Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T04:50:19.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delayed recovery and the spacing of major extinctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Steven M. Stanley
Steven M. Stanley*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Approximate periodicity for peak rates of global extinction during the past 250 m.y. may have resulted from delayed recovery following major extinction events. Two components can be envisioned for such delays: persistence of inimical environmental conditions for some time after the onset of the crisis, and slow restoration of vulnerable taxa. This general hypothesis is consistent with statistical evidence of linkage between measured rates of extinction of marine invertebrate genera for contiguous stages and substages of the geologic column. The nine broad valleys between the “periodic” peak rates for the past 250 m.y. exhibit only three trivial secondary peaks, indicating that, if the pattern is not artifactual, trends in global rates of extinction have not readily been abruptly reversed. Moreover, the smooth observed trends reflect the fact that regional crises tend to remove many species but few genera. To some degree, high rates of extinction that precede peak rates must represent bias of the incomplete fossil record (the Signor-Lipps effect). High rates that immediately follow peak rates also may, to a degree, reflect biological legacy: (1) final extinction of weakened genera or (2) extinction of new genera that contain few species or represent failed evolutionary “experiments.” Nonetheless, there is evidence that protracted intervals of stressful environmental conditions contributed to high rates of extinction preceding or following certain peak intervals, including the Scythian, Cenomanian, Early Paleocene, and Early Oligocene. The reef-building rudists, for example, suffered heavy extinction during both Cenomanian and Turonian time and then failed to recover quickly.

The late Neogene record of bivalve molluscs in the Western Atlantic offers a more detailed picture of delayed recovery. Here early intervals of glacial expansion caused heavy extinction, leaving an impoverished, eurythermal fauna that was virtually unaffected by late Pleistocene glacial episodes. The episode of heavy extinction in Late Eocene time exhibits a similar phenomenon on a worldwide scale. Among the planktonic foraminifera, warm-adapted stenothermal species died out, and eurythermal forms predominated throughout Oligocene time; restoration of vulnerable, stenothermal species proceeded gradually during the Miocene Epoch. This example of delayed recovery and others like it following earlier global crises may have prevented such crises from following one another in rapid succession, yielding an appearance of periodicity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , Fall 1990 , pp. 401 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Addicott, W. O. 1966. Late Pleistocene marine paleoecology and zoogeography in central California. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 523-C.Google Scholar
Anstey, R. L. 1978. Taxonomic survivorship and morphologic complexity in Paleozoic bryozoan genera. Paleobiology 4:407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubry, M.-P. 1983. Late Eocene and Early Oligocene calcareous nannoplankton—biostratigraphy and biogeography. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 67:415.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1975. The origin of the psychrosphere as recorded in changes of deep-sea ostracode assemblages. Lethaia 8:69–83.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1989. Late Paleogene time-scale: an update. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 21:A88.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Flynn, J. J., and Van Couvering, J. A. 1985. Cenozoic geochronology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 96:1407–1418.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cifelli, R. 1969. Radiation of Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera. Systematic Zoology 18:154–168.Google Scholar
Collinson, M. E., Fowler, K., and Boulter, M. C. 1981. Floristic changes indicate a cooling climate in the Eocene of southern England. Nature 291:315–317.Google Scholar
Cronin, T. M., and Dowsett, H. J. 1990. A quantitative micro-paleontologic method for shallow marine paleoclimatology: application to Pliocene deposits of the western North Atlantic Ocean. Marine Micropaleontology (in press).Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. 1986. Punctuated succession of Paleogene mollusks in the northern Gulf Coastal Plain. Palaios 1:582–589.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1989. Regional paleoecology of Permian gastropod genera, southwestern United States and the end-Permian mass extinction. Palaios 4:424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. G., and Arthur, M. A. 1977. Secular variations in the pelagic realm. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 25:19–50.Google Scholar
Flügel, E., and Stanley, G. D. 1984. Reorganization, development, and evolution of post-Permian reefs and reef organisms. Palaeontographica Americana 54:177–186.Google Scholar
Gobbett, D. J. 1973. Permian Fusulinacea. Pp. 152–158. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Atlas of Paleobiogeography. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1986. The Pliensbachian and Tithonian extinction events. Nature 319:765–768.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. A. 1987. Extinction of Late Eocene to Oligocene molluscs: relationship to shelf area, temperature changes, and impact events. Palaios 2:69–75.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. A. 1988. Early Tertiary radiation of marine molluscs and the long-term effects of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Paleobiology 14:37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llwellyn, P. G., Pickton, C. A. G., Smith, A. G., and Walters, R. 1982. A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hart, M. B. 1990. Major evolutionary radiations of the planktonic Foraminiferida. In Larwood, G. P., and Taylor, P. D. (eds.), Major Evolutionary Radiations. Systematics Association Special Volume (in press).Google Scholar
Hazel, J. E. 1971. Paleoclimatology of the Yorktown Formation (Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene) of Virginia and North Carolina: Centre de Récherches SNPA, Pau Bulletin 5 (Supplement):361–375.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. 1980. Paleogene marine gastropods of the Keasey Formation of Oregon. Bulletins of American Paleontology 78:1–112.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1986. Background and mass extinctions: the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science 231:129–133.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. C., and Kauffman, E. G. 1990. Originations, radiations and extinctions of Cretaceous rudist bivalve species in the Caribbean Province. Pp. 205–324. In Kaufmann, E. G., and Walliser, O. (eds.), Extinction Events in Earth History. Springer-Verlag; Berlin.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S., and Nicol, D. 1986. Origination, survivorship and extinction of rudist taxa. Journal of Paleontology 60:107–115.Google Scholar
Keller, G. 1986. Stepwise mass extinctions and impact events: Late Eocene to Early Oligocene. Marine Micropaleontology 10:267–293.Google Scholar
Keller, G., and MacLeod, N. 1989. Late Eocene-Early Oligocene faunal turnover in planktonic foraminifera. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 21:A87.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1977. Cenozoic evolution of Antarctic glaciation, the Circum-Antarctic Ocean, and their impact on global paleoceanography. Journal of Geophysical Research 82:3843–3859.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. P., and Shackleton, N. J. 1976. Oxygen isotopic evidence for the development of the psychrosphere 38 Myr. ago. Nature 260:513–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J. P., and Srinivasan, M. S. 1983. Neogene Planktonic Foraminifera. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company; Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. P., and von der Borch, C. C. 1986. Southwest Pacific Cenozoic Paleoceanography. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 90:1493–1517.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A., and Pena, D. 1984. Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past: deterministic versus stochastic explanations. Science 226:689–692.Google Scholar
Kummel, B. 1972. The Lower Triassic (Scythian) ammonoid Otoceras. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 143:365–417.Google Scholar
Kummel, B. 1973. Lower Triassic (Scythian) Molluscs. Pp. 225–233. In Hallam, A. (ed.) Atlas of Palaeobiogeography. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1971. The Age of Mammals. Columbia University Press; New York.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1989. Periodic mass extinctions: product of biosphere growth dynamics? Historical Biology 2:273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1961. Mollusks of the tropical eastern Pacific. Panamic Pacific Pelecypoda. Paleontological Research Institution; Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Petuch, E. J. 1982. Geographical heterochrony: contemporaneous co-existence of Neogene and Recent molluscan faunas in the Americas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 37:277–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnick, R. E., and McKinney, M. L. 1989. Ecosystem dynamics and periodic extinctions. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 21:A207–A208.Google Scholar
Pomerol, C. 1982. The Cenozoic Era. Ellis Horwood Limited; Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 1985. Mid-Oligocene extinction event in North American land mammals. Science 229:550–551.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 1986. North American mammalian diversity and Eocene-Oligocene extinctions. Paleobiology 11:389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R., and Swisher, C. 1989. New Ar/Ar dates and revised magnetostratigraphy of the Chadronian through Arikareean land mammal ages. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 21:A89.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. F. 1983. Mass extinctions in the fossil record. Science 219:1239–1240.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215:1501–1503.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. 1984. Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 81:801–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M., Sepkoski, J. J., and Stigler, S. M. 1983. Mass extinctions in the fossil record (response). Science 219:1240–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, C. A., and Ross, J. R. P. 1982. Biogeographic influences on late Palaeozoic faunal distributions. Pp. 199–212. In Larwood, G. P., and Nielsen, E. (eds.), Recent and Fossil Bryozoa. Olsen and Olsen; Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. B., Beaudry, F. M., Hay, W. W., Bolli, H. M., Rögl, F., Riedel, W. R., Sanfilippo, A., and Premoli Silva, I. 1972. Paleocene to Recent planktonic microfossil distribution in the marine and land areas of the Caribbean. Initial Reports on the Deep Sea Drilling Project 15:769–771.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1984. A compendium of fossil marine families. Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology, No. 51.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1986. Global bioevents and the question of periodicity. Pp. 47–61. In Walliser, O. (ed.), Global Bio-Events. Springer-Verlag; Berlin.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1989. Periodicity of extinction and the problem of catastrophism in the history of life. Journal of the Geological Society, London 146:7–19.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J., and Raup, D. M. 1986. Periodicity in marine extinction events. Pp. 3–36. In Elliott, D. K. (ed.), Dynamics of Extinction. John Wiley and Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company; New York.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and Lipps, J. H. 1982. Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns, and catastrophes in the fossil record. Geological Society of America Special Paper 190:291–296.Google Scholar
Stanley, G. D. 1988. The history of early Mesozoic reef communities: a three-step process. Palaios 3:170–183.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. W. H. Freeman and Company; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1982. Species selection involving alternative character states: an approach to macroevolutionary analysis. Third North American Paleontological Convention Proceedings 2:505–510.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1986a. Anatomy of a regional mass extinction: Plio-Pleistocene decimation of the Western Atlantic bivalve fauna. Palaios 1:17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1986b. Extinction. Scientific American Books; New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., and Campbell, L. D. 1981. Neogene mass extinction of Western Atlantic molluscs. Nature 293:457–459.Google Scholar
Stott, L. D., and Kennett, J. P. 1989. Evolution of the Antarctic seasonal thermocline and seasonality during the late Paleogene: inferences from stable isotopic composition of planktonic foraminifers. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 21:A87.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1:1–30.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and Adaptation. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J. 1980. Molluscan extinction at the Panama isthmus: predation or food? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 12:541.Google Scholar
Voigt, E. 1981. Critical remarks on the discussion concerning the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 10:92–114.Google Scholar
Westerman, G. 1984. Gauging the duration of stages: a new approach for the Jurassic. Episodes 7:26–28.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1978. A paleobotanical interpretation of Tertiary climates in the Northern Hemisphere. American Scientist 66:694–703.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1989. Climatic change near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary and the effects on the terrestrial flora of western North America. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 21:A88–A89.Google Scholar
Yin, H. F. 1985. On the transitional bed and the Permian-Triassic boundary in South China. Newsletters in Stratigraphy 15:13–27.Google Scholar