Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:33:30.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of feeding levels on the fecundity of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. W. Horwood
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHTM
M. Greer Walker
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHTM
P. Witthames
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHTM

Extract

Previous field studies have recorded yearly variations in fecundity of 40–60% in similar sized plaice, and an experiment was conducted to investigate whether these changes could be generated, in the laboratory, by feeding plaice different levels of ration. One group of plaice was fed at a rate of about 2–2.3% of wet body weight per day, and a second group was fed initially 0.5% and later 1.8% per day. The experiment lasted for a period of 406 days.

Of those fed on the lower ration, 39% produced no granular oocytes, whereas all fish on the higher ration produced granular oocytes. A comparison between the two groups, of those which did produce granular oocytes, found that the better-fed fish had 59% more granular oocytes, but the differences were less pronounced for the smaller, mature fish. Numbers of resting oocytes are also recorded.

The results suggest that food level can significantly affect fecundity, and also revealed a new mechanism for regulation of fecundity in the plaice. The lack of granular oocytes was not due to atresia, but to an early decision not to proceed with gonad development; whether this is of practical significance for the population of plaice in the wild is not yet established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aherne, W.A. & Dunnill, M.S., 1982. Morphometry. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Bagenal, T.B., 1957. The breeding and fecundity of the long rough dab Hippoglossoides platessoides (Fabr.) and the associated cycle in condition. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 339375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T.B., 1963. Variations in plaice fecundity in the Clyde area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 391399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T.B., 1966. The ecological and geographical aspects of the fecundity of the plaice. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46, 161186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T.B., 1971. The inter-relation of the size of fish eggs, the date of spawning and the production cycle. Journal of Fish Biology, 3, 207219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J.R. & Groves, T.D.D., 1979. Physiological energetics. In Fish Physiology, vol. 8 (ed. W.S., Hoar, D.J., Randall and J.R., Brett), pp. 279352. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bromley, P.J., 1974. The Energetics, Nitrogen Metabolism and Growth of Juvenile Sole, Solea solea. PhD Thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
Burton, M.P. & Idler, D.R., 1987 a. The reproductive cycle in winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Walbaum). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 25632567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M.P. & Idler, D.R., 1987 b. An experimental investigation of the nonreproductive postmature state in winter flounder. Pseudopleuronectes americanus Walbaum. Journal of Fish Biology, 30, 643650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B., 1930 a. Growth and maintenance in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Part I. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 17, 103174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B., 1930 b. Growth and maintenance in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Part II. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 17, 877947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B., 1930 c. A statistical study of growth and maintenance in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 17, 949975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, Walker M., Witthames, P.Emerson, L.S. & Walsh, M., 1987. Estimation of fecundity in the Western mackerel stock. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C. M. Papers and Reports), H: 41, 18pp.Google Scholar
Horwood, J.W., Bannister, R.C.A. & Howlett, G.J., 1986. Comparative fecundity of North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B), 228, 401431.Google Scholar
Hunter, J.R. & MacEwicz, B.J., 1985. Rates of atresia in the ovary of captive and wild northern anchovy Engraulis mordax. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States, 83, 119136.Google Scholar
Rijnsdorp, A.D., 1986. On the mechanism of energy allocation over reproduction and somatic growth with particular reference to female plaice. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM. Papers and Reports), L: 9, 17pp.Google Scholar
Simpson, A.C., 1951. The fecundity of the plaice. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ser. 2), 17 (5), 27 pp.Google Scholar
Springate, J.R.C., Bromage, N.R. & Cumaranatunga, P.R.T., 1985. The effects of different ration on fecundity and egg quality in the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). In Nutrition and Feeding in Fish (ed. C.B., Cowey, A.M., Mackie and J.G., Bell), pp. 371394. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, A.V. & Dunn, R.S., 1976. Ration, growth and measures of somatic and organ condition in relation to mean frequency in winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus, with hypotheses regarding population homeostasis. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 33, 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimpenny, R. S., 1953. The Plaice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Witthames, P. R. & Greer, Walker M., 1987. An automated method for counting and sizing fish eggs. Journal of Fish Biology, 30, 225235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar