Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:43:33.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beveridge, Workmen's Compensation and the Alternative Remedy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

P.W.J. Bartrip
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The passing of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 did not affect an injured worker's rights to sue for damages at common law or under the Employers' Liability Act 1880. However, the evidence suggests that these alternative remedies declined in importance until the 1930s when certain court decisions and acts of Parliament gave them renewed significance. For several reasons Beveridge was antipathetic towards unmodified retention of the alternative remedy, but he proposed the establishment of an official committee for the purpose of making a full inquiry. As a result, the Home Secretary, Herbert Morrison, appointed the Monckton Committee on Alternative Remedies. The Committee's majority report largely endorsed the TUC's viewpoint in recommending maintenance of the alternative remedy. Subsequent legislation, the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act, permitted reduction of damages where industrial injuries benefit was secured; otherwise injured workers' rights to sue were perpetuated, albeit with questionable results. Down to the present day the costly alternative remedy survives, despite lack of evidence that it achieves either of its supposed objectives, namely, the compensation of personal injury victims or the deterrence of carelessness.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 1985 , pp. 491 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addison, P. (1975), The Road to 1945: British Politics and the Second World War, Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Auld, R.E. (1963), Compensation for Industrial Accidents, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Bartrip, P.W.J. and Burman, S.B. (1983), The Wounded Soldiers of Industry, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Beveridge Papers (1942a), Memorandum on Industrial Accidents and Disease, BP VIII 32, British Library of Political and Economic Science, London.Google Scholar
Beveridge Papers (1942b), Memorandum on Workmen's Compensation: Present Position, BP VIII 32, British Library of Political and Economic Science, London.Google Scholar
Beveridge Papers (1942c), Social Insurance Committee: Minutes of Nineteenth Meeting, BP VIII 26, British library of Political and Economic Science, London.Google Scholar
Calder, A. (1969), The People's War, Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1948), ‘Workmen's compensation’, in Robson, W.A. (ed.), Social Security, Fabian Society, London, pp.61–87.Google Scholar
Cmd 6404 (1942–1943), Social Insurance and Allied Services (Beveridge Report), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmd 6580 (1944–1945), First Interim Report of the Departmental Committee on Alternative Remedies, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmd 6642 (1944–1945), Second Interim Report of the Departmental Committee on Alternative Remedies, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmd 6860 (1945–1946), Final Report of the Departmental Committee on Alternative Remedies, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 3691 (1967–1968), Committee on Personal Injuries Litigation (Winn Report), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 7054–1 (1978), Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury (Pearson Report), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1980), Industrial Injuries Compensation: A Discussion Document, DHSS, London.Google Scholar
Dinsdale, W.A. (1954), History of Accident Insurance in Great Britain, Stone and Cox, London.Google Scholar
Harris, D.R., Maclean, M., Green, H., Lloyd-Bostock, S., Fenn, P., Corfield, P. and Brittan, Y. (1984), Compensation and Support for Illness and Injury, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1977), William Beveridge: A Biography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lister, T.F. (1915), ‘The Workmen's Compensation Act 1906: Its amendment and relation to national insurance’, Journal of Chartered Insurance Institute, Vol. 18, 61–79.Google Scholar
Morgan, K.O. (1984), Labour in Power 1945–51, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Munkman, J.H. (1950), Employer's Liability at Common Law, Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Parsons, O.H. (1946), ‘The Monckton Report on Alternative Remedies’, Industrial Law Review, Vol. 1, 131–5.Google Scholar
Parry, E.A. (1914), The Law and the Poor, Smith, Elder and Co., London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1943a), Meeting of the Committee on Reconstruction Problems, 7 04 1943, PIN 12/94, PRO, London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1943b), Sir Hector Hetherington to Herbert Morrison, 6 12 1943, PIN 12/85, PRO. London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1944a), Home Office Evidence to the Departmental Committee on Alternative Remedies, Supplementary note dated 16 08 1944, annex b to paper 5, PIN 12/85, PRO, London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1944b), Viscount Simon to Home Office, 12 01 1944, PIN 12/85, PRO, London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1944c), Viscount Simon to Herbert Morrison, 19 01 1944, PIN 12/85, PRO, London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1944d), Home Office Minute, 15 03 1944, PIN 12/85, PRO, London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1944e), BEC Evidence to the Departmental Committee on Alternative Remedies, PIN 12/85. PRO, London.Google Scholar
Public Records Office (1944f). Evidence of Organizations to the Departmental Committee on Alternative Remedies, PIN 12/85, PRO, London.Google Scholar
Robson, W.A. and Gold, J. (1937), ‘Common employment: Reflection in the light of Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co. Ltd v. English’, Modern Law Review, Vol. 1. 224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell-Jones, A. (1944), ‘Workmen's compensation, common law remedies and the Beveridge Report’, Modern Law Review, Vol. 7, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Hon. Justice(1962), ‘The development of the action for personal injury’, An address delivered before the Bentham Club by its President, in Keeton, G.W. and Schwarzenberger, G. (eds), Current Legal Problems, Vol. 15, Stevens and Sons, London, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress (1943), Joint Social Insurance and Workmen's Compensation and Factories Committee: Minutes of Meeting of 7 January, TUC JSI & WC and FC 3/1, Box 1248, TUC, London.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress (1946), Report of Proceedings at the Seventy-Eighth Annual Congress, TUC, London.Google Scholar
Unger, J. (1938). ‘Common employment: Reflections on two recent cases’. Modern Law Review. Vol. 2, 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.L. (1960), Accidents and III Health at Work, Staples, London.Google Scholar
Warwick Modern Record Centre (1942a), Home Office to BEC, 18 03 1942, Mss 200/B/3/2/C4 pt. 103, NC 7323, WMRC, Warwick.Google Scholar
Warwick Modern Record Centre (1942b), BEC Annual Report, 1941–2, Mss 200/B/3/2/C4 pt. 104, NC 7440, WMRC, Warwick.Google Scholar
Young, A.F. (1964), Industrial Injuries Insurance, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar