Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T13:35:21.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental and numerical investigation of inertial particle clustering in isotropic turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2008

JUAN P. L. C. SALAZAR ,
JEREMY DE JONG ,
LUJIE CAO ,
SCOTT H. WOODWARD ,
HUI MENG  and
LANCE R. COLLINS
JUAN P. L. C. SALAZAR
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–7501, USA
JEREMY DE JONG
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260–4400, USA
LUJIE CAO
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260–4400, USA
SCOTT H. WOODWARD
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260–4400, USA
HUI MENG
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260–4400, USA
LANCE R. COLLINS*
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–7501, USA
*
†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: LC246@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the first detailed comparisons between experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS) of inertial particle clustering in nearly isotropic ‘box turbulence’. The experimental system consists of a box 38cm in each dimension with fans in the eight corners that sustain nearly isotropic turbulence in the centre of the box. We inject hollow glass spheres with a mean diameter of 6 μm and measure the locations of several hundred particles in a 1 cm3 volume in the centre of the box using three-dimensional digital holographic particle imaging. We observe particle concentration fluctuations that result from inertial clustering (sometimes called ‘preferential concentration’). The radial distribution function (RDF), a statistical measure of clustering, has been calculated from the particle position field. We select this measure because of its relevance to the collision kernel for particles. DNS of the equivalent system, with nearly perfect parameter overlap, have also been performed. We observe good agreement between the RDF predictions of the DNS and the experimental observations, despite some challenges in the interpretation of the experiments. The results provide important guidance on ways to improve the measurement.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 600 , 10 April 2008 , pp. 245 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A., Hainaux, F. & Lasheras, J. C. 2002 Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F. 2007 Heavy particle concentration in turbulence at dissipative and inertial scales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 084502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, L. H. & Gould, R. D. 1996 Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exps. Fluids 22, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrut, J. P. & Trefethen, L. N. 2004 Barycentric Lagrange interpolation. SIAM Rev. 46, 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birouk, M., Chauveau, C., Sarh, B., Quilgars, A. & Gökalp, I. 1996 Turbulence effects on the vaporization of monocomponent single droplets. Combust. Sci. Technol. 113–114, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, M., Simonin, O. & Squires, K. D. 1998 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 375, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brucker, K. A., Isaza, J. C., Vaithianathan, T. & Collins, L. R. 2007 Efficient algorithm for simulating homogeneous turbulent shear flow without remeshing. J. Comput. Phys. 225, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, L., Pan, G., Woodward, S. & Meng, H. 2007 Hybrid digital holographic imaging system for 3D dense particle field measurement. In 7th Intl Symp. on Particle Image Velocimetry. PIV2007.Google Scholar
Chun, J., Koch, D. L., Rani, S., Ahluwalia, A. & Collins, L. R. 2005 Clustering of aerosol particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 219–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. R. & Keswani, A. 2004 Reynolds number scaling of particle clustering in turbulent aerosols. New J. Phys. 6, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Fessler, J. R. 1994 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkovich, G., Fouxon, A. & Stepanov, M. G. 2002 Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence. Nature 419, 151–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I. 1983 Characterizations of strange attractors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzer, G. L. & Collins, L. R. 2002 Relationship between the intrinsic radial distribution function for an isotropic field of particles and lower-dimensional measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 459, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, J. & Meng, H. 2007 Digital holographic particle validation via complex wave. Appl. Optics 46, 7652–7661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jong, J., Cao, L., Woodward, S., Salazar, J. P. L. C., Collins, L. R. & Meng, H. 2007 Dissipation measurement in zero-mean-flow isotropic turbulence. Exps. Fluids (submitted).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, S. J. & McClintock, F. A. 1953 Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech. Engng 75, 3–8.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, D. A. 1976 Statistical Mechanics. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. R. 1987 The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M. R. & Riley, J. J. 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, H., Pan, G. & Pu, Y. 2004 Holographic particle image velocimetry: from film to digital recording. Measurement Sci. Technol. 15, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, R., Zozylya, A., Benoit, M. & Klaus, D. 2002 Microgravity materials and life sciences research applications of digital holography. Appl. Optics 41, 3927–3935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, G. 2003 Digital holographic imaging for 3D particle and flow measurement. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Pan, G. & Meng, H. 2003 Digital holography of particle fields: reconstruction by use of complex amplitude. Appl. Optics 42, 827–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reade, W. C. & Collins, L. R. 2000 a Effect of preferential concentration on turbulent collision rates. Phys. Fluids 12, 2530–2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, W. C. & Collins, L. R. 2000 b A numerical study of the particle size distribution of an aerosol undergoing turbulent coagulation. J. Fluid Mech. 415, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saw, E. W., Shaw, R. A., Ayyalasomayajula, S., Chuang, P. Y. & Gylfason, A. 2007 Inertial clustering of particles in high-Reynolds-number turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R. A. 2003 Particle–turbulence interactions in atmospheric clouds. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 183–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R. A., Reade, W. C., Collins, L. R. & Verlinde, J. 1998 Preferential concentration of cloud droplets by turbulence: effects on the early evolution of cumulus cloud droplet spectra. J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 1965–1976.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, K. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1991 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1169–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1995 On the universality of the Kolmogorov constant. Phys. Fluids 7, 2778–2784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. R. 1997 Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 335, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. R. 1999 A numerical study of the modulation of isotropic turbulence by suspended particles. J. Fluid Mech. 379, 105–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.-P. & Maxey, M. R. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.-P., Wexler, A. S. & Zhou, Y. 2000 Statistical mechanical description and modelling of turbulent collision of inertial particles. J. Fluid Mech. 415, 117–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkowska, A., Brasseur, J. G. & Juvé, D. 1997 Numerical study of noise from isotropic turbulence. J. Comput. Acoust. 5, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Hwang, W. & Eaton, J. K. 2005 Preferential concentration of particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 31, 1220–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L., Jericho, M., Meinertzhagen, I. & Kreuzer, H. 2001 Digital in-line holography for biological applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 98, 11 301–11 305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaichik, L. I. & Alipchenkov, V. M. 2003 Pair dispersion and preferential concentration of particles in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, 1776–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar