Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:22:59.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Escape Responses of Herring Larvae to Visual Stimuli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R.S. Batty
R.S. Batty
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll, PA34 4AD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Predation is now considered the main cause of mortality in larval and juvenile fish (Hunter, 1984) and is therefore the most important factor controlling recruitment to the adult population. Marine fish larvae are prey for many different types of predator including medusae, crustaceans and larger fish. When predatory attacks are sensed both adult and larval fish may respond by making a 'C-start', a very fast, simultaneous contraction of the trunk musculature that deforms the body into a C-shape within 20 ms (Eaton & Hackett, 1984). This startle response is mediated by the Mauthner cells, a pair of prominent neurones in the hind brain or by other reticulo-spinal cells located in the same region. As a result of reciprocal inhibition and decussation of the cell axon, stimulation on one side of the body results in contraction of all the muscle on the contralateral side.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , August 1989 , pp. 647 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, K.M. & Batty, R.S., 1983. A laboratory study of predation by Aurelia aurita on larval herring (Clupea harengus): experimental observations compared with model predictions. Marine Biology, 72, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, K.M. & Batty, R.S., 1984. Laboratory study of predation by Aurelia aurita on larvae of cod, flounder, plaice and herring: development and vulnerability to capture. Marine Biology, 83, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batty, R.S., 1983. Observation of fish larvae in the dark with television and infra-red illumination. Marine Biology, 76, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batty, R.S., 1987. Effect of light intensity on activity and food searching of larval herring, Clupea harengus: a laboratory study. Marine Biology, 94, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S., 1986. Development of sense organs and behaviour of teleost larvae with special reference to feeding and predator avoidance. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 115, 98–114.Google Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S. & Batty, R.S., 1985a. The development of startle responses in herring larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S. & Batty, R.S., 1985b. Herring behaviour in the dark: responses to stationary and continuously vibrating obstacles. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 1031–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S. & Fuiman L.A. 1989. The role of the sensory systems of herring larvae in evading predatory fishes. Rapport et Procès-verbaux du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, in press.Google Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S. & Staines, M., 1970. Pure-cone retinae and retinomotor responses in larval teleosts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, L.M., 1974a. The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio). I. The stimulus for escape. Animal Behaviour, 22, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, L.M., 1974b. The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio). II. The effect of experience. Animal Behaviour, 22, 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, R.C., Bombardieri, R.A. & Meyer, D.L., 1977. The Mauthner-initiated startle response in teleost fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 66, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, R.C. & Hackett, J.T., 1984. The role of the Mauthner cell in fast-starts involving escape in teleost fishes. In Neural Mechanisms of Startle Behavior (ed. R.C., Eaton), pp. 213–266. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuiman, L.A., 1989. Vulnerability of Atlantic herring larvae to predation by yearling herring. Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 51, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galand, G. & Liège, B., 1975. Responses visuelles unitaires chez la truite. In Vision in Fishes (ed. M.A., Ali), pp. 127–135. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J.R., 1984. Inferences regarding predation on the early life stages of cod and other fishes. In The Propagation of Cod Gadus morhua L.(ed. E., Dahlet al.). Flodevigen Rapportser, 1, 533–562.Google Scholar
Möller, H., 1980. Scyphomedusae as predators and food competitors of larval fish. Berichte der Deutschen Wissenschaftlichen Kommission Meeresforschung, 28, 90–100.Google Scholar
Sandy, J.M. & Blaxter, J.H.S., 1980. A study of retinal development in larval herring and sole. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P.W., 1981. Responses of northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax, larvae to predation by a biting planktivore, Amphiprion percula. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States, 79, 727–735.Google Scholar
Webb, P.W., 1982. Avoidance responses of fathead minnow to strikes by four teleost predators. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 147, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, M.C. & Blaxter, J.H.S., 1987. Escape speeds of marine fish larvae during early development and starvation. Marine Biology, 96, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zottoli, S.J., Hordes, A.R. & Faber, D.S., 1987. Localisation of optic tectal input to the ventral dendrite of the goldfish Mauthner cell. Brain Research, 401, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar