Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:30:38.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tillering pattern in barley varieties: I. Production, survival and contribution to yield by component tillers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Q. Cannell
R. Q. Cannell
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two field experiments have been conducted to investigate the pattern of tillering, ear emergence and survival of the component tillers of three barley varieties, representing old and new varieties. The varieties were grown under contrasting nitrogen fertilizer levels and plant spacings. The results reported are for the variety means and variety x nitrogen and variety x spacing interactions. After the main stem (M) the most frequently occurring tiller was the tiller appearing in the axil of the first true leaf (T2), followed by the coleoptile node tiller (T1) and the tiller in the axil of the second true leaf (T3). The T1 tiller occurred most frequently in the newest variety, Deba Abed, and least in the oldest one, Spratt Archer. Survival rates of the shoots were highest in M, followed by T2, T1 and T3. Higher-order tillers occurred relatively infrequently and had low survival rates. M contributed the largest percentage of the grain yield, followed by T2, T1 and T3. The 13% grain yield advantage of Deba Abed over Spratt Archer was mainly accounted for by the difference in production by the T1 tiller. The results are discussed in. relation to the only other known paper on component tillers in barley.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 1969 , pp. 405 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aspinall, D. (1961). The control of tillering in the barley plant. I. The pattern of tillering and its relation to nutrient supply. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 14, 493–505.Google Scholar
Aspinall, D. (1963). The control of tillering in the barley plant. II. The control of tiller-bud growth during ear development. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 16, 285–304.Google Scholar
Aspinall, D. & Paleg, L. G. (1964). Effects of day length and light intensity on growth of barley. III. Vegetative development. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 17, 807–22.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A. (1952). The effect of seed-rate on yield ofcereals. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 20, 115–22.Google Scholar
Bunting, A. H. & Drennan, D. S. H. (1966). Some aspects of the morphology and physiology of cereals in the vegetative phase. In The Growth of Cereals and Qrasses, ed. Milthorpe, P. L. and Ivins, J. D.. 359 pp. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. (1968a). Physiological studies of yield of cereal crops. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Cawosll, R. Q. (1968b). The tillering pattern in barley varieties. II. The effect of temperature, light intensity and daylight on the frequency of occurrence of the coleoptile node and second tillers in barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 423–35.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. P. & Saeed, S. W. (1949). Studies on growth and development in Lolium. I. Relation of the annual habit to head production under various systems of cutting. J. Ecol. 37, 233–59.Google Scholar
Engledow, F. L. (1926). A census of an acre of barley. J. R. agric. Soc. Eng. 87, 103–23.Google Scholar
Engledow, F. L. & Ramiath, K. (1930). Investigations of yield in cereals. VII. A study of development and yield in wheat based upon varietal comparison. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 20, 265–344.Google Scholar
Engledow, F. L. & Wadham, S. M. (1924). Investigations on yield in cereals. I. Part II cont. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 14, 80–5.Google Scholar
Fiddian, W. E. H. (1967). Cereal growing in the seventies. Devon County Agricultural Association Lecture, Seale-Hayne Agricultural College.Google Scholar
Friend, D. J. C. (1965). Tillering and leaf production in wheat as affected by temperature and light intensity. Can. J. Bot. 43, 1063–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, E. N. (1967). Quality in wheat and barley. Ann. appl. Biol. 59, 321–4.Google Scholar
Harmesen, G. W. & Van Schreven, D. A. (1955). Mineralization of organic nitrogen in soil. Adv. agron. 7, 300–98.Google Scholar
Joffe, A. & Small, J. G. A. (1963). A tendency to perennation in the cereals. Nature, Lond. 198, 768–70.Google Scholar
Kanda, M. & Kakizak, Y. (1953). Studies on the growth habits of rice plant varieties. Sci. Rep. Res. Inst. Tohuku Univ. D 5, 49–78.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1967). The effect of plant density upon the growth and yield of barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 317–24.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, K. (1963). Studies in the physiology of yield of cereals. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1956). Growth and nutrition of timothy (Phleum pratense). I. The life history of individual tillers. Ann. appl. Biol. 44, 166–87.Google Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1963). Tillering in herbago grasses. Herb. Abstr. 33, 141–8.Google Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1965). A study of New Zealand wheats. I. Growth and yield characteristics. N.Z. J. agric. Res. 8, 10–14.Google Scholar
Laude, H. M., Ridley, J. R. & Suneson, C. A. (1967). Tiller senescence and grain development in barley. Crop Sci. 7, 231–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. C. (1949). The control of tillering in grasses by auxin. Am. J. Bot. 36, 437–40.Google Scholar
Puckridge, P. W. (1962). The effect of competition among wheat plants sown at a wide range of densities, with particular reference to light and leaf area. (Seen in Bunting & Drennan, 1966.) B.Agric.Sci. thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
De Silva, W. H. (1961). Studies in the crop physiology of wheat. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Stern, W. R. & Beech, D. F. (1965). The growth of safflower (Cartha-mus tinctomus L.) in a low latitude environment. Aust. J. agric. Res. 16, 801–16.Google Scholar
Stoy, V. (1965). Photosynthesis, respiration and carbohydrate accummulation in spring wheat in relation to yield. Physiol. Plant. Supplement IV, pp. 1–125.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1962). Survival of tillers and distribution of dry matter between ear and shoot of barley varieties. Ann. Bot. 26, 37–54.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1966). Physiological aspects of grain yield in cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and drosses, ed. Milthorpe, F. L. and Ivins, J. D.. 359 pp. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1936). The effect of supplying nitrogenous fertilizer to wheat at different stages of growth. J. agric. Sci. 26, 391–44.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1958). Physiological causes of differences in grain yield between varieties of barley. Ann. Bot. 22, 321–51.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1963). Analysis of growth and yield of winter and spring wheats. Ann. Bot. 27, 1–22.Google Scholar