Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:29:54.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collaborative writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Neomy Storch
Neomy Storch*
Affiliation:
The University of Melbourne, Australianeomys@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Writing has generally been perceived as a solitary activity, completed by the writer working alone. Yet, over the years we have witnessed a growing interest among researchers and educators in Collaborative Writing, an activity that can be simply defined as the involvement of two or more writers in the production of a single text. This interest has been driven by two main factors. The first factor is the nature of workplace writing. Studies (e.g. Ede & Lunsford 1990; Mirel & Spilka 2002) have shown that in a number of workplaces, writing is often completed in teams rather than individually. The second factor is the advent of Web 2.0 applications such as blogs, wikis, and Google Docs, which have transformed literacy practices, making the creation and sharing of texts easier and more readily acceptable (Hyland 2016; Vandergriff 2016). In the field of second language (L2) learning, interest in collaborative writing was also spurred by early research conducted by Swain and her colleagues (e.g. Swain & Lapkin 1995; Swain 1998; see also timeline for additional references) showing the language learning opportunities of communicative tasks which involve joint written output (e.g. Dictogloss).

Type
Research Timeline
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 40 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the ‘conversation of mankind’. College English 46.7, 635−652.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 33−56.Google Scholar
Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mirel, B. & Spilka, R. (eds.) (2002). Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2017). Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities in EAP classes. In Bitchener, J., Storch, N. & Wette, R. (eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students. Instructional approaches. New York: Routledge, 130−144.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64−81.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97−114.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In Byrnes, H. (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 95−108.Google Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16, 371−391.Google Scholar
Vandergriff, I. (2016). Second-language discourse in the digital world: Linguistic and social practices in and beyond the networked classroom. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 144−188.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar