Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T17:57:05.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strepsidura ficus (Gabb) of Harris (1895), Eocene of Texas: a volutid gastropod species distinct from Whitneya ficus Gabb, 1864, Eocene of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Charles R. Givens
Affiliation:
Earth Science Department, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70310
Christopher L. Garvie
Affiliation:
P.O. Box 80189, Austin, Texas 78727-0189

Abstract

Morphometric analysis demonstrates that Strepsidura ficus (Gabb) of Harris (1895), from the lower middle Eocene Reklaw and Queen City Formations of Texas, is specifically distinct from Whitneya ficus Gabb (1864) of the Californian Eocene. Accordingly, the new name Strepsidura harrisi is proposed for the Texas species. Strepsidura s.s. is represented in North America by S. ficus (Gabb), S. harrisi n. sp., and an unnamed species closely related to S. harrisi in the upper Paleocene Sequin Formation of Texas. Strepsidura s.s. apparently originated in the Old World Tethyan Realm during the Paleocene and subsequently spread to North America.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adegoke, O. S. 1977. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Ewekoro Formation (Paleocene) of southwestern Nigeria. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 71:1379.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1895. New or little known Tertiary Mollusca from Alabama and Texas. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1:130.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1833. Fossil Shells of the Tertiary Formations of North America, illustrated by figures drawn on stone by T. A. Conrad. Volume 1, no. 3, p. 2938. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1901. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée. Volume 4, 293 p. Privately published, Paris.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M., and Pissarro, G. 1909. The Mollusca of the Ranikot Series. Part I. Cephalopoda and Gastropoda. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, Volume 3, Memoir 1, 83 p.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1930. The fossil fauna of the Samana Range and some neighbouring areas. Part 8. The Mollusca of the Hangu Shales. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, 15:129222.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau Elémentaire d'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. Privately published, Paris, 710 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. 1971. Tertiary Faunas. Volume 1: The Composition of Tertiary Faunas. Revised and updated by Eames, F. E.George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, 571 p.Google Scholar
Demeré, T. A., Sundberg, F. A., and Schram, F. R. 1979. Paleoecology of a protected biotope from the Eocene Mission Valley Formation, San Diego County, California, p. 97102. In Abbott, P. L. (ed.), Eocene Depositional Systems, San Diego, California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Field Trip Guide, Geological Society of America Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Dickerson, R. E. 1915. Fauna of the type Tejon: its relation to the Cowlitz phase of the Tejon Group of Washington. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, Series 4, 5:3398.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils, p. 55243. In Meek, F. B. and Gabb, W. M. (eds.), Palaeontology of California, Geological Survey of California, Volume 1, Palaeontology. Caxton Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1974. Eocene molluscan biostratigraphy of the Pine Mountain area, Ventura County, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 109:1107.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1895. New and otherwise interesting Tertiary Mollusca from Texas. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1895, 47:4488.Google Scholar
Heilprin, A. 1891. The Eocene Mollusca of the state of Texas. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1890, 42:393406.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, R. L., Garvie, C. L., and , A. W. H. 1992. Eocene euthecosomatous Pteropoda (Gastropoda) of the Gulf and Eastern coasts of North America. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 103:162.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M., and Bentson, H. 1944. Check list of California Tertiary marine Mollusca. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 56:1280.Google Scholar
Kleinpell, R. M., and Weaver, D. W. 1963. Oligocene biostratigraphy of the Santa Barbara embayment, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 43:1250.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1815-1822. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebrés. 7 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Malfait, B. T., and Dinkelman, M. G. 1972. Circum-Caribbean tectonic and igneous activity and the evolution of the Caribbean Plate. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83:251272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. 1931. Mollusken aus dem Obereocan von Nanggulan. Dienst Mijnbouw Nederlandsch-Indie, Wetenschappen Mededeelingen 18, 56 p.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P. 1915. Die eocane Invertebraten-Fauna des Kalksteins in Togo. Beitrago zur geologische Endforschung der Deutschen Schutzgebiche, 12:1126.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1937. The Claibornian Scaphopoda, Gastropoda, and dibranchiate Cephalopoda of the southern United States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 7, Pt. 1, 548 p., Pt. 2, 90 pls.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W., and Brann, D. C. 1966. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the southern and eastern United States. Part II: Gastropoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48:4711057.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature; ou, Tableau de l'Universe et des Corps Organisés. Privately published, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Solander, D. C. 1766. Description of species, p. 143. In Brander, G. (ed.), Fossilia Hantoniensia Collecta, et in Museo Britannico Deposita. London.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1984. Megapaleontology of the Eocene Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science, no. 350, 76 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1987. Eocene molluscan paleontology of the Whitaker Peak Area, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science, 388, 93 p.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1989. A new pseudolivine gastropod genus from the Lower Tertiary of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 63:3847.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1940. New Eocene brachiopods from the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain and Tertiary nautiloids from the Gulf Coastal Plain. University of Texas Publication, 3945:7717941.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B., Krause, E. K., and Twining, J. T. 1957. Pelecypoda from the type locality of the Stone City Beds (Middle Eocene) of Texas. University of Texas Publication, 5704, 237 p.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings, 78:287447.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology; or the natural classification of shells and shellfish. Longman et al., London, 419 p.Google Scholar
Sykes, L. R., McCann, W. R., and Kafka, A. L. 1982. Motion of Caribbean Plate during last 7 million years and implications for earlier Cenozoic movements. Journal of Geophysical Research, 87(B13):10,656-10,676.Google Scholar
Turner, F. E. 1938. Stratigraphy and Mollusca of the Eocene of western Oregon. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 10, 130 p.Google Scholar
Vredenburg, E. W. 1923. Indian Tertiary Gastropoda, No. 5, Fusidae, Turbinellidae, Chrysodomidae, Strepturidae, Buccinidae, Nassidae, Collumbellidae, with short diagnoses of new species. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 55:5277.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938-1944. Gastropoda. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Palaozoologie, Band 6. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1,639 p.Google Scholar