Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T12:22:23.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

More on the difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Robert D. Borsley
Affiliation:
Linguistics SectionUniversity of Wales, BangorGwynedd LL57 2DG, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. A. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fabb, N. (1990). The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. JL 26. 5777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J. & Napoli, D. J. (1990). A condition on circular chains: a restatement of i-within-i. JL 26. 403424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworska, E. (1986). Prepositional phrases as subjects and objects. JL 22. 355374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, J. (1978). Why subject sentences don't exist. In Keyser, S. J. (ed.) Recent transformational studies in European languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 5364.Google Scholar
May, R. (1985). Logical form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1980). Predication. LIn 11. 203238.Google Scholar