Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:49:18.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Edmundo O'Gorman, Mexican National History and the ‘Great American Dichotomy’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2004

CHARLES A. HALE
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Iowa.

Abstract

Over a period of half a century, from the 1940s to the 1990s, Edmundo O'Gorman came to occupy a unique place in Mexican historiography. Though he might be considered as quasi-aristocratic in his thought and in his bearing, he spent his entire career as teacher and scholar at the popular Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), not at the more elitist El Colegio de México. Unlike Daniel Cosío Villegas, with whom he is often paired as the leading Mexican historians of their generation, he was not politically engaged, nor was he a ‘cultural caudillo’; he appeared to shun the attractions of academic administration and power. He was, however, an avid intellectual organiser and provocateur, who relished debate and welcomed polemical interchanges with colleagues at home and abroad.

Type
Commentary
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This commentary is a revised version of an essay previously published in Spanish as ‘Edmundo O'Gorman y la historia nacional,’ in Signos históricos, no. 3 (June 2000), pp. 11–28. The author is grateful to Josefina Z. Vázquez for her critical reflections on portions of this work and to Nicola Miller for her general encouragement.