Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T12:30:10.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption, Desorption, and Mobility of Metolachlor in Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. Obrigawitch ,
F. M. Hons ,
J. R. Abernathy  and
J. R. Gipson
T. Obrigawitch
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409
F. M. Hons
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409
J. R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
J. R. Gipson
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] has considerable potential for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) control in crops commonly produced in the Texas High Plains. Little information is available, however, concerning adsorption characteristics of metolachlor in soils of this region. Adsorption and movement of metolachlor were determined in three commonly occurring soils of the Texas High Plains. Organic carbon contents of the soils by weight varied from 0.3 to 0.5%, and the clay fraction ranged from 16 to 33%. Freundlich adsorption isotherms exhibited two linear regions for each soil, suggesting the possibility of multilayer adsorption. K′oc values and coefficients of determination for organic carbon and clay content vs. Freundlich K values indicated that organic matter was the predominant adsorbent for metolachlor in the soils studied. Desorption, soil column leaching, and thin-layer plate studies demonstrated metolachlor to be sufficiently mobile in scils low in organic matter to cause possible crop injury or loss of efficacy.

Keywords

Soilherbicideleachabilityacetanilide
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 1981 , pp. 332 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Davidson, J. M. 1971. Effect of calcium chloride on prometryne and fluometuron adsorption in soil. Weed Sci. 19:517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hamaker, J. W. and Thompson, J. M. 1972. Adsorption. Pages 49–143 in Goring, C. A. I. and Hamaker, J. W., eds. Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. Harter, R. D. and Baker, D. E. 1977. Application and misapplication of the Langmuir equation to soil adsorption phenomena. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41:1077–1080.Google Scholar
4. McGlamery, M.D. and Slife, F. W. 1966. The adsorption and desorption of atrazine as affected by pH, temperature, and concentration. Weeds 14:237–239.Google Scholar
5. Rahman, A. and Matthews, L. J. 1979. Effect of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of thirteen s-triazine herbicides. Weed Sci. 25:158–161.Google Scholar
6. Timmons, F. D. and Coble, H. D. 1972. Performance of two acetanilide herbicides in organic soil in North Carolina. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:446–451.Google Scholar
7. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10: 9–14.Google Scholar
8. Wu, C., Buehring, N., Davidson, J. M., and Santelmann, P. W. 1975. Napropamide adsorption, desorption, and movement in soils. Weed Sci. 23:454–457.Google Scholar