Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:29:33.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A social dimension to enjoyment of negative emotion in art reception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Brock Bastian*
Affiliation:
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. brock.bastian@unimelb.edu.auwww.brockbastian.com

Abstract

The proposed model overlooks the contribution of a relational/prosocial dimension to the enjoyment of negative emotion in art reception. Negative experiences have a unique capacity to build social bonds and may also increase motivation to “connect” with the artist. This affiliative motivation ensures that people experience an artwork as more emotional, more intense, more interesting, and ultimately more rewarding.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bastian, B., Jetten, J. & Ferris, L. J. (2014a) Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psychological Science 25:2079–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J. & Leknes, S. (2014b) The positive consequences of pain: A biopsychosocial approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review 18:256–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S. & Bargh, J. A. (2014) Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science 25(12):2209–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. L., Sheffield, D., Leary, M. R. & Robinson, M. E. (2003) Social support and experimental pain. Psychosomatic Medicine 65(2):276–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E. (1995) Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. [The elementary forms of religious life]. Free Press. (Original work published 1912).Google Scholar
Penner, L., Brannick, M. T., Webb, S. & Connell, P. (2005) Effects on volunteering of the September 11, 2001, attacks: An archival analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35(7):1333–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. & Updegraff, J. A. (2000) Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review 107(3):411–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Dawans, B., Fischacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E. & Heinrichs, M. (2012) The social dimension of stress reactivity: Acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological Science 23:651–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. (1996) Rites of terror: Emotion, metaphor and memory in Melanesian initiation cults. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2:703–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M. & Swann, W. B. (2014) Brothers in Arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(50):17783–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., Roepstorff, A. & Bulbulia, J. (2013) Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science 24:1602–05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed