We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 June 2011
Sino-Western relations in the eighteenth century mainly found their expression in a particular mode of commercial transactions in Canton. The structure of the Western trade with China was based on silver and colonial products from India and the Malay archipelago, like silver, cotton, pepper, lead. These commodities were exchanged for Chinese tea, silk and porcelain by the mediation of the so-called Hong trades. As long as the trade structure was kept in balance the Westerners were able to make large profits and commercial relations remained the same. When the trade structure fell out balance through, for instance, a shortage of silver or the prohibition of opium smuggling, the Western powers resorted to force. The discontinuation of the traditional Sino-Western trade because of an imbalance in the trade structure eventually did not lead to the decline of trade, but to military conquest: the Opium War in 1840. This War enabled the Westerners, headed by the English, to revamp the structure of their trade with China on their own terms and forced the Chinese government into acceptance. Since then the process of the Western expansion into China was characterised by commercial expansion, military show of force and political control. In this essay I would like to analyze how the traditional structure of Sino-Western trade lost its equilibrium and to study the changing character of European expansion into China as a result of this imbalance during the period of 1740-1840.
1 Pritchard, Earl H., The Crucial Years of Early AngloChinese, 1750–1800 (Washington 1936) 163.Google Scholar
2 Morse, H.B., The Chronicles of the East India Company Trading to China 1635–1834 (Oxford 1926) I, 144.Google Scholar
3 Morse, , Chronicles, 1, 148.Google Scholar
4 260The total cargo of the ship Susanna was invoiced at 54,000 taels of silver. The 1,565 piculs of tea carried along were valued at least at 45,000 taels. See ibidem, 157. Chaudhuri, K.N., The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company (Cambridge 1978) 538.Google Scholar
5 In the years 1765–1774 the average total value of the exports from China by the EIC was 1,508,107 taels of silver annually, while the tea value was 1,071,570 taels. In 1885–1894 the total value was 4,231,107 taels at an annual average, and the tea value was 3,617,337 taels. Pritchard, , Crucial Years, 395–396.Google Scholar
6 Greenberg, Michael, British Trade and the Opening of China 1800–42 (Cambridge 1951) 3.Google Scholar
7 Sargent, A.J., Anglo-Chinese Commerce and Diplomacy (Oxford 1907) 51.Google Scholar
8 Pritchard, , Crucial Years, 163.Google Scholar
9 Greenberg, , British Trade and China, 3.Google Scholar
10 C.J.A. Jörg divided the goods shipped from Canton into six groups, the sixth group comprising the ballasts like lead, iron, sappanwood and tin. These goods were not produced in China. Jörg, , Porcelain and the Dutch China Trade (The Hague 1982) 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Glamann, Kristóf, Dutch-Asiatic Trade (The Hague 1958) 215.Google Scholar
12 de Hullu, J., ‘Over den Chinaschen handel der Oostindische Compagnie in de eerste dertig jaar van de 18e eeuw’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch Indiër (1917) 42–43.Google Scholar
13 Morse, , Chronicles, 1, 95.Google Scholar
14 Ibidem, 204.
15 From the early years up to the 1830s, the price of tea in Canton fluctuated between 23–26 taels of silver per picul. Here I take 24.5 taels as the average price in this period. The figures of tea quantity and total value of exports were cited from: Dulles, Foster Rhea, The Old China Trade (New York 1970) 210.Google Scholar
16 Pitkin, Timothy, A Statistical View of the Commerce of the United States of America (Hartford 1816) 301.Google Scholar
17 Dulles, , Old China Trade, 118.Google Scholar
18 Xiangao, Yao ed., Zhong-guo Jin-dai Dui-wai Mao-yi Shi Zhi-liao 1840–1895 (Sources of the History of Foreign Trade of Modern China, 1840–95) (Peking 1962) I, 258.Google Scholar
19 Greenberg, , British Trade and China, 5Google Scholar, cited from Robert Hart, These from the Land ofSinim (London 1901).
20 Qjng Shi Lu (QSL, the Documental Chronicle of the Qing Court), Qianlong reign, ch. 603.
21 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and the Causes of the Wealth of Nations (New York 1937) 188.Google Scholar
22 The Ming Emperor even dispatched eunuchs to the province to promote the search for silver mines in the late sixteenth century. Xie, Zhang, Dong Xi Yang Kao (Notes on the trade with the Eastern and Western Oceans) (Peking 1981) 155.Google Scholar
23 According to my calculation, all the silver flowing into China in the late Ming period (1567–1643) probably amounted to 350,000,000 silver dollars. Most silver came from Japan: about 250,000,000 dollars, while some 75,000,000 dollars came from Spanish America via Manila; the Portuguese probably carried 33,500,000 dollars from Europe to China. Guotu, Zhuang, ‘Lun Ming-ji Hai-wai Zhong-guo Si-chou Mao-yi’ (The Overseas Trade in Chinese Silk in the late Ming Period, 1567–1643)Google Scholar, in Zhong-guo yu Hai-shang Si-chou ZM-lu (China and the Maritime Silk Route), a collection of the papers presented to the International Seminar on China and the Maritime Routes of the Silk Route in Quanzhou, organized by UNESCO, 1991, 36–48.
24 Hansheng, Chüan, Song-Ming fian Bai-yin Gou-mai Li de Bian-dong Ji-qi Yuan-yin (The Fluctuation of the Purchasing Power of Silver from Song to Ming and its Causes), Xin YaJournal (Hong Kong), 8/1, 157–186.Google Scholar
25 Crosby, H.A.Kernan, Forbes John Devereux and Wilkins, Ruth S., Chinese Export Silver 1785 to 1885 (Boston 1975) 22.Google Scholar
26 Morse, , Chronicles, 1, 21, 307.Google Scholar
27 Sargent, , Commerce and Diplomacy, 49.Google Scholar
28 This table shows the proportion of silver in the stock, here I only selected the figures of ships stocks which could be known both things of the value of the goods and bullion. The rate of conversion £1=3 taels; 1 dollar = 0.72 tael.
29 Sargent, , Commerce and Diplomacy, 49.Google Scholar
30 Pritchard, , Cruaal Years, 394Google Scholar, 396, 399.
31 Glamann, , Dutch-Asiatic Trade, 69.Google Scholar
32 Ibidem, 69.
33 Jörg, , Porcelain, 27.Google Scholar
34 Glamann, , Dutch-Asiatic Trade, 243.Google Scholar
35 Jörg, , Porcelain, 35.Google Scholar
36 Guotu, Zhuang, ‘Shi-ba Shi-ji Zhong-he Hai-Shang Cha-ye Hao-yi’ (Sino-Dutch Tea Trade in the 18th Century), Hai-jiao Shi Yan-jiu (Studies on the Chinese Maritime History) 1 (1992) 56.Google Scholar
37 Jörg, , Porcelain, 197–201.Google Scholar According to Dermigny, the number of Dutch ships was 128. Dermigny, Louis, La Chine et l'Occident. Le Commerce à Canton au XVIIIe Siecle, 1732–1833 (Paris 1964) II, 522–523.Google Scholar
38 Jörg, , Porcelain, 196–197.Google Scholar According to Dermigny, this figure was 83. Dermigny, , Canton, 521–522.Google Scholar
39 Glamann, , Dutch-Asiatic Trade, 46.Google Scholar
40 Value of goods bought from China and exports of bullion from Europe to Asia by the Dutch (in f 1,000)
41 Morse, Chronicles, Vol. 2.
42 In the second half of the eighteenth century, the continental ships were larger than before, but the proportion of silver in the value of the cargos to China was lower than before.
43 The total value of the merchandise and bullion exported by the United States to China in 1805–1944 were differently calculated. Morse cited the calculations from K.S. Latourette, ‘The History of Early Relations between the U.S. and China 1784–1844’, Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 28 (1927) Cheong in his Mandarins and Merchants cited the same source. Dulles made an almost similar calculation as that of Latourette. Yan-ping Hao made use of the U.S. Senate Executive Document 31, 19th Congress, 1st Session.
44 This figure did not include the silver brought by the Dutch, Danes and other continental Europeans after the beginning of the 19th century. Since then, their ships still carried some silver to Canton but the amount must have been quite small, because they almost abandoned the China trade and only a few ships from these countries came to Canton. Moreover, most of them made use of the facilities of the English bill service and did not need to carry as much silver as before.
45 Brading, D.A., ‘Mexican Silver-Mining in the Eighteenth Century: The Revival of Zacatecas’, The American Historical Review 50/4 (1970) 66.Google Scholar
46 Kobata, A., ‘The Production and Uses of Gold and Silver in Sixteenth-Seventeenth Century Japan’, Economic History Review, Second Series, 18/2 (1965) 247.Google Scholar
47 Wilson, Charles, ‘Trade, Society and the State’, in: Rich, E.E. and Wilson, C.H. eds., The Economy of Expanding Europe in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Cambridge 1967) 511.Google Scholar
48 Cheong, W.E., ‘Trade and Finance in China’, Business History 12/1 (1965) 40.Google Scholar
49 Ibidem.
50 Egypt provides the earliest records of the use and properties of poppy. In Sumerian ideograms of 6,000 years ago the poppy is referred to as the plant of joy. It probably came from Egypt. Scott, J.M., The White Poppy: A History of Opium (London 1969) 5.Google Scholar
51 Kui, Li, Ya-pian Shi-lue (Information on Opium) (Peking 1932) I, 2.Google Scholar
52 Shizhen, Li, Ben-Cao Gang-mu (Compendium of Materia Medica) XXIII, 24–25.Google Scholar
53 Lo-Shu, Fu, A Documentary Chronicle of Sino-Westem Relations, 1644–1820 (Tucson 1966) 518Google Scholar, n. 84.
54 Chinese Repository (Canton April 1837) V, 546. Morse, H.B., The International Relations of the Chinese Empire (Shanghai 1910) I, 173.Google Scholar
55 Pritchard, , Crucial Years, 143.Google Scholar
56 Morse, , Chronicles, II, 95Google Scholar, 110, 118, 135.
57 Nathan Allen, M.D., Opium Trade (Lowell 1853) 12.Google Scholar
58 Pritchard, , Crucial Years, 217–218.Google Scholar
59 Chinese Repository, (February 1837) III, 234.
60 Allen, , Opium Trade, 10.Google Scholar
61 Trocki, Carl A., Opium and Empire: Chinese Society in Colonial Singapore, 1800–1910 (Ithaca 1990) 51–53.Google Scholar
62 Chinese Repository (April 1837) V, 546–547.
63 Fairbank, John King, Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: the Opening of the Treaty Ports 1842–1854 (Cambridge, Mass. 1953) 64.Google Scholar
64 Sargent, , Commerce and Diplomacy, 53.Google Scholar
65 Chinese Repository (April 1837) V, 547.
66 Morse, , The International Relations of the Chinese Empire, I, 238.Google Scholar
67 Dulles, , Old China Trade, 115.Google Scholar
68 Morse, , The International Relations of the Chinese Empire, 1, 238.Google Scholar
69 Dennett, Tyler, Americans in Eastern Asia: A Critical Study of United States' Policy in the Nineteenth Century (New York 1922) 115.Google Scholar
70 Dulles, , Old China Trade, 147.Google Scholar
71 Dennett, , Americans in Eastern Asia, 115Google Scholar, 120.
72 Morse, , Chronicles, III, 339.Google Scholar
73 Dulles, , Old China Trade, 148.Google Scholar
74 In 1818–1833 the primary merchandise imported into China by the English were metals such as tin and lead, woolens such as broadcloth, long ells, carnets shipped by the EIC and raw cotton shipped by the country merchants from India. The other merchandises altogether amounted to no more than 5% of the total value.
75 Before 1773 opium shipped into China was no more than 200 chests annually, while in the last decade of the 18th century, the opium shipped to China was no more 2,000 chests on average per annum.
76 An American opium trader estimated that in 1827–30 the Americans shipped about 1,200–1,400 chests of opium to China annually, which was valued at $ 600,000–700,000. Dinyi, Li, Zhong-mei Zao-ai Guan-xi Shi (The History of the Early Sino-American Relation) (Taipei 1960) 97–98.Google Scholar
77 Dulles, , Old China Trade, 147.Google Scholar
78 Morse, , Chronicles, III, 54–56.Google Scholar
79 After the lifting of the maritime prohibition in 1567, the Ming government established a maritime tax office in Haicheng in Fujian Province, and decreed the listing of taxes levied on imports. The tax rate on opium (a-pian) was 2 taels for per 100 jin (1 jin = 0.5 kilogram). Xie, Zhang, Dong-xi Yang-kao, ch. 7.Google Scholar
80 When the Qing government lifted the maritime prohibition and established maritime customs, opium was still listed in the medical category of imports and taxed. Chou-ban Yi-wu Shi-mo (The documental chronicle of foreign affairs), Daoguang reign, ch. 4, 1.
81 According to the edict, the opium traders should be subject to the same penalties as those who bought the contraband. The responsible local authorities who failed to discover the trade and transportion of opium were to be punished according to the regulations. According to Qing-chao Xu Wen-xia Tong-kao (taxes, No. 23) this edict was issued in 1727, according to Guangxu Ta-Qing Hui-dian Shi-li (ch. 828, laws), in 1729.
82 Daoguang-chao Wai-jiao Shi-liao (Diplomatic records of the Daoguang reign), ch. 4, 50.
83 Dingyuan, Nan, Lu-zhou Chu-ji (The first collections of Luzhou) (1880) ch. 2, 16.Google Scholar
84 QSl, Daoguang reign, ch. 227, 4.
85 Ibidem, ch. 240, 1–2.
86 China's Society of History ed. Ya-pian Zhan-zhen (Sources of the Opium War) (Shanghai 1954) I, 505.Google Scholar
87 Zhongping, Yan, Selections, 34.Google Scholar
88 Ibidem, 37.
89 The memorials of the censors Naiji, Xu and Xijue, Huang, Chou-ban Yi-wu Shi-mo (The Documental Chronicle of Foreign Affairs), Daoguang reign (1821–1850), ch. 1, 2Google Scholar; ch. 2, 5.
90 Zezu, Lin, Huguang Cuo-gao (Collection of Memorials from Huguang Province), ch. 5, 11–12Google Scholar, in: Lin Wen-zhong Gong Zhen-shu (Collection of the Official Articles written by Lin Zexu).
91 Fairbank, , Trade and Diplomacy, I, 74.Google Scholar
92 Commentary of the noted tea-drinker Gladstone. Lowe, Peter, Britain in the Far East: A Survey from 1819 to the Present (London 1981) 14.Google Scholar
