Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T05:57:59.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on tapeworm physiology

XI. In vitro cultivation of Echinococcus granulosus from the protoscolex to the strobilate stage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. D. Smyth
J. D. Smyth
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some factors controlling differentiation of the protoscoleces of Echinococcus into strobilate or cystic stages, in vitro, have been identified. Development in a strobilate direction requires (a) evagination of the scolex, (b) contact of the evaginated scolex with a suitable nutritive substrate. These conditions are satisfied by treating fresh protoscoleces with pepsin and by evaginating them with trypsin + pancreatin + dog bile and subsequently culturing in diphasic media.

The most satisfactory diphasic system so far developed consisted of a base of bovine serum (coagulated by heating) with a liquid phase of Parker 199 medium +20% hydatid fluid and a gas phase of 8% O2+5% CO2 in N2. In this diphasic system, protoscoleces have been cultured to the 3-proglottid strobilate stage with the anlagen of the male and female genitalia formed: the first proglottid appeared after 30 days culture in vitro compared with 16 days in vivo; three proglottids were formed after 60 days. Development in vitro stopped just short of mature egg-producing worms.

That an intimate contact of a ‘placental’ nature takes place between the parasite and the solid proteinaceous base is shown by the fact that strobilization never took place in cultures lacking bases or in those in which the serum base was separated from the protoscoleces by a cellulose membrane. Cytological and ultra-structure studies of an evaginated protoscolex revealed that fully developed microtriches were present only in the rostellar region and not in the post-sucker region. It is concluded that it is this anterior region which makes initial contact with the nutritive substrate—a contact which appears to provide the ‘strobilization stimulus’. It is not known if the ‘strobilization stimulus’ is stimulatory (i.e. nervous) or nutritive or both. Contact with a non-nutritive base (i.e. agar) does not induce strobilization.

In any one sample of protoscoleces, after a high initial evagination, only about 30–40% finally remained evaginated and continued to show sucker activity. The degree of evagination appears to be characteristic for any sample of protoscoleces and may be related to the source of the hydatid cysts. It may prove to be a genetically determined character.

Evaginated protoscoleces became inactive under certain conditions and the degree of activity seems to be related to stimulatory and nutritive factors. The activity of evaginated protoscoleces was used as a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of a culture medium or condition. Evaginated protoscoleces which lost their activity developed small posterior bladders as did the majority of unevaginated protoscoleces. In both cases, posterior bladders enlarged and secreted a PAS-positive layer which formed the laminated membrane of a miniature hydatid cyst.

The well-known appearance of vesicular forms in cultures appears to be related to unfavourable culture conditions in vitro, such as a low or high pH or a low or high O2 tension.

It is pointed out that since the morphogenesis of Echinococcus protoscoleces can now be controlled to a considerable extent in vitro and since the contents of any one cyst have the same genotype, this organism provides exceptionally interesting material for studies on morphogenesis.

Acknowledgement is made to the Australian Wool Board, the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Services Grant No. AI-04707–03 and the World Health Organizati on for generous financial assistance in support of this work.

The skilful technical assistance of Mr A. B. Howkins and Mrs Mary Barton is also acknowledged.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 111 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berntzen, A. K. (1961). The in vitro cultivation of tapeworms. I. Growth of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). J. Parasit. 47, 351–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berntzen, A. K. (1962). In vitro cultivation of tapeworms. II. Growth and maintenance of Hymenolepis nana (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). J. Parasit. 48, 785–97.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1943). Studies on the nutrition of tapeworms. Am. J. Hyg. 37, 121–30.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. A. & Smyth, J. D. (1966). Growth, development and culture methods; parasitic platyhelminthes. In Chemical Zoology, vol. 1. Ed. Scheer, B. T.. New York: Academic Press (in the press).Google Scholar
Gurri, J. (1963). Vitalidad y evolutividad de las escolices hidaticos ‘in vivo’ e ‘in vitro’. An. Fac. Med. Univ. Montevideo 48, 372–81. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Lukashenko, N. P. (1964). Study on the development of Alolococcus multilocularis (Leuckhart, 1863) in vitro. Medit. Parasit. Paray. Colezni 33, 271–78.Google Scholar
Pauluzzi, S., Sorice, F., Castagnari, L. & Serra, P. (1965). Contributo allo studio delle colture in vitro degli scolici di Echinococcus granulosus. Annali Sclavo 7, 191–218.Google Scholar
Read, C. P. & Simmons, J. E. (1963). Biochemistry and physiology of tapeworms. Physiol. Rev. 43, 263–305.Google Scholar
Rycke, P. H. de & Grembergen, G. van. (1965). Étude sur l'evagination de scolex d' Echinococcus granulosus. Z. ParasitKde. 25, 518–25.Google Scholar
Schiller, E. L. (1965). A simplified method for the in vitro cultivation of the rat tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. J. Parasit. 51, 516–18.Google Scholar
Schwabe, C. W., Hadidian, L. & Koussa, M. (1963). Host-parasite relationships in echinococcosis. IX. In vitro survival of hydatid scolices and the effects of drugs upon scolex respiration. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 12, 338–45.Google Scholar
Sergeeva, P. A. & Euranova, V. G. (1962). [Cultivation of the larval form of Echinococcus granulosus in nutrient media and in tissue cultures.] In Russian. Abstr. only. Uchen. Zap. kazan. vet. Inst. 89, 145–50.Google Scholar
Silverman, P. H. (1965). In vitro cultivation of parasitic helminths. Adv. Parasitol. 3, 159–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1962). Studies on tapeworm physiology. X. Axenic cultivation of the hydatid organism, Echinococcus granulosus; establishment of a basic technique. Parasitology 52, 441–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1964). Observations on the scolex of Echinococcus granulosus, with special reference to the occurrence and cytochemistry of secretory cells in the rostellum. Parasitology 54, 515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. & Howkins, A. B. (1966). Studies on tapeworm physiology. XII. A technique for the cultivation of partly developed strobila of Echinococcus granulosus from dogs to maturity in vitro. Parasitilogy 56, 763–66.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., Howkins, A. B. & Barton, M. (1966). Factors controlling the differentiation of the hydatid organism Echinococcus granulosus, into cystic or strobilar stages in vitro. Nature, Lond. 211, 1374–77.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. & Smyth, M. M. (1966). Some aspects of host specificity in the genus Echinococcus. Helminthologia (in the Press).Google Scholar
Webster, G. A. & Cameron, T. W. M. (1963). Some preliminary observations on the development of Echinococcus in vitro. Can. J. Zool. 41, 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, J., Ohbayashi, M. & Kitamura, Y. (1958). Studies on echinococcosis. IX. Differences in development of the tapeworm stage between Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786) and E. multilocularis (Leuckart, 1863). Jap. J. vet. Res. 6, 226–29.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., Ohbayashi, M., Sakamoto, T. & Orihara, M. (1962). Studies on echinococcosis. XIII. Observation on the vesicular development of the scolex of E. multilocularis in vitro. Jap. J. vet. Res 10, 85–96.Google Scholar