Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:25:56.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Older people's relationships with their adult children in multicultural Australia: a comparison of Australian-born people and Chinese immigrants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

XIAOPING LIN ,
CHRISTINA BRYANT ,
JENNIFER BOLDERO  and
BRIONY DOW
XIAOPING LIN*
Affiliation:
National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
CHRISTINA BRYANT
Affiliation:
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia. Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
JENNIFER BOLDERO
Affiliation:
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia.
BRIONY DOW
Affiliation:
National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia. School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Xiaoping Lin, National Ageing Research Institute, P.O. Box 2127, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria 3050, Australia E-mail: x.lin@nari.unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Against the background of population ageing and increasing cultural diversity in many Western countries, the study examined differences and similarities between Australian-born people and Chinese immigrants in their relationships with adult children. The specific research questions were: (a) are there differences between these groups in the nature of parent–child relationships; and (b) if there were differences, did these differences reflect the Confucian concept of filial piety among older Chinese immigrants. The solidarity–conflict model and the concept of ambivalence were used to quantify parent–child relationships. Data from 122 community-dwelling people aged 65 and over (60 Australian-born and 62 Chinese-born people) were collected using standardised interviews. There were significant differences between the two groups for all relationship dimensions except associative solidarity. Compared to Australian participants, Chinese participants were more likely to live with their children. However, when they did not live with their children, they lived further away. They were also more likely to receive, but less likely to provide, instrumental help. Finally, they reported higher levels of normative solidarity, conflict and ambivalence, and lower levels of affectual and consensual solidarity. The differences in solidarity dimensions persisted when socio-demographic variables were controlled for. The study revealed complex differences in the nature of older parent–child relationships between Australian-born people and Chinese immigrants. Some of these differences, such as more prevalent multigenerational living among older Chinese immigrants, likely reflect the strong influence of filial piety among this group. However, differences in other dimensions, such as lower levels of consensual solidarity, might be associated with the Chinese participants’ experience as immigrants. This study also highlights the usefulness of the solidarity–conflict model as a theoretical framework to understand the nature of parent–child relationships among older Chinese immigrants.

Keywords

older parent–child relationshipsintergenerational relationshipssolidarity–conflict modelambivalencefilial pietyolder Chinese immigrants
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 37 , Issue 10 , November 2017 , pp. 2103 - 2127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiyama, H., Antonucci, T., Takahashi, K. and Langfahl, E. S. 2003. Negative interactions in close relationships across the life span. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B, 2, 70–9.Google Scholar
Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns – different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2012. Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 Census, 2012–2013. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2007. Older Australia at a Glance. Fourth edition, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Google Scholar
Bengston, V. L. 2001. Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J. B. and Silverstein, M. 2002. Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 3, 568–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. and Roberts, R. E. L. 1991. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 4, 856–70.Google Scholar
Chiang-Hanisko, L. 2010. Paradise lost: how older adult Taiwanese immigrants make decisions about their living arrangements. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 17, 3, 99–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Chiu, S. and Yu, S. 2001. An excess of culture: the myth of shared care in the Chinese community in Britain. Ageing & Society, 21, 6, 681–99.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. J., Preston, M., Raksin, J. and Bengtson, V. 1999. Types of conflicts and tensions between older parents and adult children. The Gerontologist, 39, 3, 261–70.Google Scholar
Dong, X., Wong, E. and Simon, M. 2012. A qualitative study of filial piety among community dwelling, Chinese, older adults: changing meaning and impact on health and well-being. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 10, 2, 131–46.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P. A., Liefbroer, A. C., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, G. C. M. and Mulder, C. H. 1999. Family Relationships: The Ties That Bind. A Sociological and Demographic Research Programme 2000–2006. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gans, D. and Silverstein, M. 2006. Norms of filial responsibility for aging parents across time and generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 4, 961–76.Google Scholar
Gee, E. M. 2000. Living arrangements and quality of life among Chinese Canadian elders. Social Indicators Research, 51, 3, 309–29.Google Scholar
Gibson, D., Braun, P., Benham, C. and Mason, F. 2001. Projections of Older Immigrants: People from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds, 1996–2026. Aged Care Series, Australia Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gurak, D. T. and Kritz, M. M. 2010. Elderly Asian and Hispanic foreign- and native-born living arrangements: accounting for differences. Research on Aging, 32, 5, 567–94.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, A. and Ikels, C. 2005. Filial piety in changing Asian societies. In Johnson, M. L., Bengtson, V. L., Coleman, P. G. and Kirkwood, T. B. L. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 437–42.Google Scholar
Hoff, A. 2007. Patterns of intergenerational support in grandparent–grandchild and parent–child relationships in Germany. Ageing & Society, 27, 5, 643–65.Google Scholar
Homans, G. 1958. Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 6, 597–606.Google Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. and Han, K.-H. 2010. Face and morality in Confucian society. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology. Oxford, New York, 479–98.Google Scholar
Ip, D., Lui, C. W. and Chui, W. H. 2007. Veiled entrapment: a study of social isolation of older Chinese migrants in Brisbane, Queensland. Ageing & Society, 27, 5, 719–38.Google Scholar
Kamo, Y. and Zhou, M. 1994. Living arrangements of elderly Chinese and Japanese in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 3, 544–58.Google Scholar
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Philips, J. and Daatland, S. O. 2004. Theorizing intergenerational family relationships. In Acock, A. C., Bengtson, V. L., Klein, D. M., Allen, K. R. and Dilworth-Anderson, P. (eds), Sourcebook of Family Theory & Research. Sage, London, 393–420.Google Scholar
Khoo, S.-E. 2011. Living arrangements and well-being of culturally and linguistically diverse older adults. Report for the National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre, Canberra.Google Scholar
Kritz, M. M., Gurak, D. T. and Chen, L. 2000. Elderly immigrants: their composition and living arrangements. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 27, 1, 85–114.Google Scholar
Lai, D. W. L. 2005. Cultural factors and preferred living arrangement of aging Chinese Canadians. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 19, 2, 71–86.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, K., Wang, D., Coelho, C. and Power, M. 2010. Attitudes to ageing and expectations for filial piety across Chinese and British cultures: a pilot exploratory evaluation. Aging & Mental Health, 14, 3, 283–92.Google Scholar
Lee, G.-Y. and Angel, R. J. 2002. Living arrangements and Supplemental Security Income use among elderly Asians and Hispanics in the United States: the role of nativity and citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28, 3, 553–63.Google Scholar
Lee, G. R., Peek, C. W. and Coward, R. T. 1998. Race differences in filial responsibility expectations among older parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 2, 404–12.Google Scholar
Li, W. W. 2011. Filial piety, parental piety and community piety: changing cultural practices of elder support among Chinese migrants’ families in New Zealand. Journal of Multicultural Society, 2, 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
Li, W. W., Hodgetts, D. and Ho, E. 2010. From early Confucian texts to aged care in China and abroad today: the evolution of filial piety and its implications. Journal of US–China Public Administration, 7, 7, 48–59.Google Scholar
Lin, X., Bryant, C., Boldero, J. and Dow, B. 2015. Older Chinese immigrants’ relationships with their children: a literature review from a solidarity–conflict perspective. The Gerontologist, 55, 6, 990–1005.Google Scholar
Lo, M. and Russell, C. 2007. Family care: an exploratory study of experience and expectations among older Chinese immigrants in Australia. Contemporary Nurse, 25, 1/2, 31–38.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. 2007. Solidarity–conflict and ambivalence: testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 62, 2, S100–7.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. O. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 203–23.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. and Ogg, J. (eds) 2003. OASIS Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Solidarity – Final Report. Center for Research and Study of Aging, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
Luescher, K. and Pillemer, K. 1998. Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent–child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 2, 413–25.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, M. E., Gien, L. and Durst, D. 1996. Chinese elders speak out: implications for caregivers. Clinical Nursing Research, 5, 3, 326–42.Google Scholar
Marshal, V. W., Matthews, S. H. and Rosenthal, C. J. 1993. Elusiveness of family life: a challenge for the sociology of aging. In Maddox, G. L. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics: Focus on Kinship, Aging and Social Change. Springer, New York, 39–72.Google Scholar
Millward, C. 1998. Family relationships and intergenerational exchange in later life. Working Paper 15, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Oberg, K. 1960. Cultural shock: adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 2, 177–82.Google Scholar
Park, M. and Chesla, C. 2007. Revisiting Confucianism as a conceptual framework for Asian family study. Journal of Family Nursing, 13, 3, 293–311.Google Scholar
Parrott, T. M. and Bengtson, V. 1999. The effects of earlier intergenerational affection, normative expectations, and family conflict on contemporary exchanges of help and support. Research on Aging, 21, 1, 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phua, V. C., Kaufman, G. and Park, K. S. 2001. Strategic adjustments of elderly Asian Americans: living arrangements and headship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 2, 263–81.Google Scholar
Phua, V. C., McNally, J. W. and Park, K.-S. 2007. Poverty among elderly Asian Americans in the twenty-first century. Journal of Poverty, 11, 2, 73–92.Google Scholar
Russon, J. 2003. Human Experience: Philosophy, Neurosis, and the Elements of Everyday Life. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Chen, X. and Heller, K. 1996. Too much of a good thing? Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 4, 970–82.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Gans, D., Lowenstein, A., Giarrusso, R. and Bengtson, V. 2010. Older parent–child relationships in six developed nations: comparisons at the intersection of affection and conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 4, 1006–21.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Giarrusso, R. 2010. Aging and family life: a decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 4, 1039–58.Google Scholar
Stanton, M. E. 1995. Patterns of kinship and residence. In Ingoldsby, B. B. and Smith, S. (eds), Families in Multicultural Perspective. Guilford Press, New York, 97–116.Google Scholar
Steinbach, A. 2008. Intergenerational solidarity and ambivalence: types of relationships in German families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 1, 115–27.Google Scholar
Sung, K.-t. 2007. Respect and Care for the Elderly: The East Asian Way. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Tomassini, C., Glaser, K., Wolf, D. A., van Groenou, M. I. B. and Grundy, E. 2004. Living arrangements among older people: an overview of trends in Europe and the USA. Population Trends, 115, 24–34.Google Scholar
Tsang, E. Y. L., Liamputtong, P. and Pierson, J. 2004. The views of older Chinese people in Melbourne about their quality of life. Ageing & Society, 24, 1, 51–74.Google Scholar
Turcotte, M. and Schellenberg, G. 2006. A Portrait of Seniors in Canada. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
United Nations 2005. Living Arrangements of Older Persons Around the World. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations 2011. World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Wang, D. 2004. Ritualistic coresidence and the weakening of filial practice in rural China. In Ikels, C. (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 16–33.Google Scholar
Whyte, M. K. 2004. Filial obligation in Chinese families: paradoxes of modernization. In Ikels, C. (ed.), Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 106–127.Google Scholar
Winkelman, M. 1994. Cultural shock and adaptation. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 2, 121–6.Google Scholar
Wong, S. T., Yoo, G. J. and Stewart, A. L. 2005. Examining the types of social support and the actual sources of support in older Chinese and Korean immigrants. International Journal of Ageing and Huamn Development, 61, 2, 105–21.Google Scholar