Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T05:57:16.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developmental changes in beef steers as influenced by fattening, age and type of ration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. C. Luitingh
Affiliation:
The Livestock and Meat Industries Control Board, Pretoria

Extract

1. The effect of fattening, age and the ratio of concentrates to roughage in a ration on the development of beef steers was investigated. The specific purpose was to study developmental patterns during the short-term fattening of beef steers of different ages in order to ascertain to what extent beef steers improved in the proportions of the various body parts, offals, organs and tissues.

2. The experimental material consisted of 104 beef steers of three age-groups, namely, ± 8, ± 20 and ± 32 months old, fed on rations differing in the ratio of concentrates to roughage and 36 control steers of the same age-groups, slaughtered at the start of the experiment.

3. When the weights of the parts of the carcasses were expressed as a percentage of the carcass weight, it was found that with the exception of a few parts, the percentage which the parts constituted of the carcass remained remarkably constant in the various groups. The effect of age in both the fattened and unfattened groups was comparatively small, whilst the effect of fattening was of slightly greater magnitude. The effect of the ration concentration per se was negligible.

4. The parts where fat was deposited formed a significantly (P < 0·01) larger percentage of the carcass of the fattened than of the unfattened steers (kidney and channel fat, thin flank and cod, brisket, plate and neck).

5. The shoulder, chuck and buttock and rump, formed a significantly (P < 0·01) lower percentage of the carcasses of the fattened than of the unfattened steers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bessessen, A. N. & Carlson, H. A. (1923). Amer. J. Anat. 31, 483521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisschop, J. H. R. (1956). Unpublished diagram.Google Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. (1939). Publ. Univ. Pretoria, ser. 1, no. 48.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and growth. New York: Reinholdt.Google Scholar
Brody, S. & Kibler, H. H. (1941). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 328.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. J. & Latham, J. O. (1957). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 25, 339–55.Google Scholar
Bull, S., Olson, F. C. & Longwell, J. H. (1930). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 355.Google Scholar
Butler, O. D., Garber, M. J. & Smith, R. L. (1956). J. Anim Sci. 15, 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 174–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrel, A. (1958). Man the Unknown, 16th impression. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Committee on Animal Nutrition (1950). Rep. Nat. Res. Coun. no. IV.Google Scholar
Crile, G. & Quiring, D. P. (1940). Ohio J. Sci. 40, 219–59.Google Scholar
Eaton, O. N. (1938). Amer. J. Anat. 31, 483521.Google Scholar
Edinger, A. T. (1925). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 38.Google Scholar
Experimental Procedure Adopted for Use at the Meat Research Institute at Onderstepoort (1940). (Unpublished.) Compiled by a departmental Committee of the Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932 a). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932 b). J.R. Agric. Soc. 93, 115.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1936). Festschrift Prof. Duerst. Bern.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G. & Howe, P. E. (1946). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric. no. 926.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G. & Titus, H. W. (1939). Yearb. Agric. U.S. Dep. Agric. 450–68.Google Scholar
Helser, M. D. (1930). Bull. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 272.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1939). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 12, 379550.Google Scholar
Hogan, A. G. (1929). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 123.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1959). S. Afr. J. Sci. 55, 139–45.Google Scholar
Kidwell, J. F. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, J. F., Hunter, J. E., Ternan, P. R., Harper, J. E., Shelby, C. E. & Clark, R. T. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 894908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraybill, H. F., Hiner, R. L. & Farnworth, V. M. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 276343, 387436, 511–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, C. R., Trowbridge, P. F. & Haigh, L. D. (1921). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 43.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. R., Trowbridge, P. F. & Haigh, L. D. (1922). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 54.Google Scholar
Pálsson, H. (1955). Ch. 2 in Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, vol. II. Ed. Hammond, J.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Pálsson, H. & Verges, J. B. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. (1955). Ch. 1 in Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals. Vol. II. Ed. Hammond, J.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1955). Statistical Methods. 4th edition. Ames: Iowa State Coll. Press.Google Scholar
Van Jaarsveld, S. R. (1949). M.Sc. (Agric.)—thesis. Univ. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 93153, 243401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, J. J. (1956). B.Sc. (Agric.)—thesis Univ. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Winters, L. M. & Feuffel, G. (1936). Tech. Bull. Univ. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 118.Google Scholar
Winters, L. M., Green, W. W. & Comstock, R. E. (1942). Tech. Bull. Univ. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 151.Google Scholar