Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:04:08.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear mechanics of fluidization of beds of spherical particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

A. F. Fortes
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
D. D. Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
T. S. Lundgren
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Abstract

Experiments on fluidization with water of spherical particles falling against gravity in columns of rectangular cross-section are described. All of them are dominated by inertial effects associated with wakes. Two local mechanisms are involved: drafting and kissing and tumbling into stable cross-stream arrays. Drafting, kissing and tumbling are rearrangement mechanisms in which one sphere is captured in the wake of the other. The kissing spheres are aligned with the stream. The streamwise alignment is massively unstable and the kissing spheres tumble into more stable cross-stream pairs of doublets which can aggregate into larger relatively stable horizontal arrays. Cross-stream arrays in beds of spheres constrained to move in two dimensions are remarkable. These arrays may even coalesce into aggregations of close-packed spheres separated by regions of clear water. A somewhat weaker form of cooperative motion of cross-stream arrays of rising spheres is found in beds of square cross-section where the spheres may move freely in three dimensions. Horizontal arrays rise where drafting spheres fall because of greater drag. Aggregation of spheres seems to be associated with relatively stable cooperative motions of horizontal arrays of spheres rising in their own wakes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, E. 1974 Vortex shedding from spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 209221.Google Scholar
El-Kaissy, M. M. & Homsy, G. M. 1976 Instability waves and the origin of bubbles in fluidized beds. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 2, 379395.Google Scholar
Fanucci, J. B., Nees, N. & Yen, R. H. 1979 On the formation of bubbles in gas-particulate fluidized beds. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 353367.Google Scholar
Garside, J. & Al-Dibouni, M. 1973 Behavior of liquid fluidized beds containing a wide size distribution of solids. Fluidization and its Applications, pp. 5362. Toulouse.
Gerrard, J. H. 1966 The mechanics of the formation region of vortices behind bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 401413.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Pfeffer, R. 1960 The motion of two spheres following each other in a viscous fluid. AIChE J. 6, 129133.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. & Davidson, J. 1963 Fluidized Particles, pp. 1519. Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, D. & Davidson, J. 1971 Fluidization, pp. 4750. Academic.
Homsy, G. M., El-Kaissy, M. M. & Didwania, A. 1980 Instability waves and the origin of bubbles in fluidized bed. Part 2. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 6, 305318.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D., Nield, D. A. & Papanicolau, G. 1982 Nonlinear equation governing flow in a saturated porous medium. Water Res. J. 18,. 10491052; Erratum 1983 19, 591.Google Scholar
Kaye, B. H. & Boardman, R. P. 1962 Cluster formation in dilute suspensions. Symp. Interact. Fluids and Particles, p. 17. London.
Lamb, H. 1938 Hydrodynamics, p. 191. Dover.
Liu, J. T. C. 1982 Notes on a wave-hierarchy interpretation of fluidized bed instabilities. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 380, 229239.Google Scholar
Liu, J. T. C. 1983 Nonlinear instabilities in fluidized beds. Mechanics of Granular Materials: New Models and Constitutive Relations (ed. J. T. Jenkins & M. Satake), pp. 357364.
Oseen, C. W. 1927 Hydrodynamik, pp. 199 ff. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H.
Richardson, J. F. 1971 Incipient Fluidization and Particulate Systems. In Fluidization (ed. J. F. Davidson & D. Harrison), pp. 5051. Academic.
Richardson, J. F. & Meikle, R. A. 1964 Sedimentation and fluidization. Part 4. Drag force on individual particles in an assemblage. Trans. Instn Chem. Engrs 39, 357362.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. F. & Zaki, W. 1954 Sedimentation and fluidization. Part 1. Trans. Instn Chem. Engrs 32, 3553.Google Scholar
Rowe, P. N. 1961 Drag forces in a hydraulic model of a fluidized bed. Part 2. Trans. Instn Chem. Engrs 39, 175.Google Scholar
Rowe, P. N. & Henwood, G. A. 1961 Drag forces in a hydraulic model of a fluidized bed. Part 1. Trans. Instn Chem. Engrs 39, 43.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Y., Morikawa, Y. & Terashima, K. 1982 Fluid-dynamic interaction between two spheres. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 8, 7178.Google Scholar
Verloop, J. & Heertjes, P. M. 1970 Shock waves as a criterion of the transition from homogeneous to heterogeneous fluidization. Chem. Engng Sci. 25, 825.Google Scholar
Volpicelli, G., Massimilla, L. & Zenz, F. S. 1966 Nonhomogeneities in solid-liquid fluidization. Chem. Engng Symp. Ser. no. 62, 67 and 42.
Wallis, G. B. 1962 A simplified one-dimensional representation of two-component vertical flow and its applications to batch sedimentation. Symp. Interact. Fluids and Particles, London, vol. 9.
Wilhelm, R. H. & Kwauk, M. 1948 Fluidization of solid particles. Chem. Engng Prog. 44, 201.Google Scholar