Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T20:53:38.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The digestibility and acceptability to sheep of chopped or milled barley straw soaked or sprayed with alkali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Fernandez Carmona
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
J. F. D. Greenhalgh
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

The main objective of the experiments described was to compare the effects of milling straw and/or soaking or spraying it with sodium hydroxide on its digestibility and acceptability to sheep. Some preliminary trials were made in the laboratory to compare different alkali treatments with respect to losses of organic matter, chemical composition and digestibility in vitro.

In a feeding trial of Latin-square design, involving six sheep, the following treatments of barley straw were compared: C, chopped; M, coarsely-milled; OIL, chopped and soaked in 1·5% NaOH (9 g NaOH/100 g straw); CIH, chopped and soaked in 3·0% NaOH (18 g/100 g straw); CS, chopped and sprayed with 16 % NaOH (8 g/100 g straw); MS, milled and sprayed with 16 % NaOH. After treatments OIL and CIH the straw was washed; this caused losses of organic matter of 28 and 32%, respectively. For CS and CM the excess NaOH was neutralized by addition of 7·4 ml propionic acid/100 g straw.

The straws were given with supplements of purified soya protein, minerals and vitamins. The digestibility of energy for the straw was (%): C, 40·4; M, 39·1; CIL, 65·0; CIH, 64·4; CS, 57·3; MS, 60·2. Dry-matter intake (g/kg W0·75 per day) was: C, 26·7; M, 36·2; CIL, 37·1; CIH, 44·2; CS, 48·4; MS 53·6.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, B. H. & McGowan, Ms. (1966). The routine determination of in vitro digestibility of organic matter in forages – an investigation of the problems associated with continuous large-scale operation. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 21, 140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis. Washington: A. O. A. C.Google Scholar
Beckmann, E. (1921). Conversion of grain straw and lupins into feeds of high nutrient value. Festschr. Kaiser Wilhelm Qes. Forderung. Wiss. Zehnjahrigen Jubilaum, pp. 1826. (See Ghem. Abstr. 16, 765.)Google Scholar
Chandra, S. & Jackson, M. G. (1971). A study of various chemical treatments to remove lignin from coarse roughages and increase their digestibiliy. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, E., Adeleye, I. O. A. & Jones, T. A. O. C. (1969). Effects of urea supplementation on the nutritive value of NaOH-treated straw. In Celluloses and their Applications, ed. Gould, B. F.. Washington D. C.: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. (1943). The digestibility of straw pulp. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 33, 174–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. (1953). The effect of quality and quantity of carbohydrate and protein in the ration of the sheep on the digestibility of cellulose and other constituents of the ration, with a note on the effect of adding vitamins of the β-complex on the digestibility and retention of the nutrients of a hay ration. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 43, 281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M., Andrews, B. P., Macleod, N. A. & Walker, T. (1968). Urea and cereals as supplements for ruminants offered barley straw. Anim. Prod. 10, 171–5.Google Scholar
Kay, M., Macdearmid, A. & Massie, B. (1970). Intensive beef production. 11. Beplacement of cereals with ground straw. Anim. Prod. 12, 419–24.Google Scholar
Ololade, B. G., Mowatt, D. N. & Winch, J. E. (1970). Effect of processing methods on the in vitro digestibility of sodium hydroxide treated roughages. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50, 657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, D. W., Swan, H. & Lamming, G. E. (1969). Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 4. The use of ground straw of different particle sizes for cattle from twelve weeks of age. Anim. Prod. 11, 543–50.Google Scholar
Raven, A. M., Forbes, T. J. & Irwin, J. H. D. (1969). The utilization by beef cattle of concentrate diets containing different levels of milled straw and of protein. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F., Balch, C. C., Campling, R.C. & Fisher, L. J. (1963). The utilization of acetic, propionic and butyric acids by growing heifers. Br. J. Nutr. 17, 399406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squires, V. R. & Wilson, A. D. (1971). Distance between food and water supply and its effect on drinking frequency, and food and water intake of Merino and Border Leicester sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 22, 283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. & Jackson, M. (1971). The effect of different levels of sodium hydroxide spray treatment of wheat straw on consumption and digestibility by cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46, 829–35.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1968). Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fiber with permanganate. J. Asa. off. agric. Chem. 51, 780–5.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D. (1966). The value of Atriplex (saltbush) and Kochlia (bluebush) species as food for sheep. Aust. J. agric. Bes. 17, 147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. K. & O'Shea, J. (1964). In vitroproduction of volatile fatty acids and dry matter digestibility of wheat straw as affected by alkali treatment. Irish J. agric. Res. 3, 245–6.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. K. & Pigden, W. J. (1964). Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment on the utilization of wheat straw and poplar wood by rumen microorganisms. Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 122–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar