Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:52:22.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Live weight gain, urinary nitrogen excretion and urination behaviour of dairy heifers grazing pasture, chicory and plantain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2017

L. CHENG ,
J. MCCORMICK ,
A. N. HUSSEIN ,
C. LOGAN ,
D. PACHECO ,
M. C. HODGE  and
G. R. EDWARDS
L. CHENG*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, New Zealand
J. MCCORMICK
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, New Zealand
A. N. HUSSEIN
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, New Zealand
C. LOGAN
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, New Zealand
D. PACHECO
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand
M. C. HODGE
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, New Zealand
G. R. EDWARDS*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, New Zealand
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Emails: paulchengnz@yahoo.com.au and grant.edwards@lincoln.ac.nz
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Emails: paulchengnz@yahoo.com.au and grant.edwards@lincoln.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The objective of the present study was to investigate live weight (LW) gain, urinary nitrogen (UN) excretion and urination behaviour of dairy heifers grazing pasture, chicory and plantain in autumn and spring. The study comprised a 35-day autumn trial (with a 7-day acclimation period) and a 28-days spring trial (with a 7-day acclimation period). For each trial, 56 Friesian × Jersey heifers were blocked into five dietary treatments balanced for their LW and breeding worth (i.e. genetic merit of a cow for production and reproduction): 1·00 perennial ryegrass–white clover pasture (PA); 1·00 chicory (CH); 1·00 plantain (PL); 0·50 pasture + 0·50 chicory (PA + CH); and 0·50 pasture + 0·50 plantain (PA + PL). A fresh allocation of the herbage was offered every 3 days with allowance calculated according to feed requirement for maintenance plus gain of 1·0 kg LW/day. In both trials, LW gain was lower on CH than other treatments. In the spring trial, UN concentration and UN excretion were lower in CH and PL than other treatments. In autumn, a higher urination frequency was observed over the first 6 h after forage allocation in CH and PA + CH than other treatments. Data from the present study indicate that feeding CH alone limited heifer LW gain. However, heifers grazing swards containing chicory (CH and PA + CH) and plantain (PL and PA + PL) had the potential to lower nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching from soil compared with heifers grazing PA, by reducing N loading in urine patches.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 4 , May 2017 , pp. 669 - 678
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barry, T. N. (1998). The feeding value of chicory (Cichorium intybus) for ruminant livestock. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betteridge, K., Costall, D. A., Li, F. Y., Luo, D. & Ganesh, S. (2013). Why we need to know what and where cows are urinating – a urine sensor to improve nitrogen models. Proceeding of New Zealand Grassland Association 75, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, J. L., Waghorn, G. C. & Chaves, A. V. (2002). Improving animal performance using forage-based diets. Proceeding of New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62, 267–272.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. F., Tharmaraj, J. & Nie, Z. N. (2008). Milk-production potential of different sward types in a temperature southern Australian environment. Grass and Forage Science 63, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Kim, E. J., Merry, R. J. & Dewhurst, R. J. (2011). Nitrogen partitioning and isotopic fractionation in dairy cows consuming diets based on a range of contrasting forages. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2031–2041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, L., Woodward, S. L., Dewhurst, R. J., Zhou, H. & Edwards, G. R. (2014). Nitrogen partitioning, energy use efficiency and isotopic fractionation measurements from cows differing in genetic merit fed low-quality pasture in late lactation. Animal Production Science 54, 1651–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corson, D. C., Waghorn, G. C., Ulyatt, M. J. & Lee, J. (1999). Forage analysis and livestock feeding. Proceeding of New Zealand Grassland Association 61, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaker, J. M., Young, M. J., Fraser, T. J. & Rowarth, J. S. (1994). Carcass, liver and kidney characteristics of lambs grazing plantain (Plantago lanceolata), chicory (Cichorium intybus), white clover (Trifolium repens) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Proceeding of New Zealand Society of Animal Production 54, 197–200.Google Scholar
Di, H. J. & Cameron, K. C. (2002). Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 64, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowman, M. G. & Collins, F. C. (1982). The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S. K., Dipu, M. T., Mehra, U. R., Singh, P., Verma, A. K. & Ramgaokar, J. S. (2006). Improved HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of allantoin, uric acid and creatinine in cattle urine. Journal of Chromatography B 832, 134–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonda, H. L. (1995). Nutritional status of ruminants determined from excretion and concentration of metabolites in body fluids. PhD thesis, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Gregorini, P., Minnee, E. M. K., Griffiths, W. & Lee, J. M. (2013). Dairy cows increase ingestive mastication and reduce ruminative chewing when grazing chicory and plantain. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 7798–7805.Google Scholar
Handcock, R. C., Hickson, R. E. & Back, P. J. (2015). The use of herb mix and lucerne to increase growth rates of dairy heifers. Proceeding of New Zealand Society Animal Production 75, 132–135.Google Scholar
Hoskin, S. O., Barry, T. N. & Wilson, P. R. (2003). The role of plants containing secondary compounds in sustainable deer farming – a review. In Nutrition and Management of Deer on Grazing Systems (Symposium Proceedings 2002), pp. 101–112. Grassland Research and Practice Series 9. Lincoln, New Zealand: New Zealand Grassland Association.Google Scholar
Kenyon, P. R., Kemp, P. D., Stafford, K. J., West, D. M. & Morris, S. T. (2010). Can a herb and white clover mix improve the performance of multiple-bearing ewes and their lambs to weaning? Animal Production Science 50, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, R. A., Dinneen, M. M. & Russek-Cohen, E. (2005). Using blood urea nitrogen to predict nitrogen excretion and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle, sheep, goats, horses, pigs, and rats. Journal of Animal Science 83, 879–889.Google Scholar
Kusmartono, S. A. & Barry, T. N. (1997). Rumen digestion and rumen outflow rate in deer fed fresh chicory (Cichorium intybus) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Davies, H. (1962). Intake studies in sheep involving high fluid intake. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 4, 167–171.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K. A., Penno, J. W., Bryant, A. M. & Roche, J. R. (2005). Effect of feeding level pre- and post-puberty and body weight at first calving on growth, milk production and fertility in grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 3363–3375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijs, J. A. C., Walters, R. J. K. & Keen, A. (1982). Sward methods. In Herbage Intake Handbook (Eds Leaver, J. D.), pp. 11–36. Hurley, Berkshire, UK: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Moorby, J. M., Evans, R. T., Scollan, N. D., MacRae, J. C. & Theodorou, M. T. (2006). Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): evaluation in dairy cows in early lactation. Grass and Forage Science 61, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, S. K., Ward, G. N. & Jacobs, J. L. (2014). Milk production and composition of mid-lactation cows consuming perennial ryegrass- and chicory-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 1005–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, A. M. & Brookes, I. M. (2007). The metabolisable energy requirements of grazing livestock. In Pasture and Supplements for Grazing Animals (Eds Rattray, P. V., Brookes, I. M. & Nicol, A. M.), pp. 151–172. Occasional Publication no. 14. Hamilton, New Zealand: New Zealand Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Owens, F. N., Secrist, D. S., Hill, W. J. & Gill, D. R. (1998). Acidosis in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76, 275–286.Google Scholar
Pacheco, D. & Waghorn, G. C. (2008). Dietary nitrogen – definitions, excretion and consequences of excess for grazing ruminants. Proceeding of New Zealand Grassland Association 70, 107–116.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. J., Edwards, G. R., Newton, P. C. D., Chapman, D. F., Caradus, J. R., Rasmussen, S. & Rowarth, J. S. (2011). Past lessons and future prospects: plant breeding for yield and persistence in cool temperate pastures. Grass and Forage Science 66, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R., Murray, D., Harding, S., Baird, D. & Soutar, D. (2015). Introduction to GenStat® for WindowsTM. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International. Available from: http://www.vsni.co.uk/resources/documentation/genstat-guide-introduction/ (verified 9 November 2016).Google Scholar
Pembleton, K. G., Tozer, K. N., Edwards, G. R., Jacobs, J. L. & Turner, L. R. (2015). Simple v. diverse pastures: opportunities and challenges in dairy systems. Animal Production Science 55, 893–901.Google Scholar
Reed, K. F., Moraes, L. E., Casper, D. P. & Kebreab, E. (2015). Prediction of nitrogen excretion from cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 3025–3035.Google Scholar
Roughan, G. P. & Hollan, R. (1977). Predicting in vivo digestibilities of herbage by exhaustive enzymatic hydrolysis of cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 1057–1064.Google Scholar
Schreurs, N. M., Molan, A. L., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Barry, T. N. & McNabb, W. C. (2002). Effect of grazing undrenched weaner deer on chicory or perennial ryegrass–white clover pasture on gastrointestinal nematode and lungworm viability. Proceeding of New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62, 143–144.Google Scholar
Tamura, Y. & Nishibe, S. (2002). Changes in the concentrations of bioactive compounds in plantain leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 2514–2518.Google Scholar
Totty, V. K., Greenwood, S. L., Bryant, R. H. & Edwards, G. R. (2013). Nitrogen partitioning and milk production of dairy cows grazing simple and diverse pastures. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentine, I. & Kemp, P. D. (2007). Pasture and supplement resources. In Pasture and Supplements for Grazing Animals (Eds Rattray, P. V., Brookes, I. M. & Nicol, A. M.), pp. 3–11. Occasional Publication no. 14. Hamilton, New Zealand: New Zealand Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Waugh, C. D., Clark, D. A., Harris, S. L., Thom, E. R., Copeman, P. J. A. & Napper, A. R. (1998). Chicory for milk production. Proceeding of New Zealand Grassland Association 60, 33–37.Google Scholar
Wheadon, N. M., McGee, M., Edwards, G. R. & Dewhurst, R. J. (2014). Plasma nitrogen isotropic fractionation and feed efficiency in growing beef heifers. British Journal of Nutrition 111, 1705–1711.Google Scholar