an Outline of Shona History (Gwelo, 1980), xii.Google Scholar

14 Oral historian Aeneas Chigwedere and Shona writer Solomon Mutswairo advanced the Mbire theory during debates on Zimbabwe Television soon after independence.

15 Hartmann, A. M., An Outline Grammar of the Mashona Language (Cape Town, 1893), 1–2.Google Scholar

16 It is hoped that someone will complete the work of the late J. C. Kumbirai, who had started formal research into Shona cosmology, which should provide the answers to some of these problems. Further research in this direction will probably show the irrelevance of the English term ‘tribe’.

17 Cf. Shanafelt, Robert, ‘Prototypes of identity: a preliminary discussion of linguistic concepts in Lesotho and South Africa’ (draft article in private circulation, University of Florida, 1990).Google Scholar

18 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 3.Google Scholar

19 Chigwedere, A. S., Birth of Bantu Africa (Bulawayo, 1982)Google Scholar; cf. his earlier work, From Mutapa to Rhodes (London, 1978).Google Scholar

20 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 3.Google Scholar

21 Mudenge, S. I. G., A Political History of Munhumutapa, c. 1400–1902 (Harare, 1988)Google Scholar; Beach, The Shona and Zimbabwe; Mufuka, Ken (with Nemerai, J. and Muzvidzwa, K.), Dzimbahwe: Life and Politics in the Golden Age, 1100–1500 A.D. (Harare, 1983)Google Scholar; and Bourdillon, M. F. C., The Shona Peoples: An Ethnography of the Contemporary Shona with Special Reference to their Religion (Gwelo, 1976).Google Scholar A considerable body of literature has been published on the subject.

22 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 4.Google Scholar

23 For example, Wentzel, P. J., The Relationship between Venda and Western Shona, vol. III (Pretoria, 1983).Google Scholar There are numerous other examples.

24 For example, older textbook accounts of the Mfecane or Nguni dispersal, particularly the portrayal of the white pioneers as having saved the Shona from the Ndebele by occupying Zimbabwe.

25 Beach, , ‘Ndebele raiders and Shona power’, 647.Google Scholar

26 Cobbing, , ‘The absent priesthood’, 72.Google Scholar

27 Ibid. 65.

28 Ibid. 81.

29 Ibid. 83.

30 Beach, , ‘Ndebele raiders and Shona power’, 651.Google Scholar

31 Ibid.

32 Ibid. 646.

33 Ibid. 648.

34 Ibid. 641.

35 Ibid. 639.

36 Ibid. 633.

37 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 6.Google Scholar

38 Ibid. Ranger here quotes the Chief Native Commissioner for Matebeleland.

39 Ranger, , ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika’, 141.Google Scholar

40 Ranger, , Invention of Tribalism, 9.Google Scholar

41 Ibid. 13.

42 Wentzel, , Venda and Western Shona, 11–12.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., summary of conflicting theories on the origins of Karanga/Shona, 9–13.

44 Fortune, G., e.g. An Analytical Grammar of Shona (London, 1955)Google Scholar; Elements of Shona, Zezuru Dialect (Cape Town, 1957)Google Scholar; and Shona Grammatical Constructions (Salisbury, (2 vols.), 1969–1977).Google Scholar

45 Hannan, M., Standard Shona Dictionary (London, 1959Google Scholar; 2nd ed. Salisbury, 1974; revised with addendum Harare, 1981).

46 Johannesburg, 1931.

47 Doke, , Report on the Unification, para. 146, recommendation 2, p. 77.Google Scholar

48 Doke, Clement M., A Comparative Study in Shona Phonetics (Johannesburg, 1931), 3.Google Scholar

49 Barnes, Bertram H., C.R., A Vocabulary of the Dialects of Mashonaland in the New Orthography (London, 1932).Google Scholar

50 O'Neil, J., A Shona Grammar, Zezuru Dialect. With notes on the Karanga and Manyika by the Rev A. A. Louw (Jnr) and the Rev B. H. Barnes (London, 1935).Google Scholar

51 However, this reference to dialect preference is dropped in Fortune, Shona Grammatical Constructions (2 vols.), 2nd ed. (Harare, 1980–1984).Google Scholar

52 Dissertations in the 1960s and 1970s focused on selected dialects, e.g. Dembetembe, N. C., ‘Verbal constructions in Korekore dialect’ (M.Phil, thesis, Univ. of Zimbabwe, 1969)Google Scholar; cf. his ‘Three Korekore dialects’, African Language Studies, XV (1974), 143–72Google Scholar; and Mkanganwi, K. G., ‘An outline of the morphology of substantives in Ndau with a preliminary note on Ndau phonology’ (M.Phil. thesis, Univ. of Zimbabwe, 1972).Google Scholar

53 Bhebe, Ngwabi, Christianity and Traditional Religion in Western Zimbabwe, 1859–1923 (London, 1979), 129–30.Google Scholar

54 Ranger, T. O., The African Voice in Southern Rhodesia (London, 1970), 16.Google Scholar

55 Chimhundu, , ‘The spinoffs from translation for evangelization’, 7.Google Scholar

56 Ranger, quoting from a letter by Fr C. Bert to Msgr Sykes, 1 Oct., 1911, ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika’, 135.

57 Fig. 1, in Doke, Comparative Study.

58 Atkinson, N. D., ‘The missionary contribution to early education in Rhodesia’, in Dachs, J. A. (ed.), Christianity South of the Zambezi (Gwelo, 1973), i, 95.Google Scholar

59 Zvogbo, C. J. M., ‘The influence of the Wesleyan Methodist Missions in Southern Rhodesia, 1891–1923’, in Dachs, (ed.), Christianity South of the Zambezi, i, 63.Google Scholar

60 Ibid. 63–82.

61 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 5.Google Scholar

62 Ibid. 3.

63 Ibid.

64 Mrs Helen Springer was the chief spokesperson on orthography and language matters for the Episcopal Methodists operating from Old Umtali.

65 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 5.Google Scholar

66 Ranger, , ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika’, 132.Google Scholar

67 Ibid. 131–2.

68 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 5.Google Scholar

69 Ranger, , ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika’, 136–7.Google Scholar

70 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 12.Google Scholar

71 Doke, , Comparative Study, iii.Google Scholar

72 Ibid.

73 This book has had a dominant influence on students of Shona phonetics to the present.

74 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 81.Google Scholar

75 Ibid. 51.

76 Ibid. para. 156, Recommendation 7(e), p. 86.

77 Mkanganwi, K. G., ‘A description of Shona spelling’, African Languages/Langues Africaines, I (1975), 225–58Google Scholar; and his ‘Orthographic problems and decisions: the Zimbabwean experience’ (Third Biennial Workshop of the International Group for the Study of Standardization and Vernacularization of Literacy, Univ. of York, 26–28 03, 1990).Google Scholar

78 Fortune, G., A Guide to Shona Spelling (Salisbury, 1972).Google Scholar

79 Chimhundu, Herbert, ‘Monolingual dictionaries in African languages: problems and prospects’ (21st Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Univ. of Georgia at Athens, 12–14 04 1990).Google Scholar

80 George Fortune was the founding Professor of the Department of African Languages at the University of Zimbabwe and remained Head of Department for twenty years, to 1980, when he retired. His work in Shona was extensive (see note 85 below).

81 Chimhundu, Herbert, ‘Adoption and adaptation in Shona’ (unpublished D.Phil. thesis, Univ. of Zimbabwe, 1983)Google Scholar; cf. his ‘Some problems relating to the incorporation of loanwords in the lexicon’, Zambezia, VII (1979), 75–91.Google Scholar

82 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 103.Google Scholar

83 R. G. Sisimayi to Members of the Interim Committee, African Languages Committee, 10 Jan., 1990, C/C/311 Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education, Zimbabwe.

84 Doke, , Report on the Unification, 104.Google Scholar

85 The Fortune Collection, which has now been acquired by the University of Florida, was a very useful source for this article.

86 Anon, ., ‘Steps in the development of standard Shona’, p. 12Google Scholar, in ‘The principal dialects of Shona and the development of the standard language’ (Univ. of Zimbabwe course notes).

87 Anon., ‘Efforts towards the unification of Shona’, in ‘The principal dialects of Shona’.

88 The writer has compiled a catalogue of clippings showing common errors in Shona spelling and word division for teaching purposes.

89 Chimhundu, Herbert, ‘An assessment of the achievements of Zimbabwean writers in African languages’, forthcoming.Google Scholar

90 Kahari, G. P., The Search for a Zimbabwean Identity (Gwelo, 1980).Google Scholar