Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T01:38:56.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nafsan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2021

Rosey Billington
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The University of Melbourne & The Australian National University, rosey.billington@anu.edu.au
Nick Thieberger
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The University of Melbourne, thien@unimelb.edu.au
Janet Fletcher
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The University of Melbourne, janetf@unimelb.edu.au

Extract

Nafsan (ISO 639-3: erk, Glottocode: sout2856), also known as South Efate, is a Southern Oceanic language of Vanuatu. It is spoken in Erakor, Eratap and Pango, three villages situated along the southern coast of the island of Efate (Figure 1) (Clark 1985, Lynch 2000, Thieberger 2006). Nafsan is also closely related to Eton, Lelepa, Nakanamanga and Namakura, spoken further to the north on Efate and some smaller neighbouring islands.1 Nafsan is often described as the southernmost member of the North-Central Vanuatu group of languages, and the Nafsan and Eton-speaking communities are noted to be at the core of ‘an unmistakable area of innovation’ compared to their northern neighbours (Clark 1985: 25). Though crosslinguistic comparisons suggest a clear boundary between North-Central Vanuatu languages and languages of the Southern Vanuatu group, there is evidence that Nafsan speakers have both linguistic and cultural links to the southern islands, suggestive of complex historical relationships between the populations of the central and southern regions (Lynch 2004; Thieberger 2007, 2015). In terms of the sound system, Nafsan is noted to be of particular interest because it ‘forms a transition between the phonologically more conservative languages to the north and the more “aberrant” languages to the south’ (Lynch 2000: 320), and exhibits phonotactic patterns which are complex and typologically uncommon, particularly among Oceanic languages (Thieberger 2006).

Type
Illustration of the IPA
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billington, Rosey. 2017. Rosey Billington Nafsan materials (BR1): Digital collection managed by PARADISEC [open access]. http://catalog.paradisec.org.au/collections/BR1.Google Scholar
Billington, Rosey, Fletcher, Janet, Thieberger, Nick & Volchok, Ben. 2018. Acoustic correlates of prominence in Nafsan. In Julien, Epps, Joe, Wolfe, John, Smith & Caroline, Jones (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Australasian International Speech Science and Technology Conference, 137140. Sydney: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Billington, Rosey, Fletcher, Janet, Thieberger, Nick & Volchok, Ben. 2020. Acoustic evidence for right-edge prominence in Nafsan. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147(4), 28292844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billington, Rosey, Thieberger, Nick & Fletcher, Janet. 2020. Phonetic evidence for phonotactic change in Nafsan (South Efate). Italian Journal of Linguistics 32(1), 123148.Google Scholar
Billington, Rosey, Thieberger, Nick & Fletcher, Janet. 2021. Quantity and quality interactions in the phonetic realisation of Nafsan vowels. Ms., ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2007. The prenasalised trills of Manus. In Jeff, Siegel, John, Lynch & Diana, Eades (eds.), Language description, history and development: Linguistic indulgence in memory of Terry Crowley, 297311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ross. 1985. The Efate dialects. Te Reo 28, 335.Google Scholar
Clark, Ross. 2009. *Leo Tuai: A comparative lexical study of North and Central Vanuatu languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1985. Common noun phrase marking in Proto-Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics 24(1/2), 135193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1991. Parallel development and shared innovation: Some developments in Central Vanuatu inflectional morphology. Oceanic Linguistics 30(2), 179222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 2000. The language situation in Vanuatu. Current Issues in Language Planning 1(1), 47132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 2004. Bislama reference grammar. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Janet, Billington, Rosey & Thieberger, Nick. 2019. Prosodic marking of focus in Nafsan. In Sasha, Calhoun, Paola, Escudero, Marija, Tabain & Paul, Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Melbourne, 37873791. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre, Franjieh, Michael, Lacrampe, Sébastien & Schnell, Stefan. 2015a. The exceptional linguistic density of Vanuatu. In François et al. (eds.), 1–21.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre, Franjieh, Michael, Lacrampe, Sébastien & Schnell, Stefan (eds.). 2015b. The languages of Vanuatu: Unity and diversity. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew K. 2016. Phonological typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacrampe, Sébastien. 2014. Lelepa: Topics in the grammar of a Vanuatu language. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lynch, John. 2000. South Efate phonological history. Oceanic Linguistics 39(2), 320338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John. 2001. Article accretion and article creation in Southern Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics 40(2), 224246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John. 2003. Low vowel dissimilation in Vanuatu languages. Oceanic Linguistics 42(2), 359406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John. 2004. The Efate-Erromango problem in Vanuatu subgrouping. Oceanic Linguistics 43(2), 311338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John & Terry, Crowley. 2001. Languages of Vanuatu: A new survey and bibliography. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lynch, John, Ross, Malcolm & Crowley, Terry. 2002. The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of Western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schütz, Albert. 1969. Nguna grammar. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Sperlich, Wolfgang B. 1991. Namakir: A description of a Central Vanuatu language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 1995. South Efate (Vanuatu) (NT1): Digital collection managed by PARADISEC [open access]. http://catalog.paradisec.org.au/collections/NT1.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 2000. South Efate (Vanuatu) (NT5): Digital collection managed by PARADISEC [open access]. http://catalog.paradisec.org.au/collections/NT5.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 2006. A grammar of South Efate: An Oceanic language of Vanuatu. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 2007. The demise of serial verbs in South Efate. In Jeff, Siegel, John, Lynch & Diana, Eades (eds.), Language description, history and development: Linguistic indulgence in memory of Terry Crowley, 237251. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 2011. A South Efate dictionary. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 2012. Mood and transitivity in South Efate. Oceanic Linguistics 51(2), 387401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieberger, Nick. 2015. Walking to Erro: Stories of travel, origins or affection. In François et al. (eds.), 247–263.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrell Trevor. 1976. New Hebrides languages: An internal classification. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Billington et al. supplementary material

Billington et al. supplementary material

Download Billington et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14 MB