Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T18:17:15.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two approaches to the analysis of tags

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rodney Huddleston
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane 4067

Extract

In recent literature on transformational grammar there has been a good deal of discussion of tag sentences (Klima, 1964; Katz and Postal, 1964; Bolinger, 1967; Arbini, 1969). The type of construction under consideration is exemplified in the following (incomplete) paradigm: (1) John has gone, hasn't he? (2) John hasn't gone, has he? (3) John has gone, has he (?) (4) John hasn't gone, hasn't he (?) (5) Come early, won't you (?) (6) Come early, will you (?)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arbini, R. (1969). Tag-questions and tag-imperatives in English. JL 5. 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1957). Interrogative Structures of American English. Alabama: University Press (Publications of the American Dialect Society).Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1967). Imperatives in English. In To Honour Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1940). A Modem English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part five. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.) The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1966). Review of J. J. Katz and P. M. Postal: An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. JL 2. 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar