Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T00:15:31.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turbulent channel flow: comparison of streamwise velocity data from experiments and direct numerical simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

J. P. MONTY*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
M. S. CHONG
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
Email address for correspondence: montyjp@unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

Recently there has been remarkable progress made in the direct numerical simulation (DNS) of wall-bounded turbulence, particularly of turbulent channel flow, with numerical data now available above Reτ ≈ 2000 (Hoyas & Jiménez, Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, 2006, p. 011702; Iwamoto et al., Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Smart Control of Turbulence, 2005). Much knowledge has been gained from these results, particularly in the areas of flow structure and dynamics. Yet, while the value of such simulations is undoubted, only very limited comparisons with experimental data have been documented. Although the physics of the flow are captured correctly in an ideal DNS, as with any real numerical or physical experiment, there are opportunities for misrepresentation of the characteristics of turbulence. As such, this article seeks to make a comparison between a well-documented high Reynolds number (Reτ = 934), large box size (8πh × 2h × 3πh) DNS from del Álamo et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 500, 2004, p. 135) and laboratory channel flow data measured by the authors. Results show that there is excellent agreement between the streamwise velocity statistics of the two data sets. The spectra are also very similar, however, throughout the logarithmic region the secondary peak in energy is clearly reduced in the DNS results. Although the source of the difference is not certain, the wavelengths concerned are close to the DNS box length, leading to the recommendation that longer box lengths should be investigated. Another large-scale spectral discrepancy near the wall results from the incorrect assumption of a constant convection velocity used to infer spatial information from the temporal. A near-wall convection velocity modification function is tentatively proposed. While the modification gives good agreement between the data sets, higher Reynolds number comparisons are required to better understand the intricate convection velocity issue.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

del Álamo, J. C. & Jiménez, J. 2003 Spectra of the very large anisotropic scales in turbulent channels. Phys. Fluids 15 (6), 4144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2006 Self-similar vortex clusters in the turbulent logarithmic region. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 329358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 2000 Reynolds number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 319346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, D. J. C. & Nickels, T. B. 2008 On the limitations of Taylor's hypothesis in constructing long structures in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 197206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, M., Hommema, S. E. & Adrian, R. J. 2006 Large-scale and very-large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 521542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyas, S. & Jiménez, J. 2006 Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to Re τ = 2003. Phys. Fluids 18 (011702).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 a Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 b Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365 (1852), 647–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwamoto, K., Fukagata, K., Kasagi, N. & Suzuki, Y. 2004 DNS of turbulent channel flow at re τ = 1160 and evaluation of feedback control at practical reynolds numbers. In Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Smart Control of Turbulence, February 29–March 2. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Iwamoto, K., Kasagi, N. & Suzuki, Y. 2005 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence channel flow at re τ = 2320. In Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Smart Control of Turbulence, March 6–9. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2003 Computing high-Reynolds-number turbulence: will simulations ever replace experiments? J. Turbul. 4 (22), doi:10.1088/1468-5248/4/1/022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J., del Álamo, J. C. & Flores, O. 2004 The large-scale dynamics of near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 505, 179199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S. 1954 Characteristics of turbulence in a boundary layer with zero pressure gradient. Tech. Rep. TN3178. NACA.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Shrub, F. A. & Rundstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligrani, P. M. & Bradshaw, S. 1987 Spatial resolution and measurement of turbulence in the viscous sublayer using subminiature hot-wire probes. Exp. Fluids 5, 407417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monty, J. P. 2005 Developments in smooth wall turbulent duct flows. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
Monty, J. P. & Chong, M. S. 2007 A review of recent investigations into high Reynolds number wall-turbulence. In Frontiers in Turbulence and Coherent Structures (ed. Denier, J. & Frederiksen, J. S.), pp. 227246. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickels, T. B. & Marusic, I. 2001 On the different contributions of coherent structures to the spectra of a turbulent round jet and a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 448, 367385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panton, R. L. 2007 Composite asymptotic expansions and scaling wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365 (1852), 733–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, A. E. & Abell, C. J. 1977 Asymptotic similarity of turbulence structures in smooth- and rough-walled pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 785799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1988 Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Rθ = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 6198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talamelli, A., Perisani, F., Fransson, J. J. M., Alfredsson, P. H., Johansson, A. V., Nagib, H. M., Ruedi, J. D., Sreenivasan, K. R. & Monkewitz, P. A. 2009 Ciclope – a respone to the need for high Reynolds number experiments. Fluid Dyn. Res. 41, 021407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanoun, E.-S., Durst, F. & Nagib, H. 2003 Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensionally fully developed turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 15 (10), 30793089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar