Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T03:29:06.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The shearless turbulence mixing layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. Veeravalli  and
Z. Warhaft
S. Veeravalli
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Z. Warhaft
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction of two energy-containing turbulence scales is studied in the absence of mean shear. The flow, a turbulence mixing layer, is formed in decaying grid turbulence in which there are two distinct scales, one on either side of the stream. This is achieved using a composite grid with a larger mesh spacing on one side of the grid than the other. The solidity of the grid, and thus the mean velocity, is kept constant across the entire flow. Since there is no mean shear there is no turbulence production and thus spreading is caused solely by the fluctuating pressure and velocity fields. Two different types of grids were used: a parallel bar grid and a perforated plate. The mesh spacing ratio was varied from 3.3:1 to 8.9:1 for the bar grid, producing a turbulence lengthscale ratio of 2.4:1 and 4.3:1 for two different experiments. For the perforated plate the mesh ratio was 3:1 producing a turbulence lengthscale ratio of 2.2:1. Cross-stream profiles of the velocity variance and spectra indicate that for the large lengthscale ratio (4.3:1) experiment, a single scale dominates the flow while for the smaller lengthscale ratio experiments, the energetics are controlled by both lengthscales on either side of the flow. In all cases the mixing layer is strongly intermittent and the transverse velocity fluctuations have large skewness. The downstream data of the second, third and fourth moments for all experiments collapse well using a single composite lengthscale. The component turbulent energy budgets show the importance of the triple moment transport and pressure terms within the layer and the dominance of advection and dissipation on the outer edge. It is also shown that the bar grids tend toward self-similarity with downstream distance. The perforated plate could not be measured to the same downstream extent and did not reach self-similarity within its measurement range. In other respects the two types of grids yielded qualitatively similar results. Finally, we emphasize the distinction between intermittent turbulent penetration and turbulent diffusion and show that both play an important role in the spreading of the mixing layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 207 , October 1989 , pp. 191 - 229
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Bradshaw, P. 1971 An Introduction to Turbulence and its Measurement, Pergamon.
Breidenthal, R. E. 1981 Structure in turbulent mixing layers and wakes using a chemical reaction. J. Fluid Mech. 109, 1–24.Google Scholar
Champagne, F. H. & Sleicher, C. A. 1967 Turbulence measurements with inclined hot-wires. Part 2. Hot-wire response equations. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 177–182.Google Scholar
Champagne, F. H., Sleicher, C. A. & Wehrman, O. H. 1967 Turbulence measurements with inclined hot-wires. Part 1. Heat transfer experiments with inclined hot-wire. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 153–176.Google Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1966 The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 657–682.Google Scholar
Corrsin, S. 1950 Hypothesis for skewness of the probability density of the lateral velocity fluctuations in turbulent shear flow. J. Aeronaut. Sci., 17, 396–398.Google Scholar
Gilbert, B. 1976 An experimental investigation of turbulent mixing of fluids with different dynamically significant scales. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago circle.
Gilbert, B. 1980 Diffusion mixing in grid turbulence without mean shear. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 349–365.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. 1985 Some contributions of two-point closure to turbulence. In Frontiers in Fluid Mechanics (ed. S. H. Davis & J. L. Lumley), pp. 68–87. Springer.
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Itsweire, E. C. & Van Atta, C. W. 1984 An experimental study of the response of nearly isotropic turbulence to a spectrally local disturbance. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 423–445.Google Scholar
Kellog, R. M. & Corrsin, S. 1980 Evolution of a spectrally local disturbance in grid-generated, nearly isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 641–669.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. R. 1987 The velocity skewness measured in grid turbulence. Phys. Fluids 30, 935–938.Google Scholar
Orlandi, P. & Crocco, L. 1985 Interaction between isotropic turbulent fields of different scales. Fifth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Cornell University, pp. 2.19–2.25.
Phillips, O. M. 1972 The entrainment interface. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 97–118.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. & Haworth, D. C. 1987 The mixing layer between turbulent fields of different scales. In Turbulent Shear Flows 5 (ed. L. T. S. Bradbury et al.), pp. 44–53. Springer.
Rodi, W. & Scheuerer, G. 1985 Calculation of turbulent boundary layers under the effect of free stream turbulence. Fifth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Cornell University, pp. 15.1–15.5.
Sirivat, A. & Warhaft, Z. 1983 The effect of a passive cross-stream temperature gradient on the evolution of temperature variance and heat flux in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 232–346.Google Scholar
Tennekes, M. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The structure of turbulent shear flows. Cambridge University Press.
Veeravalli, S. & Warhaft, Z. 1987 The interaction of two distinct turbulent velocity scales in the absence of mean shear. In Turbulent Shear Flows 5 (ed. L. T. S. Bradbury et al.), pp. 31–43. Springer (referred to as V & W).
Warhaft, Z. 1981 The use of dual heat injection to infer scalar covariance decay in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 104, 93–109.Google Scholar
Warhaft, Z. 1984 The interference of thermal fields from line sources in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 363–387.Google Scholar