Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:16:24.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrative Predictions, Old Testament Prophecies and Luke's Sense of Fulfilment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Brigid Curtin Frein
Brigid Curtin Frein
Affiliation:
(Department of Theology/Religious Studies, University of Scranton, Scranton, Pennsylvania 18510, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the publication of Paul Schubert's article, ‘The Structure and Significance of Luke 24’, considerable attention has been paid to what Schubert called Luke's ‘proof-from-prophecy theology’ and what others have identified as the pattern of prophecy/promise and fulfilment. Whatever term is used, it is generally agreed that Luke–Acts presents Jesus' life and the beginning of the church as the fulfilment of God's design for salvation as announced through his prophets. Yet most discussions of this aspect of Luke's theology have focused on Luke's interest in showing that Jesus and the earliest Christians fulfilled OT prophecy, while less attention has been paid to the predictions made in the narrative itself.Even less attention has been paid to the relationship between the fulfilment of OT prophecy and the fulfilment of these narrative predictions. This study will show how the narrative predictions in Luke–Acts contribute to Luke's theology of fulfilment and discuss the ways in which these predictions interface with Luke's emphasis on the fulfilment of OT prophecy.

Type
Articles
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 22 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In Neutestamentliche Studien für Rudolf Bultmann (ed. W. Eltester; Berlin: Töpelman, 1957) 176,178Google Scholar

2 E.g., Dahl, N., ‘The Purpose of Luke–Acts’, Jesus in the Memory of the Early Church (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1976) 89Google Scholar; Drury, J., Tradition and Design in Luke's Gospel (Atlanta: John Knox, 1977) 113Google Scholar; Minear, P., ‘Luke's Use of the Birth Stories’, Studies in Luke–Acts (ed. Keck, L. E., Martyn, J. L.; Nashville: Abingdon, 1966) 119Google Scholar; Talbert, C. H., ‘Promise and Fulfillment in Luke–Acts’, Luke–Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature Seminar (New York: Crossroads, 1984) 91–103.Google Scholar

3 Brawley, R. (Centering on God: Method and Message in Luke–Acts [Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 1990] 59Google Scholar) notes that one of the major plot movements in Luke–Acts is from prediction to fulfilment. Talbert (‘Promise’, 94–5) points out that the prophecy/fulfilment pattern in Luke–Acts consists of much more than the theme of the fulfilment of OT promises, including the fulfilment of predictions made by characters in the narrative.

4 Aune, D., Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983) 103–4Google Scholar; A. Hastings, Prophet and Witness in Jerusalem (Baltimore: Helicon, 1958) 76; Hill, New Testament Prophecy, 17, 36, 58, 60, 64, 98; Meyer, R., Der Prophet aus Galiläa: Studien zum Jesusbild der drei ersten Evangelien (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1970) 42, 104, 112Google Scholar; Schweizer, E., ‘Πνεῦμα’, TDNT 6:381–2.Google Scholar

5 Aune, Prophecy in Early Christianity, 124; Davies, P., ‘Jesus and the Role of the Prophet’, JBL 64 (1945) 245.Google Scholar

6 Talbert, C. H., Reading Luke: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel (New York: Seabury, 1982) 234.Google Scholar

7 Brown, R. E., The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1979) 383Google Scholar; Creed, J. M., The Gospel according to St Luke (London: MacMillan, 1953), 306Google Scholar; Danker, F., Jesus and the New Age: A Commentary on the Third Gospel (St Louis: Clayton, 1972) 16,18.Google Scholar

8 Brawley, Centering, 76.

9 See Gerhardsson, B., The Testing of God's Son (Lund: Gleerup, 1966) 19Google Scholar, who maintains that the temptation narratives in all three synoptic Gospels are primarily about the testing of Jesus as God's son.

10 Contra Neyrey, J., The Passion according to Luke: A Redaction Study of Luke's Soteriology (New York: Paulist, 1985) 13–14Google Scholar; Brawley, Centering, 78.

11 Fitzmyer, J. A., The Gospel according to Luke (Garden City, NT: Doubleday, 1981 and 1985) 1.318–20Google Scholar; Minear, ‘Birth Stories’, 122, 129; idem, To Heal and to Reveal (New York: Seabury, 1976) 93; Sobosan, J., ‘Completion of Prophecy, Jesus in Luke 1:32–33’, BTB 4 (1974) 320Google Scholar; Talbert, Reading Luke, 18.

12 Cullmann, O., The Christology of the New Testament (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1959) 17, 114Google Scholar; Fitzmyer, Luke, 1.327, 338–9; Fuller, R., The Foundation of New Testament Christology (New York: Scribner's, 1965) 48–9Google Scholar; Hahn, F., The Titles of Jesus in Christology (New York: World, 1969) 283, 354–6.Google Scholar

13 See also Sobosan (‘Complete’, 320), who states, ‘Every promise fulfilled “overspills”, so to speak, into a new promise with the possibility of an even greater fulfilment.’

14 Busse, U., Das Nazareth-Manifest Jesu (Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1977) 75–6Google Scholar; Drury, Tradition, 66; L. T. Johnson, The Literary Function of Possessions in Luke–Acts (SBLDS 39; Missoula, MT: Scholars, 1977) 95; Sloan, R., The Favorable Year of the Lord (Austin: Schola, 1977) 70–1.Google Scholar

15 Fitzmyer, Luke, 474.

16 Brown, Schuyler, ‘Water-Baptism and Spirit Baptism in Luke–Acts’, ATR 59 (1977) 141,142.Google Scholar

17 S. Brown, 141.

18 Caird, G. B., Saint Luke (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1963) 86Google Scholar; Johnson, Literary Function, 99; Tiede, D., Prophecy and History in Luke–Acts (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980) 19–20, 47.Google Scholar

19 Schubert, ‘Structure’, 179–80; Tiede, Prophecy and History, 43–4; I. Marshall, H., Luke: Historian and Theologian (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1970) 119–20.Google Scholar

20 Contra Brawley, Centering, 77.

21 Tannehill, R. C., The Narrative Unity of Luke–Acts. A Literary Interpretation 1 (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986) 153.Google Scholar

22 O'Toole, R. F., ‘Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch (Acts 8:25–40)’, JSNT 17 (1983) 33Google Scholar; Tiede, Prophecy and History, 42–3.

23 W. Grundmann, Δεî,Δεονἐστì’, TDNT 2.23.

24 Schubert, ‘The Structure and Significance’, 167–8; Drury, Tradition, 69,117.

25 But cf. Robinson, B. P. (‘The Place of the Emmaus Story in Luke–Acts’, NTS 30 [1984] 482)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, who asserts that ‘24.5–9 reminds us that Jesus himself had prophesied his Passion and Resurrection, and the other two passages (24.13–32 and 24.36–49) stress the notion that these events had been foretold in the OT’. He neglects the close connection between Jesus' prophecies and those of the OT.

26 Caird, Luke, 216; Talbert, Reading Luke, 235.

27 Drury, Tradition, 17.

28 Hastings, Prophet, 138; J. Neyrey, Passion, 87–8; O'Toole, R. F., ‘Luke's Notion of “Be Imitators of Me as I Am of Christ” in Acts 25–26’, BTB (1978 158–9Google Scholar.

29 Talbert, Reading, 235.

30 C. H. Talbert, ‘Promise’, 95.

31 Aune, Prophecy in Early Christianity, 263–4.

32 Kurz, Wm, ‘Narrative Approaches to Luke–Acts’, Biblica 68 (1987) 215Google Scholar; Talbert, ‘Promise’, 94.

33 Talbert, ‘Promise and Fulfillment’, 94–5, 99.

34 Talbert, ‘Promise and Fulfillment’, 99–100; idem, Reading Luke, 234–40.

35 Busse, U., Die Wunder des Propheten Jesus: Die Rezeption, Komposition und Interpretation der Wundertradition im Evangelium des Lukas (FzB 24; Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1979) 380.Google Scholar

36 For extensive discussions of the continuity of salvation and the relationship between Israel and the church, see Jervell, J., Luke and the People of God (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1972) 41–69Google Scholar; O'Toole, R. F., The Unity of Luke's Theology: Analysis of Luke–Acts (Wilmington, Del.: Glazier, 1984) 17–32.Google Scholar