Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:57:26.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educational level differences on the Mini-Mental State: the role of test bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

A. F. Jorm ,
R. Scott ,
A. S. Henderson  and
D. W. K. Kay
A. F. Jorm*
Affiliation:
NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and MRC Neuroendocrinology Unit, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
R. Scott
Affiliation:
NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and MRC Neuroendocrinology Unit, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
A. S. Henderson
Affiliation:
NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and MRC Neuroendocrinology Unit, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
D. W. K. Kay
Affiliation:
NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and MRC Neuroendocrinology Unit, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr A. F. Jorm, NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra 2601, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Less educated elderly people are commonly found to perform more poorly on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). This educational level difference has been attributed by some research workers to test bias. To assess whether the MMSE is biased against the poorly educated, its validity was assessed separately in the more- and less-educated members of a community sample. No evidence was found to indicate that the test is a biased measure of cognitive impairment.

Type
Brief Communication
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 1988 , pp. 727 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, J. C, Niaz, U., LeResche, L. A., Von Korff, M. R. & Folstein, M. F. (1982). Limits of the ‘Mini-Mental State’ as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychological Medicine 12, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkman, L. F. (1986). The association between educational attainment and mental status examinations: of etiologic significance for senile dementias or not? Journal of Chronic Diseases 39, 171–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar, J. I., Burnam, A., Karno, M., Forsythe, A., Landsverk, J. & Golding, J. M. (1986). Use of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in a community population of mixed ethnicity: cultural and linguistic artifacts. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 174, 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1975). ‘Mini-Mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurland, B. J. (1981). The borderlands of dementia: the influence of sociocultural characteristics on rates of dementia occurring in the serium. In Clinical Aspects of Alzheimer's Disease and Senile Dementia (Aging, Vol. 15) (ed. Miller, N. E. and Cohen, G. D.), pp. 61–84. Raven Press: New York.Google Scholar
Holzer, C. E., Tischler, G. L., Leaf, P. J. & Myers, J. K. (1984). An epidemiologic assessment of cognitive impairment in a community population. Research in Community and Mental Health 4, 3–32.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. Methuen: London.Google Scholar
Kay, D. W. K., Henderson, A. S., Scott, R., Wilson, J., Rickwood, D. & Grayson, D. A. (1985). Dementia and depression among the elderly living in the Hobart community: the effect of the diagnostic criteria on the prevalence rates. Psychological Medicine 15, 771–788.Google ScholarPubMed
Kittner, S. J., White, L. R., Farmer, M. E., Wolz, M., Kaplan, E., Moes, E., Brody, J. A. & Feinleib, M. (1986). Methodological issues in screening for dementia: the problem of education and adjustment. Journal of Chronic Diseases 39, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, J. K., Weissman, M. M., Tischler, G. L., Holzer, C. E., Leaf, P. J., Orvashel, H., Anthony, J. C., Boyd, J. H., Burke, J. D., Kramer, M. & Stoltzman, R. (1984). Six-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders in three communities. Archives of General Psychiatry 41, 959–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C. R. (1982) Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. In Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias (ed. Berk, R. A.), pp. 199–227. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and LondonGoogle Scholar