Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T20:57:12.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light Requirement of the Diphenylether Herbicide Oxyfluorfen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. E. Vanstone  and
E. H. Stobbe
D. E. Vanstone
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Morden, Manitoba, Canada R0G 1J0, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada R3T 2N2
E. H. Stobbe
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Morden, Manitoba, Canada R0G 1J0, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicidal activity of foliar-applied oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene] was light dependent in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. ‘Tokyo’). Plants were not injured when placed in the dark for as long as 4 days after herbicide treatment. When these plants were brought to the light, injury occurred, albeit more slowly than when plants were placed in the light immediately after treatment. The rate of injury increased as light intensity increased. The most effective wave length was 565 to 615 ηm, suggesting the involvement of a pigment with its absorption spectrum in this region. Chlorophyll content was not reduced by oxyfluorfen. Preliminary evidence suggests that photosynthesis was affected only after membrane integrity was disrupted.

Keywords

Fagopyrum esculentumchlorophyllphotosynthesis
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 88 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Fadayomi, Omosuyi and Warren, G. F. 1976. The light requirement for herbicidal activity of diphenyl ethers. Weed Sci. 24:598–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Matsunaka, S. 1969. Acceptor of light energy in photoactivation of diphenylether herbicides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17:171–175.Google Scholar
3. Matsunaka, S. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1974. Light-herbicide interaction: a new mode of action. Nat. Inst. Agric. Sci., Konosu, Saitama, Japan.Google Scholar
4. Sastak, Z., Catsky, J. and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Plant photosynthetic production-manual of methods. Dr. W. Junk. N. V. Publishers, The Hague, pp. 676–681.Google Scholar
5. Stoeckenius, Walther. 1976. The purple membrane of salt-loving bacteria. Sci. Am. 234(6):38–46.Google Scholar
6. Vanstone, D. E. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Electrolytic conductivity-a rapid measure of herbicide injury. Weed Sci. 25:352–354.Google Scholar