Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T08:55:54.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The bird fleas of Fair Isle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Miriam Rothschild
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Approximately 5000 birds (78 species) were trapped on Fair Isle and examined for fleas. Six species of flea were recorded: D. g. gallinulae (430 records), C. gallinae (205 records), C. borealis (126 records), C. garei (4 records), C. fringillae and C. vagabundus (1 record each).

The infestation rate among spring-passage migrants was 52·2% and among autumn-passage migrants only 2·7%. Spring migrants released and retrapped after ‘de-fleaing’ in the Fair Isle apparatus showed a 55% re-infestation rate. On spring migrants D. g. gallinulae was the dominant flea, but on autumn migrants C. gallinae was dominant. The most heavily infested group of birds were the Turdidae (61% spring, 3% autumn infestation rate) and Sylviidae (53% spring, 1% autumn infestation rate).

A number of double and triple infestations with 2 or 3 species of flea is recorded. Double infestations involving D. g. gallinulae and C. borealis occur more frequently than would be expected for purely chance associations. More male birds (90) than female birds (70) were infested.

The sex ratio of the fleas (on the bodies of birds) was: D. g. gallinulae 294 males, 325 females; C. gallinae 115 males, 214 females; C. borealis 77 males, 77 females. On the spring migrants there was an excess of male D. g. gallinulae and on the autumn migrants an excess of females.

On the resident birds there was definite evidence of host preference. The starling was the chief host of C. gallinae, the pipits of D. g. gallinulae and the wheatear of C. borealis. The re-infestation rate of ‘de-fleaed’ retraps showed a higher rate than original trappings in all cases, but the lack of D. g. gallinulae on retrapped starlings suggested some host selection on the part of the flea.

The proportions of the three principal species of flea found in (i) the nest of the wheatear, and (ii) on the body of the bird were strikingly different.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 48 , Issue 3-4 , November 1958 , pp. 382 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, J. K. (1956). Host selection in bird fleas. British Ecological Society Autumn Meeting. J. Anim. Ecol. 25, 475–6.Google Scholar
Butterfield, W. A. (1952). The nesting of Wheatears in 1952. Fair Isle Bird Obs. Bull. 8, 9–10.Google Scholar
Corbet, G. B. (1956). The life-history and host relations of a hippoboscid fly Ornithomyia fringillina Curtis. J. Anim. Ecol. 25, 403–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagle Clarke, W. (1912). Studies in Bird Migration. 2. London.Google Scholar
Ioff, I. (1941). The ecology of fleas in connection with their epidemiological importance. (In Russian.) Pyatigorsk. Ordzhonik. kraev. Izd. 116 pp., 9 figs., 1 chart.Google Scholar
Jordan, Karl & Rothschild, N. (1910). List of Siphonaptera collected in Portugal. Novit. Zool. 8, 551–4.Google Scholar
Nordberg, Sven (1936). Biologisch-ökologische Untersuchungen über die Vogelnidicolen. Acta zool. fenn. 21, 1–168.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. (1948). Bird fleas collected by Miss Theresa Clay, Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen and Captain W. H. Pollen in the Island of Ushant, Brittany, France, with a note on the distribution of Ceratophyllus borealis by Rothschild (1907). Entomologist, 81, 84–95.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. (1952). A collection of fleas from the bodies of British birds, with notes on their distribution and host preferences. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Ent. 2, 185–232.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. (1955). The distribution of Ceratophyllus borealis Rothschild 1906 and C. garei Rothschild 1902, with records of specimens intermediate between the two. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 107, 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. & Clay, T. (1952). Fleas, Flukes and Cuckoos. (New Naturalist series.) London: Collins.Google Scholar
Smit, F. G. A. M. (1955). Two new subspecies of fleas (Siphonaptera) from the British Isles, with a Discussion on their distribution. (Jointly with Miriam Rothschild.) Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 107, 341–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansfield, G. (1957). The fleas of Skokholm Island. Ent. Mon. Mag. 93, 96–201.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. B. (1954). The parasites of British birds and mammals. XXVII. Some notes on Ceratophyllus borealis Rothschild (1907). Ent. Mon. Mag. 90, 4–9.Google Scholar
Waterston, J. (1910). On some habits and hosts of bird Ceratophylli taken in Scotland in 1909; with description of a new species (C. rothschildi) and records of various Siphonaptera. Proc. R. Phys. Soc. Edinb. 188, 73–91.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1952). Migrational drift in Britain in autumn 1951. Scot. Nat. 64, 1–18.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1953). Migration into Britain from the north-west in autumn 1952. Scot. Nat. 65, 65–94.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1954). The Fair Isle apparatus for collecting bird ectoparasites. Brit. Birds, 47, 234–5.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1957). Fair Isle Bird Obs. Bull. 3, 110–60.Google Scholar